Thursday, June 18, 2009

Above The Law Administration

please see ACORN petition at bottom of article

The White House claims Inspector General Gerald Walpin was effectively away without leave from his Washington office and that he was so "disoriented" and "confused" at a May 20 meeting that it made officials "question his capacity to serve." An exclusive witness told The Washington Times both charges are baseless. Full Story on witness to Walpin-gate, by James Robbins, Washington Times.

Now it is founded a second Inspector General has been fired for probing to far, and a third is in serious dispute with the Obama administration. Walpin had led an investigation of Mayor Kevin Johnson of Sacramento, Calif., a former NBA player and Obama supporter. Johnson started a nonprofit education program that Walpin's office alleged had misused federal funds. Walpin was fired immediately by Obama, which violates a law which went into effect last year. The law stipulates no Inspectors General can be dismissed without showing proper cause to Congress and a 30 day notice. This law was supported by then Senator Obama.

Senator Charles Grassley, R- Iowa, has called for an investigation into the matter. Sen. Grassley sent a letter Wednesday to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner demanding information about a "dispute over certain Treasury documents" that he said were being "withheld" from Inspector Neil Barofsky's office on a "specious claim of attorney-client privilege." Barofsky was appointed as the public watchdog over the government's multi-billion dollar bailout of the nation's financial system. This is the transparency in affect.

This week, the International Trade Commission told its acting inspector general, Judith Gwynne, who is not subject to White House authority, that her contract would not be renewed. Grassley had become concerned about the independence of her investigation, because of a report earlier in the year that an agency employee forcibly took documents from the acting inspector general.

Grassley, who is the ranking Republican on the Finance Committee, is now concerned about whether a pattern is emerging in which the independence of the government's top watchdogs, whose jobs were authorized by Congress to look out for waste, fraud and abuse, is being put at risk. Grassley sent a letter via email to the ITC asking why certain information was being withheld from the IG. Less than three hours after the letter was e-mailed to the agency, the acting IG, Gwynne, was told that her contract, which expires in early July, would not be renewed.

Just like ACORN and so many other issues where laws are being broken, either by Obama, or his cronies, nothing is being done. Only a few, Dems or Reps, are even questioning certain goings-on. It is clear, laws are being broken. These are just a few of the clear crimes being committed by Obama and his admistration:

*He violated the law and the provisions of the Constitution by seizing control of GM and Chrysler without proper authorization from Congress. Although his unlawful cronies in Congress granted him the authority after the fact, his action to seize corporations was a violation of the law at the time it was implemented. The fact that the U.S. Supreme Court allowed this atrocity is no matter. Thomas Jefferson said it best when he articulated a key principle of liberty--any government that willfully violates the rule of law and encroaches on the rights of the people ceases to be a legitimate government. This government has violated the provisions of the 5th Amendment regarding due process and fair compensation at the very least.

*His use of ACORN as a campaign vehicle is a violation of the law. Entities such as ACORN are prohibited by the Federal Government from engaging in partisan political activity. It is clear to anybody with eyes and ears that this organization was an overtly pro-Obama entity, the goal of which was to do nothing but get out the vote for BO.

*His consistent and blatant pandering to America's sworn enemies in the Muslim world is tantamount to treason, the definition of which, according to the U.S. Constitution, is the aiding and abetting of America's enemies. Can there be any doubt that Obama should at least be charged with the offense, given his penchant for going out of his way to offend our allies such as Israel, Britain, France, and Germany, while implementing policies that favor Hamas, Iran, Egypt, Syria, and other terrorist hotbeds?

*He broke a law that he himself pushed and helped pass as a Senator that provides protections for Inspectors-General who do their jobs by investigating corruption, waste, and fraud in government programs. Yet when these government watchdogs get too close to the thuggery of Obama's friends, they get summarily fired for no good reason, such as Mr. Walpin.

*And then there are those who believe that Barack Obama has no valid U.S. birth certificate. At first such charges were dismissed as the musings of kooks. But increasingly many level-headed Americans are beginning to look closely, realizing that perhaps those who first broke this story are not kooks after all. So far, no valid copy of Obama's birth certificate has been produced, meaning that if he doesn't have one, he is not even eligible to serve, which can only point to yet another violation of the law--fraud.

*Several citizens have filed criminal complaints calling for the impeachment of Barack Obama based upon these and other issues. One of those issues is the illegal use of the military in Alabama to police the streets of a small town that had been hit with a crime wave.

Canada Free Press published an interview with one man who filed a criminal complaint against Obama based upon the illegal use of the military, his missing birth certificate, and his treasonous acts regarding America's enemies. Here is the reporter's introduction to the interview:

In light of the now almost daily bombardment of the US Constitution by the sitting US Commander in Chief, the question ‘is our Constitution still the law of the land?’ is increasingly being asked by We-the-People. The problem of Barack Hussein Obama seeming not to be a natural-born citizen is still an extremely salient issue—an issue that has led Obama to hire a team of lawyers to keep all information on his actual country of birth and all of his college records hidden. The latest estimate on the fees charged to do so is over $1Million.

This, coupled with Obama’s continued and strong apparent push to completely bankrupt the USA and turn it into his own personal totalitarian utopia has led to unprecedented actions by some US citizens.

Recently, retired Navy Commander Walter Francis Fitzpatrick III filed a criminal complaint of Treason against Barack Hussein Obama. This has prompted other individuals around the country to do the same. As our Republic now stands on the brink of complete collapse, I thought an interview of Commander Fitzpatrick was in order.

And here is an excerpt of this explosive interview:

Sher: For those who haven’t yet read the criminal complaint, please tell us what it entails.

Walt: Mr. Obama is named in the commission of the crime of TREASON by a commissioned officer in the U.S. military. TREASON is the only criminal act our Constitution records. Mr. Obama is described in the criminal complaint as a ‘foreign born domestic enemy and a traitor’. This simple declarative sentence is intended to state clearly Mr. Obama meets elements of the crime of TREASON by being an enemy of the United States and our constitutional form of government. It states also Mr. Obama adheres to other U.S. enemies and gives them aid and comfort (Obama’s criminal assistants).

Sher: After you filed the complaint against Obama, I understand that you were visited by the Secret Service. Can you tell me and my readers what transpired? And what legal reason did they give you as their justification to interrogate you?

The upshot of all of this is that a man occupies the White House who under normal circumstances would be facing impeachment hearings in Congress.

Read the entire article to find out the conclusion of Mr. Fitzpatrick's 'visit' from the Secret Service HERE.

There is just now beginning to be Congressional support of a bill to demand Obama's proof of eligibility to hold the office. A few days ago Sheperd Smith, of FOX News, called the "birth certificate thing" lunacy, and a conspiracy theory, by idiots. Problem with that is, Smith, like so many others, just believe that a President wouldn't be President if he were not qualified. We can't seem to get satisfaction from our President, so it will take a literal act of Congress to force the issue and make Obama submit to the will of THE PEOPLE he works for.

Please sign petition to stop ACORN from receiving tax dollars

No comments:

Post a Comment