Ethics or Intimidation: Birther Judge Carter Stands To Be Recused

David O. Carter (born 1944 in Providence, Rhode Island) is a United States District Court Judge for the Central District of California. Assumed office October 22, 1998, Nominated by Bill Clinton. Carter is hearing the case Barnett vs Obama, questioning the legitimacy of the President's office.

On October 1, just four days before the Motion To Dismiss hearing, Carter hired Siddharth Velamoor to serve as one of his two official clerks, from Oct. 1, 2009, till Sept. 30, 2010. Velamoor is a lawyer who works for a law firm where Robert F. Bauer, one of Obama’s top lawyers is a partner. Bauer’s wife is none other than Anita Dunn, the White House Communication’s Director.

The unethical placement of Velamoor on Judge Carter's staff means the case is extremely flexible, and a waste of time. It does not matter either way the case would go, the whole case is invalid. If the case goes against the plaintiff, Orly Taitz will file motion for Judge Carter's recusal. If it is in favor of the plaintiff, the Judge will have himself recused.

Was this a conspiracy (theory?) right out of the Clinton style politics? Obama/Chicago style strategy? Or, is this how Judge Carter saves face by agreeing to hear the case, but, the outcome is worthless? I guess we'll have to wait for the movie. I'm sure it will baffle even the most dedicated John Grisham fan.

Carter is a former Marine and Viet Nam vet. Carter began his legal career as an Assistant District Attorney with the Orange County District Attorney's Office in 1972 where he became the senior deputy district attorney in charge of the office's homicide division. Carter was the initial prosecutor and filed charges in the case of serial killer William Bonin, also known as "The Freeway Killer," who became the first person executed by lethal injection in California in 1996.

In addition to his judicial functions, Carter now performs a wide array of speaking engagements. He has lectured fellow judges through the California Judges College, the Judicial Criminal Law Institute, and the Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference. He also speaks frequently with judges abroad, including past engagements in Brazil, Bosnia, China, The Philippines, and Malawi. Carter finally teaches an undergraduate course on the international narcotics trade at the University of California, Irvine, where he has three times received the school's Distinguished Professors Award, and has taught with the Whittier Law School's Summer Abroad Program.

In 1981, Carter joined the bench as a Municipal Court Judge in Orange County, California. One year later, he became an Orange County Superior Judge, a position that he held until joining the federal judiciary in 1998. Carter initiated a variety of programs to assist in the rehabilitation of convicted felons, including a tattoo removal program for gang members, and was active in planning the county's Law Day festivities. He earned the nickname "King David" from attorneys while serving as the Supervising Judge of the court's Criminal Division.

Carter was nominated by President Bill Clinton on June 25, 1998 to fill a seat vacated by William J. Rea. Carter was confirmed by the United States Senate on October 21, 1998, and received his commission the following day. He now sits in the Southern Division of the Central District of California in Orange County, California.

As a jurist, Carter is known for his acute intellect, courteous judicial demeanor, tireless work ethic, and expertise in complex criminal litigation. Although he is assigned to the Central District of California, Carter also regularly sits by designation in the District of Idaho and on occasion with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and in the District of Guam.

The Conspiracy of Conservatives

*Please see petition at bottom
U.S. Rep. Marsha Blackburn, a Tennessee Republican, has become the sixth co-sponsor of a proposal by Rep. Bill Posey, R-Fla., that would require documentation of eligibility from presidential candidates.

She has joined Reps. John Campbell, R-Calif.; John R. Carter, R-Texas; John Culberson, R-Texas; Bob Goodlatte, R-Va.; and Randy Neugebauer, R-Texas, in support Posey's H.R. 1503 plan.

Read full story here at WND.

As the liberals step up their campaign to influence the unsuspecting and uninformed portion of the population into believing the "birther" movement is just a "conspiracy theory" coming from the "sore losers", more public officials are realizing the importance of verifying the qualifications of a candidate.

Section 5, Article II of the Constitution provides protection from a foreign entity to instill their influence over our Republic. As so many other provisions of our carefully constructed Constitution and Bill of Rights, however, this one has gone grossly ignored by the faction which moves diligently toward a larger, oppressive government.

The politician's agenda is clear, aspiring for more power and institute regulations in every facet of our lives. The majority of the population has become lazy and does not want to be burdened with political details. They wish for the government to just do their job and take care of everything for them. Unfortunately, in the process, the group of humans which we have bestowed that trust and privilege to have done that which any human would. They have done that which our founding fathers were completely all too aware.

We have given the reigns over to a group of power hungry individuals and they have runaway with them. They knew from experience, as it failed with Carter when Ronald Reagan happened, they would only fool the people for so long, before they awake. The Liberal Democrats and Republicans are in a mad rush to accomplish their goals of 'no return' collapse before another sensible, Constitutional loving human comes along and thwarts their plans.

The movement to Socialism would have been unheard of and any injection into our law rejected a decade ago, by most. However, over a period of time, and interjecting laws guised as something else in order to implement control of freedom of speech, right to bare arms, and any other Constitutional provision which gets in their way, they have almost completed their decades (or centuries) old dream of global control.

