Data Integrity

Is It Live, Or Is It Memorex?

2011-09-01T17:03:00.000-07:00

The bin Laden hoax...

I don't doubt bin Laden is dead, but Obama had NOTHING to do with it. NOTHING!!! But he needed it. He hasn't done anything credible since in office and absolutely had to have the credit for bin Laden. Preliminary reports before Obama spoke that Sunday night were that bin Laden was dead for at least a week but they were waiting for DNA (via AP and confirmed by someone in Pentagon).

Then, Obama addressed the nation and claimed he gave the order to take out bin Laden that morning. Now, I considered there may have been a mix up in communication, but the next day (Monday) at the White House press conference, a reporter asked why they were 99.9% sure it was bin Laden that they killed....they replied it was DNA. DNA takes at least a week to be confirmed.

General Petraeus was at the Military base half mile from where bin Laden was staying a week before (same time bin Laden really died) and immediately Obama appointed him Director of CIA the following Monday ( a week before Obama claimed to have given the order to kill bin Laden) so he couldn't answer to press if questions arose. It was all BS---thats why they conveniently disposed of the body in a way that had NOTHING to do with islamic ritual, but used that as their 'fall back'. It is inappropriate to dump a muslim body at sea when they've been killed on land PLUS muslims claim bin Laden was not one of them anyway, which we also know is BS. Most muslims consider bin Laden the most holiest man alive.

ITS ALL BS and many Americans swallow it. There are very intelligent people in our Government, at least as intelligent as myself. I don't doubt there is someone who knows the facts the way I do, yet NO ONE is raising any question in regards to Obama's involvement or the discrepancies. I would love for someone with half a brain to explain why America is so gullible when it comes to Obama...even his opposition...if he truly has any.

Flight 93 father: ground zero mosque is the SECOND mosque being built on a 9/11 site

2010-08-09T16:49:00.000-07:00

Flight 93 father: ground zero mosque is the SECOND mosque being built on a 9/11 site

Pamela Geller, who is leading the fight against the ground zero mosque in New York, has posted the following letter from Tom Burnett Senior.

To our fellow 9/11 families and to all who are concerned about the Ground Zero mega-mosque in New York:

We want everyone to know that the Park Service is right now building an even larger Islamic victory mosque atop the Flight 93 crash site. Many of you were outraged in 2005 when the Crescent of Embrace design was unveiled to be a half-mile wide Islamic shaped crescent:

Left: 2005 publicity shot of the Crescent of Embrace design. Right: typical Islamic crescent and star, viewed from a similar angle.

Few people know that this giant crescent actually points to Mecca, or understand the religious significance of this orientation. A crescent that points the direction to Mecca is a very familiar construct in the Islamic world. Because Muslims face Mecca for prayer, every mosque is built around a Mecca direction indicator called a mihrab. The classic mihrab is crescent shaped. Here are the two most famous mihrabs in the world:

Left: the Mihrab of the Prophet, at the Prophet's mosque in Medina. Right: the mihrab of the Great Mosque in Cordoba Spain.

Face into the crescent to face Mecca

As with the Medina and Cordoba mihrabs, a person facing into the Crescent of Embrace will be facing Mecca. In the image below, superimposed red lines show the orientation of the Flight 93 crescent. The green qibla circle is from an online Mecca-direction calculator:

A person standing between the tips of the crescent and facing into the center of the crescent (red arrow) will be facing almost exactly in "qibla" direction (the Muslim prayer direction). You can verify the qibla direction from Somerset PA using any number of on-line Mecca-direction calculators.

To be precise, the Crescent of Embrace points 1.8° north of Mecca, ± a tenth of a degree. The final construction drawings alter this orientation slightly, so that instead of pointing a little less than two degrees north of Mecca, the actual crescent will point less than three degrees south of Mecca. Such small deviations from Mecca are insignificant by Islamic standards, which developed over a period of more than a thousand years during which far flung Muslims had no accurate way to determine the direction to Mecca.

The Park Service does not call the Crescent of Embrace a crescent anymore. Now they call it Circle of Embrace, but the only actual change was to add an extra arc of trees (planted to the rear of a person facing into the giant crescent) that explicitly represents a broken off part of the circle. The unbroken part of the circle, what symbolically remains standing in the wake of 9/11, is just the original Crescent of Embrace. It is still a giant Islamic shaped crescent, still pointing at Mecca.

This is the Park Service's official explanation for the design: the terrorist attacks are depicted as smashing our peaceful circle and turning it into a giant crescent. A clearer depiction of Islamic victory is hard to imagine, so no one should be too surprised that the damned thing points to Mecca, and actually turns out to be a mosque.

Other mosque features

Mosque design is based on a dozen typical mosque features, every one of which is realized in the Crescent/Circle design, all on the same epic scale as the half mile wide crescent-mihrab. Note, for instance, that the 93 foot tall minaret-like Tower of Voices is topped with another Islamic-shaped crescent, akin to the crescent-topped minarets seen in many Islamic countries:

An Islamic shaped crescent, soaring in the sky above the symbolic lives of the 40 heroes, which literally dangle down below. In Islam, there is only heaven and hell. Symbolic damnation?

The Flight 93 mosque needs to be stopped, along with the Islamic victory mosque at ground zero in Manhattan. May the fight against these two desecrations strengthen each other.

Sincerely,

Tom Burnett Senior
Loving father of Flight 93 hero Tom Burnett Junior

Pamela's Atlas Shrugs post includes a second letter from Mr. Burnett, thanking her for her help and passing on some information about the design selection process. (The vote for was 9 to 6 from a judging panel where family members were outnumbered 8-7 by left wing design professionals.)

NOVEMBER EJECTIONS: ENOUGH IS ENOUGH

2010-08-02T09:24:00.000-07:00

YOU MUST VOTE IN THE NOVEMBER EJECTIONS !!!

Governor George Pataki Announces Formation of Revere America

2010-05-04T22:45:00.001-07:00

Organization Dedicated to Advancing Common Sense Public Policies Rooted in Freedom and Free Markets

First up: National Petition Drive to Repeal, Reform, Replace ObamaCare

Former Governor George Pataki (R-NY) announced April 15, 2010, the formation of Revere America -- a new organization dedicated to advancing common sense public policies rooted in freedom and free markets.

Pataki, who will serve as Chairman of Revere America, also announced that the organization's first project will be a national petition drive to gather the signature of one million Americans who want to repeal, reform and replace ObamaCare with the responsible reforms our healthcare system needs and that the American people want.

Pataki is expected to formally launch Revere America and kick-off its national petition drive at an event in Boston on April 18 -- the 235th Anniversary of Paul Revere's ride. Following that event, Pataki will immediately embark on a cross-country tour that will ultimately take the Revere America petition drive to all 50 states.

Pataki said:

"235 years ago Paul Revere embarked on his historic ride warning the people that their freedom was in danger. The people joined together. They defeated liberty's enemies. Our unwavering commitment to freedom has been the cornerstone of a nation that has prospered and flourished.

"In recent years, that has changed in alarming ways. Washington's liberal elite have enacted one policy after the next that are chipping away at our precious freedoms and which threaten to change the very essence of America.

"Revere America is being launched to counter the forces of liberalism by advancing common sense public policies rooted in our traditions of freedom and free markets, and that will once again make America secure and prosperous for generations to come.

"The recently enacted government takeover of health care is perhaps the most egregious example of an unfettered power grab by Washington Liberals in our history.

