Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Throwing Out The Baby...: Russian Arms Deal


Now that all the apologies have been made, Obama(community organizer) sends Hillary(former housewife) to Russia to present them with a non-bilateral and unconditional offer for them to inspect all our nuclear facilities. How far does this lunacy go before we start caring about the children? What in hell are we leaving them?

Russia and the United States have tentatively agreed to a weapons inspection program that would allow Russians to visit nuclear sites in America to count missiles and warheads. The plan would constitute the most intrusive weapons inspection program the U.S. has ever accepted.

Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, who met with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, said publicly Tuesday that the two nations have made "considerable" progress toward reaching agreement on a new strategic arms treaty. I'll bet it's considerable...we give them all they've ever wanted and they give nothing. Not even cooperation with Iran which Obama has been sniffling to them about.

How far can we let this community organizer fool go? This is not bilateral. We tell Russia all our coordinates so their first strike eliminates our second strike. How far does this lunacy go before we save our children? This is the most radical statements I've made to date, as this is the most radical thing Obama has done to date, believe it or not.

Even though the revolution had already begun, 9 months ago we were still considered the "Super Power"... You do understand don't you? We are now considered by all our enemies to be a joke, and they are working on finally eliminating their thorn.

Do you think the lies and deception stops with health care? Wait until the rude awakening we face in foreign affairs, from the community organizer with ON-THE-JOB-TRAINING!!! Do you remember Carter? The nightmare had just begun there...just wait!

By the time the majority of America wakes up and a new Congress can entertain Treason charges, the damage will be irreversible.

Sunday, October 11, 2009

Response To Military Paid More Than They Deserve


This Cindy Williams is NOT the "Laverne & Shirley" Cindy Williams. She is a Assistant Director for national Security in the Congressional Budget Office.....

Military Pay

This is an Airman's response to Cindy Williams' editorial piece in the Washington Times about MILITARY PAY, it should be printed in all newspapers across America

Ms. Cindy Williams wrote a piece for the Washington Times, denouncing the pay raise(s) coming service member's way this year citing that the stated 13% wage increase was more than they deserve. I am very curious to know what Miss Williams feels about Congress approving over 20% increase in their pay(along with outlandish fringe benefits), and aside from corruption which is ruining our country, refuse to do the job they were assigned.

A young airman from Hill AFB (pictured above) responds to her article below. He ought to get a bonus for this.

"Ms Williams: I just had the pleasure of reading your column, "Our GIs earn enough" and I am a bit confused. Frankly, I'm wondering where this vaunted overpayment is going, because as far as I can tell, it disappears every month between DFAS (The Defense Finance and Accounting Service) and my bank account. Checking my latest earnings statement I see that I make $1,117.80 before taxes per month. After taxes, I take home $874.20. When I run that through the calculator, I come up with an annual salary of $13,413.60 before taxes, and $10,490.40, after.

I work in the Air Force Network Control Center where I am part of the team responsible for a 5,000 host computer network I am involved with infrastructure segments, specifically with Cisco Systems equipment. A quick check under jobs For Network Technicians in the Washington , D.C. Area reveals a position in my career field, requiring three years experience with my job. Amazingly, this job does NOT pay $13,413.60 a year. No, this job is being offered at $70,000 to $80,000 per annum........... I'm sure you can draw the obvious conclusions.

Given the tenor of your column, I would assume that you NEVER had the pleasure of serving your country in her armed forces. Before you take it upon yourself to once more castigate congressional and DOD leadership for attempting to get the families in the military's lowest pay brackets off of WIC and food stamps, I suggest that you join a group of deploying soldiers headed for AFGHANISTAN ; I leave the choice of service branch up to you. Whatever choice you make, though, opt for the SIX month rotation: it will guarantee you the longest possible time away from your family and friends, thus giving you full "deployment experience."

As your group prepares to board the plane, make sure to note the spouses and children who are saying good-bye to their loved ones. Also take care to note that several families are still unsure of how they'll be able to make ends meet while the primary breadwinner is gone obviously they've been squandering the "vast" piles of cash the government has been giving them.

Try to deploy over a major holiday; Christmas and Thanksgiving are perennial favorites. And when you're actually over there, sitting in a foxhole, shivering against the cold desert night; and the flight sergeant tells you that there aren't enough people on shift to relieve you for chow, remember this: trade whatever MRE (meal-ready- to-eat) you manage to get for the tuna noodle casserole or cheese tortellini, and add Tabasco to everything. This gives some flavor.