The ones who conspire are the ones who yell the loudest that their opponents are the conspirators, or crazy. Every defendant's attorney attempted to prove I was crazy, in order to project the illusion of "reasonable doubt". That's the oldest trick in the 'book of manipulation'.

Through all their wonderful gifts and promises, they have convinced an ever growing portion of the population their way is the better way. Trust in them and they will do whatever is best for you. Of course, they only have the citizens needs in their plans, as they were "Sainted" and the most holy people on the planet.

WAIT!!! WHAT?!! They Aren't Saints?

Certainly, they must be ordained, at least. We all know we can trust a small percentage of people dedicated to a life of serving God, as a sort of "crapshoot" of sorts. Do you mean to tell me that we have placed all our trust and the powers of the strongest country in the world over to a group of ordinary corruptible individuals?

Oh, Thank God!!! They took an oath before they entered office. An oath to uphold our Constitution, which protects us from anyone gaining too much power over the people.

But, They don't believe in the Constitution!!!

That's right! And, they are liars, we all know that. In fact, their major concern is to eliminate our way of government, as they believe the people should not have so much power over those individuals which think they are smarter and seek to gain control over every decision you may have to make. What we do with our money, our health regards, even how long we take a shower, will be just a small part of their say in our lives.

Why would we ever allow this to happen? Good question. Doesn't seem very likely that a people that has been so blessed to have had millions of people die for them in order to pass along such a freedom and individual rights, would just throw it away. Ahh! But, when you mix lazy with blind trust, over a period of time, you get a larger growing group with their hands out, screaming for more. This group has been convinced by the group which promises them everything, the ones who really provide everything are the evil ones, and don't want the hand out group to have anything.

Ironically, the ones of whom are not lazy, are therefore demonized, and to be eliminated, as they will just revolt and try to stop the madness that seeks their demise. This is all accomplished over a period of time and serious planning with movements such as ACORN and other activist groups which are pawns for the elite group. Whenever the pawns get caught doing things which should land them in jail, they have full support of the elite we have placed in office to protect them.

Message of Caution to Liberal Zombies:

Yes my friends, no matter how many laws are broken by a corrupt group or politician which is for the 'good' of the hands-out group, PROGRESS(ivism) must not be stopped. It is the best thing for you, so you don't want to interfere, or you may have to make your own decisions some day, and you don't want that. So you better stop those mean Conservatives who want to take away all the gifts we have planned for you.

Conservatives will lie and tell you there is a reason for the Constitutional provisions, to protect the people. They will tell you crazy things, like they are the backbone of America and without them there will be no gifts. Evil Conservatives will have you believe when they are gone the charity will dry up and there will be long lines waiting for basic needs. You know none of this can possibly be true, as your politicians have told you so. Be very careful, because if you listen to those conspirators who believe in individual rights, and a man responsible for his own life, the politicians you blindly trust may fail. Then, who will wipe behind you?

Exclusive: A Page From Barack Obama's Diary "No, I won't show my birth certificate"

*Please sign petition to Supreme Court to challenge Obama's eligibility HERE

Above The Law Administration

please see ACORN petition at bottom of article

The White House claims Inspector General Gerald Walpin was effectively away without leave from his Washington office and that he was so "disoriented" and "confused" at a May 20 meeting that it made officials "question his capacity to serve." An exclusive witness told The Washington Times both charges are baseless. Full Story on witness to Walpin-gate, by James Robbins, Washington Times.

Now it is founded a second Inspector General has been fired for probing to far, and a third is in serious dispute with the Obama administration. Walpin had led an investigation of Mayor Kevin Johnson of Sacramento, Calif., a former NBA player and Obama supporter. Johnson started a nonprofit education program that Walpin's office alleged had misused federal funds. Walpin was fired immediately by Obama, which violates a law which went into effect last year. The law stipulates no Inspectors General can be dismissed without showing proper cause to Congress and a 30 day notice. This law was supported by then Senator Obama.

Senator Charles Grassley, R- Iowa, has called for an investigation into the matter. Sen. Grassley sent a letter Wednesday to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner demanding information about a "dispute over certain Treasury documents" that he said were being "withheld" from Inspector Neil Barofsky's office on a "specious claim of attorney-client privilege." Barofsky was appointed as the public watchdog over the government's multi-billion dollar bailout of the nation's financial system. This is the transparency in affect.

This week, the International Trade Commission told its acting inspector general, Judith Gwynne, who is not subject to White House authority, that her contract would not be renewed. Grassley had become concerned about the independence of her investigation, because of a report earlier in the year that an agency employee forcibly took documents from the acting inspector general.

Grassley, who is the ranking Republican on the Finance Committee, is now concerned about whether a pattern is emerging in which the independence of the government's top watchdogs, whose jobs were authorized by Congress to look out for waste, fraud and abuse, is being put at risk. Grassley sent a letter via email to the ITC asking why certain information was being withheld from the IG. Less than three hours after the letter was e-mailed to the agency, the acting IG, Gwynne, was told that her contract, which expires in early July, would not be renewed.