"Despite overwhelming opposition from Americans across every walk of life, Washington trampled on the Constitution. Washington ignored the people. The people are angry. They are worried. They want this law repealed.

"Revere America will help the people make their voices heard by collecting one million signatures of those who want to repeal, reform and replace ObamaCare with the responsible reforms our healthcare system needs and that the country wants.

"We live in a country where our traditions and principles matter. In the spirit of Paul Revere and the countless other patriots who helped make America the greatest nation on earth, I am honored to announce the coming launch of Revere America."

Editors Note: The first stops of Revere America and Governor's Pataki multi-state tour will be announced in the coming days.

Please Sign The Petition to Repeal Obamacare

Another Islamic Bow By Barack Hussein

2010-04-15T00:33:00.000-07:00

Nuclear Summit logo is an Islamic-shaped crescent

World leader, known for reminding the Islamic world that his middle name is Hussein, hosts nuclear summit, presided over by large Islamic-shaped crescent:

Photo by Ron Sachs. Post via Error Theory.

It is hard to believe that the State Department could do this by accident:

An Islamic crescent is a very distinct and completely unnatural geometric shape, combining a circular outer arc with a non-concentric circular inner arc. The unnaturalness is an Islamic religious requirement. A lunar crescent has an elliptical inner arc. Using such a natural shape as a religious symbol would risk idolatry (the worship of any actual thing besides God). Thus Muslims use as their symbol the explicitly unnatural circle-in-circle crescent shape.

Sometimes the inner circle sits entirely inside the outer circle. This arrangement is typically used to symbolize Islamic world domination, as seen in the MAS logo. More often the inner circle extends beyond the outer circle, as seen on the last last Ottoman flags:

Turkish flag. Crescent covers an unnatural 2/3rds of a circle of arc, give or take (in contrast to a lunar crescent, which always covers a half a circle of arc).

Obama's circle-in-circle NSS logo uses a thin crescent to combine the world encompassing aspect of the MAS logo with the more familiar Ottoman crescent, covering less than a full circle of arc.

Obama has ordered his underlings not to notice Islamic connections

Given that the unnatural circle-in-circle crescent is the only widely recognized graphic symbol of Islam, it must have been recognized as such by at least a significant percentage of the State Department personnel who saw it prior to the summit. Why didn't anyone object, forcefully and publicly if necessary?

It would seem to be the Fort Hood phenomenon, where witnesses to Nidal Hasan's murderous ideology were afraid that making an issue of it would be career suicide, thereby enabling Hasan's mass murder of American soldiers. Obama has now made the career suicide threat official, ordering all members of the executive branch to be as oblivious to Islam as possible. The more disturbing the Islamic connection, the more it is to be avoided, to the point where Muslim terrorists, whose reading of orthodox Islamic interpretation compels them to slaughter infidels, are no longer to be called "Muslim terrorists" or "Islamic extremists." Everyone is just supposed to ignore their Islamic motivation.

Hydrogen atoms and Swastikas

Defenders of Obama's nuclear crescent (trolls in the comments at Gateway) think that so long as the Islamic-shaped crescent can be interpreted in some non-Islamic way, there is nothing wrong with using an Islamic shaped crescent to represent American hospitality:

Oh please, folks, get a grip. It’s modeled after a hydrogen atom, you know, as in hydrogen bombs?

This issue came up when the Missile Defense Agency's crescent shaped website logo became a news story in February.

MDA website logo, uses the world-encompassing symbolism of a full circle-in-circle crescent favored by several Islamic terror groups:

Left: Islamic Palestine Block insignia. Center: Hamas insignia. Right: PLFP insignia (Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine).

MDA spokesman Rich Lehner insists that the world-encompassing circle-in-circle crescent "symbolizes the worldwide protection of our homeland and deployed forces." But do we get to redefine in this way the only symbol shape that our terror war enemies claim as their own?

By that logic, one could say that the swastika represents a helicopter rotor in motion, making a great logo for our Apache squadrons, but no such interpretation can obviate the established meaning of the symbol shape, and like the swastika, the full circle-in-circle crescent has its own established meaning (a meaning not so different from the swastika). It represents Islamic domination of the planet. For Lehner to protest that this isn't what the full circle-in-circle crescent means to him is as ludicrous and irrelevant as saying that he sees the swastika as a spinning propeller.

Not that it matters, but the NSS logo fails as hydrogen atom

Most obviously, why the gap in the electron's orbit? The only purpose of this gap would seem to be to turn the crescent into the familiar Islamic-shaped crescent.

Less obviously, notice that the fattening of the crescent at the lower left indicates visually that the electron is coming closer at that point. That would only be the case if the orbit were being observed somewhat edge-on, but that would make the orbit appear to the observer as an ellipse, not the circle seen in the NSS logo.

By the same token, since the orbit is seen as circular rather than elliptical, that means it is being observed from above (from one of the poles of the axis of rotation), which means the electron is not moving closer to and further from the observer, hence no crescent-like fattening of the arc would be observed.

The only purpose for the unnatural fattening of the circle on one side representation would again seem to be to create the familiar Islamic shaped crescent.

Frank Gaffney was pre-mature in walking back his concerns about the MDA crescent

Kudo's to Frank Gaffney for forcing our Democrat dominated media to address the crescent shaped MDA logo two months ago. In addition to noting the Islamic shape, Gaffney also noted the likeness to Obama's permanent campaign logo:

When he discovered that the MDA logo predated the Obama administration, Frank began a walk-back, which he extended to the crescent shape:

It has also been observed that – rather than embracing the symbolic crescent and star, they could be interpreted as the targets of the intercepting swoosh in the MDA’s latest logo. If so, the 2009 design would presumably be offensive to Islamists, rather than evidence of submission to them.

No, the crescent cannot be interpreted as the target of the intercepting missile, because the target of the intercepting missile is explicit. It is shooting down another missile. The missile shot in the logo can be interpreted as defending the crescent, but it cannot be interpreted as attacking the crescent because the crescent is not a missile.

Ignorant coincidence, or stealth jihad?

The unanswered question is whether the Islamic-looking logos are the product of ignorant coincidence or Islamic supremacism. There are stealth jihadists who work in the field of Islamic symbolism, like the Los Angeles architect who designed the giant Mecca-oriented crescent that is now being built atop the Flight 93 crash site. A crescent that Muslims face into to face Mecca is called a mihrab, and is the central feature around which every mosque is built. (Some mihrabs are pointed arch shaped, but the archetypical mihrab is crescent shaped.) The planned memorial will be the world's largest mosque.

Like Gaffney (sorry Frank, but you really wimped out on this one), the defenders of the crescent mosque are willing to embrace untenable excuses for their Islamic symbol shape. Asked how he could abide the Mecca orientation of the giant crescent, Patrick White, Vice President of Families of Flight 93, argued that the almost-exact Mecca-orientation cannot be intended as a tribute to Islam because the in-exactness of it (within 2° of Mecca) would be "disrespectful" to Islam.

After the cartoon jihad, Gaffney and White might be excused for thinking that Muslims will take offense at just about anything, but the fact is, orthodox Islam cares very little about how exactly anyone faces Mecca for prayer. For most of Islam's 1400 year history, far flung Muslims had no accurate way to determine the direction to Mecca. Thus it developed as a matter of religious principle that what matters is intent to face Mecca (and God).