Talk to your loved ones as often as you are permitted; it won't nearly be long enough or often enough, but take what you can get and be thankful for it. You may have picked up on the fact that I disagree with most of the points you present in your op-ed piece.

But, tomorrow from KABUL , I will defend to the death your right to say it.

You see, I am an American fighting man, a guarantor of your First Amendment rights and every other right you cherish. On a daily basis, my brother and sister soldiers worldwide ensure that you and people like you can thumb your collective nose at us, all on a salary that is nothing short of pitiful and under conditions that would make most people cringe. We hemorrhage our best and brightest into the private sector because we can't offer the stability and pay of civilian companies.

And you, Ms. Williams, have the gall to say that we make more than we deserve? You can kiss my royal red a**!!!

A1C Michael Bragg Hill AFB AFNCC

We salute all our armed forces for your dedicated service, and want you to know that Miss William's opinion is not indicative of most of America. I wonder, Ms Williams, if you will also be at the airport with a sign protesting our servicemen upon their return.


Friday, October 9, 2009

Obama Wins Nobel Prize For...?

Every year the prestige of the Nobel Peace Prize diminishes. Eventually(which should be the case now) notification of recipients will be on an obscured portion of the newspaper.

Well, isn't it a good thing they gave him the Nobel Prize BEFORE he's indicted for TREASON???

The main question one has to ask...What on earth was he awarded for? He has undeniably accomplished nothing in his first year of his administration, even though he has a Democrat controlled Congress. He is too radical even for many of those on the left.

The Prestige of the Nobel Prize is rounded off now with Barack's name added to the likes of Yasir Arafat and Al Gore. There's something to be proud of, even if you haven't really accomplished anything to actually be awarded a prize, unless it is the Junior Commies Club 'man of the year'.

Al won for spreading GREEN(backs in his pocket); Yasir won for spreading Piece(s of humans by strapping bombs to kids backs); and now Barack has won for spreading the wealth of Americans(even though it is anti-American)... All agendas of United Nations. Spreading is more important than Uniting, to the U.N. (NWO)

Obama supports tyrants all over the globe. His policies are in line with their agendas, especially in the Middle East. He supports dictators right here in our own hemisphere, including Zelaya of Honduras, who was legally removed from power by the Honduran Congress, in order to avert a coup attempted by Zelaya. Obama still calls the Honduran action a coup, and has placed sanctions against the country.

While Senator, Obama used U.S. tax dollars to help Raila Odinga (his paternal cousin, responsible for ethnic genocide) become President of Kenya.

Coincidence? Previous to now Jimmy Carter was regarded as the worse President this nation has seen. After it's all said and done, Obama will not only be regarded the same, but, will hold the record for number of indictments of an American President; both win the non prestigious Nobel Prize.

Perhaps, if they took off the PEACE part of the title of the prize. It is indicative of the (lack) of integrity in journalism. The whole deception issue. Perception is everything, and when the majority of the people are uninformed and unaware...well, let's just say the U.N.'s agenda is on a roll like a greased wheel, with Obama at the helm.

It has been very obvious for a decade or better that the Nobel Peace Prize took a parallel view to the U.N., but, somehow, A.C.O.R.N. is connected to this...I just know it!!!

Thursday, October 8, 2009

Supreme Court/Mojave Cross update



The Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States have heard oral arguments in the Salazar v. Buono case, a lawsuit in which the display of a Mojave Desert cross to honor war veterans is being challenged.


The plaintiffs claim that the cross is offensive, and because of that ''offense'' they're entitled to sue in court. The ACLJ fundamentally disagrees. To create a constitutional crisis out of an eight-foot cross honoring veterans is wrong.

Take just two minutes to view a special video update from the Supreme Court steps!

The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) filed a critical brief with the Court, representing 15 Members of Congress and tens of thousands of our members from across the country.

There is no question - religious symbols are constitutional. In fact, the Supreme Court Justices ruled unanimously earlier this year in a similar case regarding display of the Ten Commandments.

View the brief video report now!

We are expecting a decision in early Spring, and because of the support of members all over America, we can also expect a victory!

Thanks for staying informed and involved. Visit us online at www.aclj.org and be sure to tune in to Jay Sekulow Live! for further updates on this and other key issues and cases.