Just like ACORN and so many other issues where laws are being broken, either by Obama, or his cronies, nothing is being done. Only a few, Dems or Reps, are even questioning certain goings-on. It is clear, laws are being broken. These are just a few of the clear crimes being committed by Obama and his admistration:

*He violated the law and the provisions of the Constitution by seizing control of GM and Chrysler without proper authorization from Congress. Although his unlawful cronies in Congress granted him the authority after the fact, his action to seize corporations was a violation of the law at the time it was implemented. The fact that the U.S. Supreme Court allowed this atrocity is no matter. Thomas Jefferson said it best when he articulated a key principle of liberty--any government that willfully violates the rule of law and encroaches on the rights of the people ceases to be a legitimate government. This government has violated the provisions of the 5th Amendment regarding due process and fair compensation at the very least.

*His use of ACORN as a campaign vehicle is a violation of the law. Entities such as ACORN are prohibited by the Federal Government from engaging in partisan political activity. It is clear to anybody with eyes and ears that this organization was an overtly pro-Obama entity, the goal of which was to do nothing but get out the vote for BO.

*His consistent and blatant pandering to America's sworn enemies in the Muslim world is tantamount to treason, the definition of which, according to the U.S. Constitution, is the aiding and abetting of America's enemies. Can there be any doubt that Obama should at least be charged with the offense, given his penchant for going out of his way to offend our allies such as Israel, Britain, France, and Germany, while implementing policies that favor Hamas, Iran, Egypt, Syria, and other terrorist hotbeds?

*He broke a law that he himself pushed and helped pass as a Senator that provides protections for Inspectors-General who do their jobs by investigating corruption, waste, and fraud in government programs. Yet when these government watchdogs get too close to the thuggery of Obama's friends, they get summarily fired for no good reason, such as Mr. Walpin.

*And then there are those who believe that Barack Obama has no valid U.S. birth certificate. At first such charges were dismissed as the musings of kooks. But increasingly many level-headed Americans are beginning to look closely, realizing that perhaps those who first broke this story are not kooks after all. So far, no valid copy of Obama's birth certificate has been produced, meaning that if he doesn't have one, he is not even eligible to serve, which can only point to yet another violation of the law--fraud.

*Several citizens have filed criminal complaints calling for the impeachment of Barack Obama based upon these and other issues. One of those issues is the illegal use of the military in Alabama to police the streets of a small town that had been hit with a crime wave.

Canada Free Press published an interview with one man who filed a criminal complaint against Obama based upon the illegal use of the military, his missing birth certificate, and his treasonous acts regarding America's enemies. Here is the reporter's introduction to the interview:

In light of the now almost daily bombardment of the US Constitution by the sitting US Commander in Chief, the question ‘is our Constitution still the law of the land?’ is increasingly being asked by We-the-People. The problem of Barack Hussein Obama seeming not to be a natural-born citizen is still an extremely salient issue—an issue that has led Obama to hire a team of lawyers to keep all information on his actual country of birth and all of his college records hidden. The latest estimate on the fees charged to do so is over $1Million.

This, coupled with Obama’s continued and strong apparent push to completely bankrupt the USA and turn it into his own personal totalitarian utopia has led to unprecedented actions by some US citizens.

Recently, retired Navy Commander Walter Francis Fitzpatrick III filed a criminal complaint of Treason against Barack Hussein Obama. This has prompted other individuals around the country to do the same. As our Republic now stands on the brink of complete collapse, I thought an interview of Commander Fitzpatrick was in order.

And here is an excerpt of this explosive interview:

Sher: For those who haven’t yet read the criminal complaint, please tell us what it entails.

Walt: Mr. Obama is named in the commission of the crime of TREASON by a commissioned officer in the U.S. military. TREASON is the only criminal act our Constitution records. Mr. Obama is described in the criminal complaint as a ‘foreign born domestic enemy and a traitor’. This simple declarative sentence is intended to state clearly Mr. Obama meets elements of the crime of TREASON by being an enemy of the United States and our constitutional form of government. It states also Mr. Obama adheres to other U.S. enemies and gives them aid and comfort (Obama’s criminal assistants).

Sher: After you filed the complaint against Obama, I understand that you were visited by the Secret Service. Can you tell me and my readers what transpired? And what legal reason did they give you as their justification to interrogate you?

The upshot of all of this is that a man occupies the White House who under normal circumstances would be facing impeachment hearings in Congress.

Read the entire article to find out the conclusion of Mr. Fitzpatrick's 'visit' from the Secret Service HERE.

There is just now beginning to be Congressional support of a bill to demand Obama's proof of eligibility to hold the office. A few days ago Sheperd Smith, of FOX News, called the "birth certificate thing" lunacy, and a conspiracy theory, by idiots. Problem with that is, Smith, like so many others, just believe that a President wouldn't be President if he were not qualified. We can't seem to get satisfaction from our President, so it will take a literal act of Congress to force the issue and make Obama submit to the will of THE PEOPLE he works for.

Please sign petition to stop ACORN from receiving tax dollars