So where did Patrick White get the idea that orientation on Mecca must be exact? From a Muslim scholar commissioned by the Park Service to answer just this question. His name is Nasser Rabbat, and he told the Park Service a flat out lie. Why? Rabbat is presumably a stealth jihadist, though he could have also been doing a personal favor for ex-classmate Paul Murdoch, the Los Angeles architect who designed the Crescent of Embrace.

This is why these possibly coincidental Islamic symbol shapes need to be properly investigated: because where there is smoke, there is sometimes fire.

Gaffney was also premature in dismissing the Obama-like character of the MDA logo

Just because the Obama-like logo was not a product of the Obama administration does not mean it was not the work of a freelance Obamaton, or even an Obama-connected logo designer.

Obama started using his logo in early 2007, when it made a huge splash in the logo-design community. The contract for the MDA logo was not let until September 2007 and the logo itself did not appear until October 2008. Thus the MDA logo was designed while Obama's logo was all the rage, and given Obama's connections in the advertising industry, his people could even have exercised some direct influence over the MDA logo.

The strong Obama likeness makes it almost certain that the MDA logo was created by an Obama partisan as a tribute to Obama. From that strong prior, the likelihood that the Islamic-shaped crescent was also intentional goes up dramatically. Our president does not emphasize the "Hussein" in "Barack Hussein Obama" for nothing.

Deportation to Death---But Mommy and Daddy Loves Rifqa

2010-04-07T20:28:00.001-07:00

UPDATE on Rifqa Bary

The teenage girl who converted to Christianity and ran away from home is being blocked by her Muslim parents from fighting the possibility of deportation, her attorney told a judge today in an ongoing custody dispute.

Rifqa Bary, 17, who fled home last year and stayed with a Florida minister whom she met on Facebook, is an illegal immigrant and does not want to be returned to her native Sri Lanka because she fears being harmed or killed by Muslim extremists.

Her attorney, Angela Lloyd, asked a judge to sign an order stating that reunification with her parents is not possible by her 18th birthday in August. The order would allow Bary, who is in foster care, to apply for special immigration status without her parents' consent.

Judge Gill denied Mohamed and Aysha Bary's motion to back out of a deal made on January 19th to allow Rifqa to remain in foster care and attempt reconciliation through the court system. The parents pretended to not know that Rifqa still had contact with other Christians and cried foul once they got Rifqa to plead 'unruly'.

Their plan backfired today as Judge Gill ruled that the deal made on January 19th would remain in effect and essentially claimed that reconciliation will only be possible if the parents stop the court antics and actually try to talk to Rifqa using the court-appointed counselors.

The Columbus Dispatch and the rest of the CAIR controlled media continues to report that the Lorenzes in Florida are under investigation (which is not true as they have been cleared by FDLE). However, Brian Williams does remain under investigation in Ohio where helping to save someone's life is now a criminal act.

For more information, check these sources out:

Note the disappointed tone of "Hijab"ß Heagney at the Columbus Dispatch.

Also, read how sympathetic the Associated Press is with the parents who "just want a reasonable, good faith chance at reconciliation". You would think that loving parents wouldn't drag their child to court for 6 months, making and breaking every deal made, spreading libel and allowing serious defamation to make its way around the internet accusing Rifqa of partying and sleeping around with random men.

It is amazing how many people are ignorant to the true nature and agenda of Islam and sharia law. I would recommend any who believe the deceptive rhetoric that claims Islam is really a peaceful and loving religion to read the Koran. Do not read the totally worthless Western version, however, as it plays with words and phrases to deceive. There are several versions for that reason. This is why the first Pillar (Shahadah) of the Koran is to read the Koran in Arabic, so the real message is obtained. A true muslim wouldn't want to misinterpret the command to kill infidels, or Israelis on site at every opportunity as we are all Satan's spawn.

30 Minutes To Say Goodbye

2010-03-29T20:13:00.000-07:00

“Another gross miscarriage of justice by our government”
From Stand Up America:
Contact: standupamericaceo@gmail.com
www.standupamericaus.com

Most of you are aware of the facts in the case involving 1Lt Michael Behenna as detailed at www.defendmichael.com. These facts in and of themselves are horrific and represent a total betrayal of a young man who truly fought for his country against a determined and ruthless enemy. But few of you know the gut wrenching details that transpired after Judge Dixon denied the motion for a mistrial.

It was a Friday, March 20, 2009, three weeks after Michael was convicted of unpremeditated murder for the killing of Al Qaeda terrorist Ali Mansur. Before we left Michael's apartment to drive to the courtroom for the mistrial hearing, Michael gave his mother Vicki his billfold and car keys in case the unimaginable happened. Michael seemed prepared for the worst since he had been disappointed many times during his trial. Yet the thought that the Judge would not declare a mistrial seemed a remote possibility to us that morning. Based upon Vicki's experience with such matters as a federal prosecutor this should have been an open and shut case for granting a new trial. But at 2 PM that afternoon our world came crashing down when the judge denied the motion for mistrial claiming that Dr. MacDonell's testimony would NOT have changed the jury's verdict. He then told us that the defendant had thirty minutes to say good bye to his family.

We were stunned and in disbelief inside that courtroom. Tears instantly fell from our eyes at the news. Michael's girlfriend, Shannon, collapsed on the floor sobbing. Vicki and I reached for Michael, but he didn't want to be touched by anyone. Shannon's father was incensed at the prosecutors. Michael stood there stoically - his life changed forever. The family was ushered to a holding room where we had thirty minutes to say goodbye. Michael sat silently as one by one each of us hugged him and told him how much we loved him and that we would do everything possible to correct this injustice. Members of Michael's platoon told him to stay strong. A Sergeant Major that Michael had worked with on post the previous three weeks knelt beside Michael and told him 'You will always be a soldier.' He then stood and saluted Michael. The last thing Michael said to us before an MP escorted him away was "Don't let me be
Forgotten." Then, just like that, he was gone.

We stood outside the courtroom and waited until a military van whisked Michael away to the county jail where he would await transfer to Leavenworth. The family then drove to Michael's apartment where we spent the next several hours packing his belongings for shipment back to Oklahoma. Going through Michael's things only deepened our sense of loss. As parents you want to protect your children from harm and we were utterly powerless to do so. We packed away Michael's things in silence.

The next day Vicki, Shannon and I were able to visit Michael at the county jail where he was locked up with common criminals. Shannon has a vivid memory of seeing Michael in an orange jump suit leaning up against the wall waiting for his turn to visit. She says he looked like a little boy who was lost and unsure of what was happening to him. We knew what this young man was made of inside. There is no quit in him and whatever life threw at him he would survive it and come out stronger on the other end. But that knowledge did not ease the pain of seeing our son in such a place.

That would be the last time we would see or talk to Michael for over a month. Among the many actions the Army has taken against our son there is one that is truly unforgiveable. For his trip to Fort Leavenworth prison Michael was dressed in his officer's uniform and then paraded visibly handcuffed through the Nashville airport, then the Milwaukee airport, and then the Kansas City airport; flying from one airport to another on a commercial jet with two MP's on each side of him.

The only reason we knew he had been transferred to Leavenworth was because one of the flight attendants on Michael's flight from Milwaukee to Kansas City noticed this young man in an Army uniform in handcuffs with the two MP's sitting beside him. Near the end of the flight Michael asked for a pencil and paper and simply wrote the phrase 'defendmichael.com' and handed it back to the attendant. The flight attendant went to Michael's website that very night and posted a comment telling us that Michael was on his flight.