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Unconventional Warfare Now

Unconventional Operations to the Rescue
(Part One of the Lily Pad Strategy)
by Paul E. Vallely, U.S Army, MG (ret)

Most Americans desire an effective change in the US war strategy and the wider global war against Islamic extremists and nations supporting them. President Obama, Secretary, Robert Gates and the Generals and Admirals must deliver it by placing experienced unconventional warfare leaders in charge of the war effort.

Since forcibly removing Al Qaeda and the Taliban in just 34 days in the Fall of 2001 with 100 Special Op Forces and Air Power and Saddam Hussein removed from power in 2003, the U.S.-led coalition Forces has been unable to achieve a take home Victory.

While many Americans recognize the conflict in Afghanistan is not going well and changes need to be made, there is substantial disagreement at the national level on a military strategy. The U.S. is seriously considering adding more conventional forces. Sending an additional 40,000 U.S. troops to Afghanistan under current military strategies will be unlikely to make much difference. Excessive and restrictive rules of engagement must be lifted and rules for engagement built into the local Commander’s Operational plan to allow maximum power to be brought to the battle. As well, “Boots on the ground in Afghanistan” really mean Afghan boots on the ground.

Unlike US/NATO troops, the adversaries in this war do not carry arms openly, wear uniforms or insignias, and abide by other laws and customs of wars specified in Geneva conventional and protocols. They instill fear in military opponents, village leaders and local populations through use of suicide bombings, improvised explosive devices, kidnappings and beheadings. And they disguise themselves as civilians and hide among civilian populations with weapons stored and discharged from mosques, schools, hospitals, market-places, private residences and public roads.

To prevail, the U.S. has to transition from a conventional to an unconventional war footing and make the enemy pay a heavy price for their despicable tactics. The US must use “proxy forces”. "If you support me, I will destroy the Taliban and al Qaeda," Gen. Abdul Rashid Dostum told The Washington Times in an interview at his northern stronghold. "I don't want to be a minister, not even the defense minister. I need to be with my soldiers. Give me the task and I will do it." Other ethnic leaders have made similar offers, but their support is problematic. Gen. Dostum is one of Afghanistan's most notorious warlords -- a Russian-educated former defense minister who turned against the Soviet Union in the 1980s but became a key figure in the Russian-backed fight against the Taliban a decade later. The tribal leaders with support are the only ones that can turn the tide of the war and not the central government in Kabul. As well, there can be no sanctuaries in Pakistan for the Taliban and Al Qaeda.

In Iraq and elsewhere, traditional troops, weapons and tactics are less useful than tools of influence, covert operations, and intelligence brought to the battlefield by special operators working harmoniously with indigenous forces and local populations. The prime objective is to create a climate of fear within enemy ranks that breaks their will to continue the armed insurrection.

Joint special operators (from all military branches) are also trained in local cultures and languages making it easier for them to embed in local populations and Afghan security forces and collect information which in turn may be used to “hunt and kill” hostile forces.

Forget about Nation Building until the enemy is defeated.

The action continues to meet resistance throughout DOD’s conventional warfare ranks, their industry partners, and congressional allies. The U.S. active duty military force consists of 1.4 million troops of which only about 50,000 are elite special operators, with only several thousand deployed to Afghanistan. Many military professionals prefer to have special operators continue in a supporting, not leading role.

Immediately after recently assuming his new post, Gates correctly stated that the U.S. must win in Iraq or face a “calamity” that would “endanger Americans for decades to come.” Since the fall of Baghdad, the U.S. has had the will to win but not the right strategy. It’s imperative that the U.S. transition quickly to an unconventional war strategy the war will be lost. The new “Lily Pad Strategy” must evolve now. There will be more published on this new out-of-the-box- global war-fighting strategy…….

Paul Vallely, MG U.S. Army (Ret) is Chairman of the Stand Up America USA and Save Our Democracy Now Projects and co- author of “Operation Sucker Punch” and “Endgame".


Sunday, October 4, 2009

Blind Leading the Blind: Michael Moore's Socialist Propaganda

The Hands-Out: "Death To Capitalism!!!"; ***Uh, like, OK... they are the 'Hand That Feeds You';(?); Are ya suicidal too? How ironic is it? The Socialists turn the ignorant against Capitalists who are the very ones paying for their entitlements.

Michael Moore's new film is anti-capitalism, but, i have yet to find ANY venue where it is being shown FREE. Moore has more than capitalized on his scam and Socialist agenda, in as much the same way as Al Gore. In fact, the most wealthiest politicians are the Democrats pushing for all the Socialist programs, convincing the 'Hands-out' they are all concerned for them.