It has already been twelve months since Michael went to prison. But in those twelve months Michael's story just keeps gaining momentum. Because of you he has not been forgotten. There has been over 250,000 hits on his website with over 1,500 comments posted. Another 15,000 signatures on his Online petition. And Over 12,000 friends on the Free Michael Behenna Facebook page were posted. Over 3,000 people are wearing defendmichael wristbands. Hundreds and hundreds of letters were sent to Congressmen, Senators, and Military Leaders. And then there are the countless people who have been so inspired by Michael's story that they have taken action on their own. For example, a retired police officer in New York has somehow gotten postage stamps made that say defendmichael.com. Another supporter is distributing bumper stickers and others are passing out flyers in their communities. The founder of the Band of Mothers organization helped arrange meetings with members of Congress regarding Michael. And recently Michael couldn't believe his ears when he heard Michael Savage of the Savage Nation radio show talking about his case as he was sitting in his prison cell. There is even the possibility of an HBO documentary on Michael's story.

One year into his imprisonment Michael is living one day at a time. He is trying to make sense of what has happened while holding onto the hope that his freedom is not fourteen years away. I'm reminded of a line by the playwright Aeschylus which says 'And even in our sleep, pain that cannot forget, falls drop by drop upon the heart, and in our own despair, against our will, comes wisdom to us by the awful grace of God.' If it is from pain that wisdom does spring forth, then Michael is becoming a very wise soul indeed. Again, from the bottom of our hearts, THANK YOU for your continued support and prayers for a soldier we proudly call our son.

Scott and Vicki Behenna www.defendmichael.com

Sign Petition

Coffee Party: Chock Full O' Nuts

2010-03-06T15:54:00.000-08:00

"We did not do enough to help our friend Van Jones" is a direct quote from the Coffee Party manifesto. Anyone who is a true, Constitution supporting Patriot of this great country should know by now to RUN as fast as possible from a group which supports Van Jones.

Jones was Barack Hussein Obama's Green Czar. Of all the criminal and Communist vowing cabinet members, Jones is the only one to be released as he was too outspoken of his Communist ties and agenda, even for the Obama administration. However, the Coffee Party, conceived just three weeks ago, has over 80,000 followers and many of them are Conservatives and professed Christians.

Coffee Party, started as a facebook page, was supposedly the brainchild of a Korean woman, Annabel Park, former campaign worker for Obama, and political strategist (video below). The introduction to the group is very patriotic sounding, implying the concept of the group is liberty and 'making voices heard'. If you check a little further you will find the Declaration of Independence. I also found a website, but will not provide link here as I found it had "malicious software" installed.

Strangely, the group organizers did not want my voice heard. I recognized right away that several conservatives belonged to the group, so I investigated to see if it was something I would be interested in. As I delved into the conceptual literature, which can only be posted by administrators of the site, I continued to see one particular word repeatedly---PROGRESSIVE. (movement to change our Constitution)

The word (progressive) is a particular 'hitch in my get along' anyway, so I dug even deeper to ensure just what was the true nature of this group. I could not believe my eyes when I began to read comments such as "We must force media to convince people TEAPARTIERS are all racists." Eventually I would find the support of Van Jones and many more racist-teaparty remarks and strategies, but not before I read their calls to promote EVERYTHING Obama does. They go on to state Government is supposed to be trusted to take care of our needs, and we (citizens) should get out of government's way. In other words, it was instructing people to shut up and not obstruct the government...a far cry from the "All voices should be heard" introductory statement.

It became clear this was nothing less than another Obama cult.

I copied and pasted (unedited) several of the statements made by the administrators of the site which can be viewed here. The next day I was accosted by dozens of people I never heard of, including a few officials of the Coffee Party organization. The messages (mostly on twitter) started out as denials to everything I had posted from their sites (web & fb). Some acted confused, asking where I found such material. Then, it progressed into I was a liar, even though I gave locations, and posts were unedited.

As the day progressed (I hate that word now) and I did not buckle to the threats of law suits and slander, the messages evolved into attacks on my character. It was the usual 'Alinsky Handbook For Radicals' non-sense. If they shout loud and long enough that you are a lune or a scare-monger, the concept is people will listen and disregard what you have to say. Again, a far cry from the pledges I first read upon arrival to their site regarding "ALL SHOULD BE HEARD" as they scrambled to shut me up.

As I warned people the Coffee Party website had malicious software (just like White House site), several people with too much caffiene accused me of installing it.

I begged them to sue me, so we could exchange 'Discovery' and it would reveal exactly who and what was behind Ms Parks' so-called 'grassroot' organization. They dropped that issue quick. From then on I received insults and name calling, mostly from college students. They informed me I was no patriot, a hypocrite Christian, racist, living in a fantasy world, and those are just a few I can repeat.

What was very alarming is the numerous ones I was able to talk to and derived at they had no clue what was the true nature of the group. Reminiscent of my pondering how so many felt duped by Obama during the campaign, when it was clear what he was, if they would have been more informed.

Others I spoke with from the group, unsuccessfully, claimed to be Christians, and questioned my involvement in politics. The first thought came to mind, I must admit, wasn't very Christian, as I attempted to reason with the confused attacker. They identified themselves as a "Christ follower" and a Progressive. One of us was very confused. As I explained it is impossible to refer to one's self as "having a relationship with Christ" and support a most ungodly foundation. One even had either the ignorance or audacity to state their is nothing in the bible condemning abortion.

I observed several comments around the internet where the Progressives hang out and exchange their wisdom---calling me a "Troll". A troll has commonly been known as a liberal (or Progressive) who joins a group or befriends Patriots so they can attempt the same attacks in hopes of discrediting their oppinion through lies. They ignorantly call me a troll because I joined their group to obtain facts about their beliefs, rather than fabricate as do they.
****
The moral of the story is- many are being duped into joining this evil, deceptive, 'stepping stone' to Communism and agenda to REFORM our country. Whether out of ignorance, as they only go as far as the deceptive introduction, or out of confusion for what they believe in, the majority of coffeepartiers have no idea what they are doing there. If they believe it is a way to be heard, they must understand not to stray from the (dictatorial) agenda, or they will be silenced.

See also: Coffee Party: A Progressive Brew

The Coffee Party: A "Progressive" Brew

2010-03-04T03:55:00.000-08:00

Update: CAUTION! My last visit to Coffee Party website revealed "malicious software" has been installed...

MISSION: The Coffee Party Movement gives voice to Americans who want to see cooperation in government. We recognize that the federal government is not the enemy of the people, but the expression of our collective will, and that we must participate in the democratic process in order to address the challenges that we face as Americans. As voters and grassroots volunteers, we will support leaders who work toward positive solutions, and hold accountable those who obstruct them.
-----------------------------

Above is the mission statement of the Coffee Party Movement (website). Starting as a facebook page February 9, just three weeks ago, the "movement" now has chapters all over the U.S. and, as of the time this article was written, nearly 70,000 followers. A national conference is scheduled.

Join The Coffee Party Movement facebook page was supposedly the brainchild of Annabel Park, 41, from Korea, and supposedly a grassroots effort. Ms Park worked for the Obama campaign. The page was in response to her being "Furious" over the success of the Tea Party Patriots. At first, the page has a very patriotic, 'individual liberty' sort of feel to it. Even after reading some of the "notes" posted to inform people what the group is about, it is flavored with quotes and rhetoric would appeal to any American.

There is quotes from the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence. As you read further back, closer to its induction, the message becomes quite clear: All Americans should have a voice---to defend Barack Obama. It is clearly an Obama cult. It states people should "get out of the way and let the government take care of us."