There are actually people who can tie their own shoes which believe Moore's film is "Religious" and capitalism is anti-Christian. Nothing is more ungodly than Socialism and the ranks which befall it.

Hey Michael Moore! I got news for ya buddy...not only are you confused about capitalism, but, you are contributing to it as much as anyone in society by promoting your misleading propaganda which is deceiving the very people which depend on the Capitalist's taxes for their entitlements. FOCUS!

The present government's agenda is to make everyone the same...dependent on the government. We have to assume Obama IS a law grad, as like no other Pres before him he has not presented any documentation of any kind, but, what is intelligent abou...t ridding the country of those vile tax payers which pay for the government?

Socialism, and its successor Communism, has failed in every country that has adapted it, past and present. If you like Communism call your travel agent and take advantage of the cheapest deals in the world, as nobody else travels to them. Your time is running out here!!!

"Americans will never give up their capitalism, and jump into communism. But, give them a little Socialism ata a time, and they will one day wake up in Communism"~ Nakita Khrushchev, former leader of the Soviet Union

Be careful what you wish for...

Saturday, October 3, 2009

Pro-Life Amendments Defeated: Exposing The Lies


On Wednesday, the Senate Finance Committee’s vote of 10-13 to defeat the Hatch Amendment proved the pro-life community correct: The talk from the White House and the Congressional leadership of avoiding funding of abortions in health care is just that -- talk.

The amendment sponsored by Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) would have explicitly prohibited federal funding and coverage of abortions. Also defeated by the committee was another amendment by Sen. Hatch that would have prevented discrimination against any individual or organization who refused to provide, pay for, provide coverage of, or refer for abortions.

So what does this mean? Since the start of the health care debate, including at a White House meeting last month, Americans United for Life Action has argued consistently that rhetorical assurances that abortion funding will not be included in health care reform are not enough. Rhetoric must be matched with action, with the addition in the bills of specific language prohibiting abortion. Since all five committees have rejected pro-life amendments which would ban abortion funding and coverage in health care, it is clear that we MUST keep questioning the gap between reality and the rhetorical assurances we are hearing from President Obama, Majority Leader Reid and Speaker Pelosi.

The AUL legal team has documented the facts behind their myth that the Hyde Amendment would adequately prevent federal funding and coverage of abortion in health care reform. AUL wants you to have the facts to make it easy to speak up.

Now that committee consideration of health care reform is over, the “behind the scenes” negotiations begin. At this crucial stage, the Congressional leadership is going to be negotiating backroom deals with our legislators. Be aware that the next page in the pro-abortion playbook will be that Pelosi and Reid are going to try to make a deal like the anti-life Capps Amendment approach, which we oppose. The anti-life Capps Amendment approach is not acceptable because for the first time in history, the federal government will require that there be a health insurance plan that covers abortion in every area. Furthermore, the anti-life Capps Amendment permits federal money to go to insurance plans that cover abortion.

I assure you, we are hearing that the “deals” being discussed by Congressional Leadership on Capitol Hill are merely anti-life initiatives in the guise of ‘compromise,’ such as the Capps Amendment approach, and this will NOT protect pro-lifers from subsidizing abortion in health care reform.

This is where you come in.

YOU need to tell your congressman and senator that you will ONLY accept health care reform that includes an explicit prohibition on federal funding and coverage of abortion, much like the pro-life Stupak-Pitts and Hatch amendments that were defeated in Committees.

Everyone's support is important during this extremely busy time as we work to show Congress and all Americans that “Real Health Care Respects Life”!

Understand the Abortion Mandate. You can print and send your friends this flowchart [PDF sheet] which demonstrates how the abortion mandate will work without an explicit, proactive exclusion of abortion from health care reform. Please let your friends know about these efforts to mandate taxpayer-funded abortions as a part of the current health care proposals.

The first Sunday in October is Respect Life Sunday. On this special day, please reflect with gratitude on God’s priceless gift of human life. While you are at church, you can help make a difference by printing and handing out several copies of AUL's flyer to help educate your friends and family that Real Health Care Respects Life!

AUL in the news and Related articles:

NY Times: BlogTalk: Public Option, ACORN and the Children

RedState.com: Reality Check: The Reality Behind the Rhetoric About Abortion in Health Care Reform (by Charmaine Yoest)

National Review: Health-Care and Abortion Funding Update