"Engage the government not as an enemy but as the collective will of the people, push leaders to enact the progressive change for which 52.9 percent of the country voted in 2008." Wait! It gets a lot better...

Like a walk down 'memory lane' with Janeane Garofalo and MSNBC...the whole basis for this movement is to attack anyone who obstructs Obama's plans, and all Tea Party Patriots are racists. There are professional videos, and already appeared on CNN's Morning Show and articles highly promoting it on the CNN Blog. Three weeks! Tea Party had over a million show up in Washington D.C. and barely got a mention.

"A better world is possible — a world where people come before profits. That’s socialism. That’s our vision. We are the Coffee Party Party USA."

The following is a 'call to arms', if you will, pasted (unedited) from a Coffee party post, NOT a public forum, on Feb 9. Let me repeat that for liberals who cannot seem to understand- The following was copied and pasted unedited from administrator only area of the site:

· All community, civic and faith leaders to call on their constituents and congregations to judge the President’s programs in a deliberate and even-handed way, and to ensure they are not unduly influenced by the racial attitudes that many of us were raised with;

· All elected officials to refrain from apocalyptic and incendiary rhetoric that feeds the idea that the Obama Administration is somehow radically different from previous U.S. Administrations, an idea which factually baseless and which is driven by racial myths;

· All media to effectively cover the extent to which the Teapartyists reflect the racial attitudes that they were raised with, as well as to clearly identify those especially despicable individuals who are manipulating ugly emotions and attitudes for political and financial gain;

· All those who support progress towards racial justice to speak up against the Teapartyist phenomenon as the current expression of longstanding racist attitudes in this nation;

· All those who wish to see the President succeed not just to stand by him, but to actively defend all those who are attacked on his behalf, and to actively push for the progressive decisions that can make his Presidency’s accomplishments historic;

· And above all, we call on all Americans to remember that we are united in a nation that is a great and ongoing experiment, that no one guaranteed it would be painless, but that we have the ability, if we so choose, to reject the errors of the past, and rise once more even closer to our centuries old goal of “liberty and justice for all.”

Call to order:
(1)We need to emphasize the racism in the Tea Party movement. It is logical for white people over 55 (I am one) to react intensely to a Black President. Let's keep reminding everyone that many of us were raised in the Jim Crow era, and naturally respond irrationally to a Black President, especially at first.

(2)We need to keep doing our organizing on all our issues. People who have the experience of winning through effective organizing on issues that matter to them will not give any support to the Tea Party movement.

(3)We need to bring out the corruption in Tea Partyism, such as the involvement of the health insurance industry.

(4) We need to defend our own from them. We failed to do this when Van Jones was attacked. We have done a so-so job with ACORN. The main power of the Tea Partyists is negative -- to take down progressive leadership. We must fight hard to take this power away from them.

*************************

After researching the premise of the group and its founder, I began warning people of its deception. Initially, I received confused and even argumentative responses. I learned that conservatives were duped into joining the group, as they didn't read beyond the introduction, and thought it was "harmless".

I believe most of the 70,000 joined out of ignorance, "For which it stands." The word progressive is used dozens of times in reference to the government, and "their" leaders. Glenn Beck has been on a "Progressive" kick, as of late. Months ago, Mr Beck was very clear on his stand that Obama was at least a Socialist.

I have heard enough "tags" for what Obama's political stand is to make my nose bleed. From Maoist to Marxist to Progressive...ITS ALL COMMUNISM!!!

"Progressive" is a positive connotation for an evil agenda, much the same as "Pro-choice" is for murder, or genocide. The Nazis gave communism a very bad name. The goal of the U.S. for about seventy years has been to defeat communism all over the world. "Progressive" is just a more politically correct label for those of whom are loyal to the communist ideology. Socialism is merely the 'stepping stones' to communism.

I very much respect Glenn Beck, but, as much as he preaches against "political correctness", his avoiding the truth of Obama's agenda is quite dangerous. The leftists hope to appeal to the uninformed, convincing them capitalism is evil and Conservatives want to deprive them. If we continue to play the politically correct game, America loses.

"Americans will never give up their Capitalism and jump into Communism, but, convince their leaders to feed them a little Socialism at a time, and they will one day awake in Communism."~~~Nikita Khrushchev, former leader of the Soviet Union.

At 1:35 in the following video is Park, supposed creator of Coffee Party, in a group of people chanting "Obama" over and over, as though in a trance

Harry Refuses To Lay Down (Fake Teaparty Attempt)

2010-02-27T23:01:00.000-08:00

Harry Reid Tries to Split Conservative Vote with "Fake" Tea Party Group

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) is running scared - and now he's sunk to a new low!

Falling increasingly behind in the polls, Reid's cronies have reportedly launched a fake new "Tea Party" political party being formed to help Harry Reid save his re-election bid.

The fake "Tea Party" is apparently a scam to split the conservative vote in November, and thus provide a means for Reid to win re-election.

The leader of this fake "Nevada Tea Party" is a 2008 Obama supporter who represents male porn star John Wayne Bobbitt. Remember him? His wife was Lorena Bobbitt, and she made an alteration to his body below the belt - enough said.

Nice try Harry Reid. But we here at the Tea Party Express are going to overcome each and every obstacle and dirty trick that Harry Reid throws at us, and we invite you to join along as we fight back! And try as he might, we aren't going to back down, go away or be defeated.

YOU CAN HELP "DEFEAT" HARRY REID!

We're about to launch the 3rd wave of our "Defeat Harry Reid" TV ads, and we need your support to win this campaign. Our budget is $200,000 for this ad campaign that begins on March 27th. So far we've raised $44,300, which means we still have $155,700 left to raise by March 27th!

And we only have until March 27th to raise it and go on the airwaves with our "Defeat Harry Reid" ads. Please make a contribution to this effort - HERE.

WE'RE COMING FOR YOU HARRY!!!

On March 27th we launch the "Showdown in Searchlight" kickoff to the Tea Party Express III: Just Vote Them Out tour with a giant rally in Sen. Reid's tiny hometown of Searchlight, Nevada. You need to be there for this huge and historic event.

If you have not already made plans to go, we ask you to please do what you can to come. This will be one of the largest political events of the year, and we need a huge sea of people there to help us fight to "Defeat Harry Reid!"

Complete details on the "Showdown in Searchlight" can be found - HERE.

Fox News describes Tea Party Express III and the "Showdown in Searchlight" targeting Harry Reid as the most ambitious tea party effort planned in 2010:

CLICK HERE TO SEE A MAP OF CITIES ON THE TRIP

The final stop will be Washington, D.C. on tax day, April 15. I hope many of you can be there to show strength in opposition to the current take over of your rights.

Is It Important? Do Not Dismiss So Quickly

2010-02-24T16:36:00.000-08:00

The Internet is abuzz with comparisons of the "strikingly similar" logos of the U.S. Missile Defense Agency and the ubiquitous Obama 2008 campaign.

The Missile Defense Agency, which is part of the Defense Department, now features a circular red, white and blue logo on its Web site that has been characterized in some reports as "scarily" similar to President Obama's former campaign symbol. Others have noted that it has a crescent and star design, evoking a common symbol for Islam. (Read More about symbol)

Many are saying this is insignificant as it was designed two years ago. It is suggested we should just dismiss it as a conspiracy theory, and worry about more important things. Perspective is everything! For instance, I do not see a symbol, I see an agenda, with a goal to strangle us.

The Fight 93 Memorial, to honor the heroes gave their lives so the jet they were in would not become another deadly weapon, has been desecrated with the Islamic Crescent Symbol. Due to lack of interest and opposition, construction has begun to ultimately place homage to the very evil of which killed so many of our citizens.

The Flight 93 Memorial was designed 4 years ago, but, it is ludicrous none-the-less. We must change our idea of what is important, or we will lose the battle by default, as we failed to show up.

I recommend for ALL to read Saul Alinsky's Rules For Radicals. Obama taught this to his students. The Clinton's and Obama have publicly praised this road map to communism. WE MUST battle "more like them" if we are to win. I don't mean we give up our principles and morals, but, their main strategy is to use our values against us and convince others (and even ourselves) we are doing something wrong (politically incorrect) if we CALL IT LIKE IT IS. That's how their agenda will devour us, when its too late to CHANGE ANYTHING!!!

The experts are all warning of an economic collapse like never before, but, the general public chooses to believe politicians, which whom, have lied all the way...

There is a consorted effort to create a crisis so as to introduce the ONLY fix---the global dollar. It has been minted, reported, and even displayed proudly by Russian officials at the G-8 summit...But people want to buy the rhetoric "its all conspiracy theory". That is what the global elite are counting on, because once it happens it will be too late. We will accept ANYTHING as a solution to get food flowing again----to the middle class!!!

If it walks like a communist duck, talks like a communist duck (and was raised by, and hangs with communist ducks) listen to your common sense, and not the rhetoric... IT'S A COMMUNIST DUCK!!!

Calling a spade a spade is not name calling- its facing reality so we aren't blindsided. If I need a spade, but, I ask you to bring me a rake...I'm not going to accomplish much. This is what is happening. We are dismissing what is right in our faces, and IT IS THE REAL THREAT after the smoke and mirrors.

Recently, Glen Beck, Fox News commentator, has been outspoken about Progressives. To be fair, perhaps his strategy is to drive people in that direction before he pulls off the cover and unveils the true agenda. Progressive is the politically correct acceptable term for those of whom are loyal to the communist ideology. The Nazis gave communism a 'bad name', so to speak. Obama has been very clear, publicly speaking of his "Progressive" agenda and his "Progressive friends" in Congress (the Dems). Progressive is a positive connotation for a negative (and evil) agenda, such as "Pro-choice" is to the pro-death/anti-life agenda (also communist ideology).

Even though many are waking up and getting more involved, all must realize this has been years in the planning and, for the most part, is going to require more involvement than most are willing. It will come down to EVERYONE getting involved to undo the damage done to our country. The perpetrators are not sacrificing!!! The actors are convincing. The people are gullible.

Stack's Online Suicide Note/Manifesto

2010-02-18T21:04:00.000-08:00

Austin, Texas, February 18, 2010, approximately 11 AM CST, Andrew Joseph Stack flew his plane into a suburb office building housing several IRS offices. The 53 year old software engineer uploaded his suicide note to his website app. 45 minutes before. Embeddedart.com was removed at the request of the FBI later that day. The following is page by page screen shots which may be enlarged by clicking on the images. The manifesto was titled "Well Mr Big Brother IRS Man... Take My Pound of Flesh and Sleep Well."

CLICK ON IMAGES TO ENLARGE

At approximately 9:30 AM Stack started his own house on fire. His wife and daughter had left the night before as Stack was reportedly 'acting strange'. Neighbors and friends stated Stack never expressed any political views and seemed to be a peaceful man. His manifesto ended with an anti-Capitalism statement. There is no knowledge of Stack belonging to any political groups or affilliation, however, the left immediately began screaming he was a "Teabagger" (vulgar slang referring to Tea Partiers) as he had a problem with the 'tax people'. There is no limit to how low the left will stoop.

Facebook Third Party Applications and Hackers

2010-02-13T04:49:00.000-08:00

I do not participate in third party applications on facebook or twitter- never have, as it is free gaming and greeting only so they can use your information to market you and everyone on your friend list. That is the very least of your problems...

Now, it goes even farther into actual dangerous and destructive activity involving your computer and you, AND IT GOES UNDETECTED BY THE MAJOR ANTI-VIRUS SOFTWARE. However, even though these apps are used by hackers for malicious activity, the app craze has multiplied since the attacks began almost a year ago. Aside from the hackers, this is the open and general policy of the apps companies--which you agree to when you click on [ALLOW] :

Use of Personal Information
We use the Personal Information we collect about you to provide our services and features to you, to manage and improve those services and features, and to tailor and customize our services and features to your individual needs and interests. For example, we use your ID and password to control access to your account profile; we may use your email address to send you service related communications, to provide you with customer support, and to send you information about products or services you choose to receive; we may use your birth date to determine your age so that we can direct your access to age appropriate content and advertisements; we may use information about you and your friends to make advertisements more interesting and tailored; we may disclose relevant Personal Information about you in order to help you communicate and socialize with your friends and to achieve your goal in using our services and features; your name or screen name may be disclosed through search indexes.

Sharing of Personal Information with Third Parties
We may share information about your activities, content preferences and other information with other social networks and websites which you have authorized us to connect you with or from which you have connected to us, along with those third parties that you have asked or authorized us to share your information with.

We may also provide your Personal Information to third-party service providers who contract with us to provide some of the services and features we offer to you or to help us better operate and manage our services.

*******************

If this invasion of your privacy and use of your friends is of no importance, congratulations! I didn't buy a top of the line PC so some perverted perpetrator somewhere across the world or in his mother's basement can control it, or ruin it. Because you have given permission through a trusted site, you have no firewall or virus protection. It all comes down to a few simple commands and you are theirs, forever, or until you format your hard drive. Ignorance is bliss to the hacker.

I post notices all the time regarding my lack of desire to participate, but, has always gone ignored except by a respectful few. These hackers are serious and not playing games, and they are doing it for hire, for another party. They began bragging awhile back--how easy it is to hack facebook and personal email passwords using these third party apps.

Once hacked, they can send emails to everyone on your list, FROM YOU, containing serious viruses and identification theft malware. My constant WARNINGS have fallen, for the most part, on deaf ears. Its just like Obama and his band of fools---nobody wants to believe the utmost truth, until Glenn Beck says it six months too late. As of late, the hackers got clever and scroll down with blank page entry below the short (usually just a few words) message including a "must see" link. This conseals the "REPLY" button so it appears non-existant, to hinder the attempt of warning from the savvy user to the rest of the recipients.

The hackers seem to focus on Christians, Independents, and Conservatives. As I said, they are mostly paid by another party, or entity. Facebook and Twitter are in no big hurry to stop the "easy" hacking ability, as the third party funds are quite handsome, as long as someone participates. Twitter, at least, takes some precautions to protect their users. Originally, participation only meant you allowed them to accumulate information about you and your friends. That has all changed, and as thousands fall victim to the hackers (in spite of the constant warnings) by clicking on the anonymous links (bit.ly) usually in a short message like "you gotta see this" or "a video you'll like" from people you know, facebook offers nothing. They don't charge the average user, and its like the community beach---No techs on duty/surf at your own risk.

Lately, there is a barage of wall postings, from friend's accounts, of vulgar pictures and messages. Most are embarrassed and discontinue use of apps. I have encountered some peeps (even Christians) that do not care they are placing their friends at risk and continue to blatantly keep sending the nuscence (at best) greetings that initiate the attacks. These people I defriend. I do not understand the ignorance and fascination. The problem occurs when unsuspecting recipients click on the loaded, fraudulent messages and photos to reply, or return. Once you click they own you. Some people you just can't reach!

Another facebook controvercy... Facebook’s rules are extensive and clearly listed on their “Statement of Rights” page. However there are terms used that are open to interpretation. Most specifically the nature of content posted on personal and group pages is open to scrutiny and judgment by Facebook staff; action taken by Facebook against its users sometimes appears arbitrary and harsh. Accounts are disabled or removed generally with no warning or explanation. Returning to the site and recovering one’s content can be difficult or impossible. For people with large “friends lists” or who use Facebook for professional purposes loss of their Facebook account can have unpleasant consequences. For many users especially those who access their accounts throughout the day via mobile device (blackberry, etc.) Facebook is an almost ubiquitous communications tool. Read More...

Equal Rights For All Women, Except For Women On The Right, Of Course

2010-02-08T20:00:00.000-08:00

The feminazis finally slither out of the woodwork to make a claim that would hopefully drown out the embarrassment suffered by their leftist occult. After days of overwhelming outrage prior to the Super Bowl advertisement aired, the anti-abortion message feared by the "Pro-Death" fanatics was non-existent. There was nothing in the ad by Pam Tebow that would suggest anything "Pro-Life" as we were told.

Instead, the ad merely directed people to the Focus on Family website, which strongly advocates Pro Life. Watch the short video for yourself:

The left appeared very foolish as the ad left all who saw it, including me, scratching their heads. How could they have a beef with this ad preaching anti-abortion? Desperate for some justification for their attack against the moral image which creates an abstract to their agenda, they dug up a rotting corpse (not Obama's Corps men), or at least that's what it would appear. I thought the National Organization for Women (NOW) was dead. Nobody heard a peep from the mouths of NOW during the past two years as women have been attacked repeatedly and viciously.

Terry O'Neill, President of NOW, immediately made a press release, saying the ad glorified violence against women. "I am blown away at the celebration of the violence against women in it," she said. "That’s what comes across to me even more strongly than the anti-abortion message. I myself am a survivor of domestic violence, and I don’t find it charming. I think CBS should be ashamed of itself."

Why was O'Neill not offended and outraged, and supporting all women, when Sarah Palin was told to "Go back to the kitchen, and leave the politics to men," during the campaign? Where was NOW during all the malicious attacks against an independent (but Republican) woman? When David Letterman made vulgar remarks against Palin and her children, people were looking for response from NOW mouthpieces, but, couldn't find them anywhere.

Eve Ensler, well known feminist, not so-well-known playwright (thank God), recently made a vicious attack on Palin's character, not her politics, which is what truly offends them. How can they claim to be for women's 'right to choose' but slander their choice if it does not agree with their leftist agenda? It is NOT about 'pro-choice', rather, pro-death/anti-life, or NOTHING!

The NOW website states: "Since its founding in 1966, NOW's goal has been to take action to bring about equality for all women. NOW works to eliminate discrimination and harassment in the workplace, schools, the justice system, and all other sectors of society..."

It is quite obvious the statement "ALL Women" is a falsehood, to put it lightly. NOW is Pro-homosexual and Pro-abortion, and spends vast amounts of money and time promoting those agendas and campaigning for Democrat candidates. If you are not on-board with this agenda, you don't qualify as "ALL Women". The ridiculous comments and threats made against all conservative women, including Michelle Bachmann and Carrie Prejean, who dared to state she believed marriage should remain between a man and a woman.

If NOW is indeed "pro-choice" then why do they not respect these women's choice? I guess it means you must choose THEIR choice, or your rights don't count.

This week, feminists were all over the media demanding apologies from Tiger Woods to his porn star, adulterous partner(one of 2 doz). This is what we have become? Our society is so upside down that adulterers can be bold to get in public arenas and complain about the lies they were told durring the affair---like they are victims as is the spouse they are destroying!

N.O.W. is perhaps confused as to the definition of "ALL" , as was Clinton to the definition of "THE"

Focus On The Family.com is fortunate the leftist freaks made a stink, or their ad may have gone unnoticed. It is well worth the visit! I would not have written this article if not for Terry O'Neill, THANK YOU NOW!!!

Barack Beholdin' To Boss Man(s)

2010-02-01T05:11:00.001-08:00

"Mr. Stern, I have to make water"

After Big Labor Bosses spent over one billion dollars getting Obama elected President, you could be sure that they’d seek a steep return on their investment.

Sure enough, SEIU Top Boss Andy Stern is the White House's most frequent visitor. Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis's last job was at Big Labor-front group American Rights at Work. And union bosses get top billing at high-profile Administration events.

To commemorate the union bosses' newfound friendliness with top White House politicos, *National Right To Work put together a short video on the Obama Administration's relationship with Big Labor:

* The National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation is a nonprofit, charitable organization providing free legal aid to employees whose human or civil rights have been violated by compulsory unionism abuses. The Foundation, which can be contacted toll-free at 1-800-336-3600, is assisting thousands of employees in more than 200 cases nationwide. Its web address is www.nrtw.org/.

The Foundation must rely on the voluntary support of individual Americans who believe in our cause and wish to advance our strategic litigation program. To make a fully tax-deductible donation in whatever amount, please click here.

Obama was able to usurp the office he holds only by way of "Special interests, large groups and foreign entities."

Obama is putting the pieces into place to crush every worker and every business in America under the weight of more forced unionism.

Last year, President Obama announced his intention to nominate SEIU and AFL-CIO union lawyer Craig Becker – a forced unionism extremist – to the National Labor Relations Board.

Becker’s views on the secret ballot, card check, and other key labor issues are even more radical than even a typical union boss apologist.

And after Becker refused to answer questions about his radical views, the Senate returned his nomination to the White House to reconsider – but President Obama is so determined to impose more forced unionism by any means necessary, he again nominated Becker last month.

Tomorrow, the Senate labor committee will hold hearings on Becker’s nomination, and it’s vital you and I keep applying the pressure.
HERE IS A HELPFUL TOOL TO FIND YOUR REPRESENTATIVE CONTACT

Welcome to 1-888-NO-UNION.COM, the internet's most comprehensive source for employers and employees who wish to remain or become union-free

UN Small Arms Treaty - Global Gun Control Scheme

2010-01-28T11:07:00.000-08:00

Defending the Second Amendment

Standing Up For Freedom

www.nationalgunrights.org

With willing one-world accomplices in Washington, D.C., gun-grabbers around the globe believe they have it made.

In fact, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton just announced the Obama Administration would be working hand in glove with the UN to pass a new "Small Arms Treaty."

Disguised as legislation to help in the fight against "terrorism," "insurgency" and "international crime syndicates," the UN Small Arms Treaty is nothing more than a massive, GLOBAL gun control scheme.

Ultimately, the UN's Small Arms Treaty is designed to register, ban and CONFISCATE firearms owned by private citizens like YOU.

That's why it's vital you sign the special petition I've made up for your signature that DEMANDS your U.S. Senators vote AGAINST ratification of the UN's "Small Arms Treaty!"

So far, the gun-grabbers have successfully kept the exact wording of their new scheme under wraps.

But looking at previous versions of the UN "Small Arms Treaty," you and I can get a good idea of what's likely in the works.

If passed by the UN and ratified by the U.S. Senate, the UN "Small Arms Treaty" would almost certainly FORCE national governments to:

*** Enact tougher licensing requirements, making law-abiding citizens cut through even more bureaucratic red tape just to own a firearm legally;

*** CONFISCATE and DESTROY ALL "unauthorized" civilian firearms (all firearms owned by the government are excluded, of course);

*** BAN the trade, sale and private ownership of ALL semi-automatic weapons;

*** Create an INTERNATIONAL gun registry, setting the stage for full-scale gun CONFISCATION.
So please click here to sign the petition to your U.S. Senators before it's too late!

You see, this is NOT a fight we can afford to lose.

Ever since its founding almost 65 years ago, the United Nations has been hell-bent on bringing the United States to its knees.

To the petty dictators and one-worlders who control the UN, the U.S. isn't a "shining city on a hill" -- it's an affront to their grand totalitarian designs for the globe.

These anti-gun globalists know that so long as Americans remain free to make our own decisions without being bossed around by big government bureaucrats, they'll NEVER be able to seize the worldwide oppressive power they crave.

And the UN's apologists also know the most effective way to finally strip you and me of ALL our freedoms would be to DESTROY our gun rights.

That's why it's vital you act TODAY!

The truth is, there's no time to waste.

You and I have to be prepared for this fight to move FAST.

The fact is, the last thing the gun-grabbers in the U.N. and in Washington, D.C. want is for you and me to have time to react and mobilize gun owners to defeat this radical legislation.

They've made that mistake before, and we've made them pay, defeating EVERY attempt to ram the "Treaty on Small Arms" into law since the mid-1990s.

But this time, time won't be on our side.

In fact, we're likely to only have a few days or weeks to defeat the treaty.

Worse, there's no longer a pro-gun Republican Senate to kill ratification of the treaty.

There's no longer any Republican in the White House who has stated opposition to the treaty.

And you and I know good and well how Germany, Great Britain, France, Communist China or the rest of the anti-gun members of the United Nations are going to vote.

So our ONE AND ONLY CHANCE of stopping the UN's "Small Arms Treaty" is during the ratification process in the U.S. Senate.

As you know, it takes 67 Senate votes to ratify a treaty.

With 40 Republicans, that should be easy, right?

Unfortunately, that couldn't be further from the truth.

First, you know just as well as I do that not all the remaining Republicans in the Senate are "pro-gun" in any sense of the term.

Second, even with the partisan rancor in Washington, D.C., many GOP Senators get "queasy" about killing treaties for fear of "embarrassing" the President -- especially with "international prestige" at stake.

They look at ratifying treaties much like approving Presidents' Supreme Court nominees.

And remember, there were NINE Republicans who voted to confirm anti-gun Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor.

A dozen more GOP Senators only voted against Sotomayor after receiving massive grassroots pressure from the folks back home.

So if we're going to defeat the UN's "Small Arms Treaty" we have to turn the heat up on the U.S. Senate now before it's too late!

That's exactly where this petition comes in.

So won't you click here to sign IMMEDIATELY?

And also, if you can, I hope you'll agree to make a generous contribution of $200, $150, $100 or even just $35.

With your generous contribution, I'll immediately begin contacting Second Amendment supporters through mail, phones and e-mail to turn up the heat on targeted U.S. Senators.

Tops on the list are the "usual suspects" like Susan Collins, Olympia Snowe, Lindsay Graham and the rest of the weak-kneed Republicans in the Senate whose votes we can never count on.

I also want to begin contacting gun owners in states represented by key Democrats -- like Senators John Tester and Max Baucus of Montana, Senators Mark Warner and Jim Webb of Virginia, Senator Ben Nelson of Nebraska and Senator Mary Landrieu of Louisiana.

And finally, I've designed a "special" hard-hitting program especially for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to let Nevada gun owners know exactly what he and his anti-gun pals have planned for you and me.

Facing a tough reelection in 2010, Senator Reid knows he's already skating on thin ice with Nevada voters.

So you and I could end up putting the final nail in his political coffin -- if I can pull out all the stops.

Direct mail. Phones. E-mail. Blogs. Billboards. Guest editorials. Press conferences. Hard-hitting newspaper, radio and TV ads. The whole nine yards.

Of course, if I can raise enough resources, my goal is to expand this full program to ALL our target states.

But that's not going to be cheap, and we may not have much time.

In fact, if we're going to defeat the UN's so-called "Small Arms Treaty," we have to start NOW!

So please click here to sign the petition to your U.S. Senators.

And if you possibly can, please agree to make a contribution of $200, $150, $100, or even just $35.

Every petition and every dollar count in this fight.

So please sign the petition and include your most generous contribution of $200, $150, $100 or $35 TODAY.

In Liberty,

Dudley Brown
Executive Director
National Association for Gun Rights

P.S. The Obama Administration just announced they would be working hand in glove with the UN to pass a new GLOBAL, "Small Arms Treaty."

That's why its vital you and I fight back IMMEDIATELY.

Please click here to sign the special petition I've made up for your signature that DEMANDS your U.S. Senators vote AGAINST ratification of the UN's "Small Arms Treaty."

FIRST THEY DISARM YOU, THEN THEY CONTROL YOU!!!

Airport Profiling/Take the Profiling Test

2010-01-23T11:16:00.000-08:00

Senator's call to profile angers 'Muslim Mafia'.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations' Oklahoma chapter is calling on Sen. James Inhofe, R.-Okla., to meet with Muslim leaders to discuss his statement during a congressional hearing in favor of using religion and ethnicity as factors in profiling airline passengers. Read the latest now on WND.com.

A Fox News guest proposed having a "Muslims only" line for airport travelers, an idea that "Dayside" co-host Mike Jerrick called attention to it so that viewers did not overlook the proposal.

Conservative radio host Mike Gallagher suggested the idea during a segment Tuesday (August 15, 2006) with constitutional lawyer Michael Gross discussing racial profiling.

"Dayside" co-host Juliet Huddy set up the debate by noting that all terrorists have been Muslim extremists, and Jerrick claimed that some people oppose racial profiling as "politically incorrect."
"It’s not just a matter of political correctness, please," responded Gross. "It’s illegal, it’s unconstitutional, unethical, immoral, it shouldn’t be done. We do not in this country prejudge a person based upon their race, creed, color, country of national origin and it’s wrong to do so and it addition it’s not effective. It doesn’t work. It actually perpetuates the problem. That is, it separates us."

Gallagher responded that Gross's statements were "absolutely absurd" and claimed that the Traffic Safety Administration is aggressively targeting uniformed members of the military. "Let's have a Muslim-only line," Gallagher said, as Gross started to talk. Jerrick asked Gallagher to repeat what he said.

"It’s time to have a Muslims check-point line in America’s airports and have Muslims be scrutinized. You better believe it, it’s time," Gallagher said, garnering tepid audience applause.

Gross attacked the proposal as "absolutely wrong" because "most Arabs are not Muslims, most Muslims are not Arabs. You don't even have your facts straight. How would you feel if we had a line for the Irish, which the English proposed during the IRA problems?" He pleaded not to turn the United States into a "tyrannical, imperial country." Still, a woman in the audience asked a question about being "politically correct" by not allowing racial profiling.

Gallagher claimed that opposition to racial profiling amounted to not wanting to hurt people's feelings.

"Most Americans want prejudice. Let’s be prejudiced against those who want to slaughter innocent American men, women and children. It’s time we start exercising some prejudice and stop these bloody terrorists," Gallagher said, this time drawing more robust applause.

I have no knowledge of any other organization, political or religious, which is regularly boarding planes to use as weapons against innocents. Islam masquerades as a religion, but, in reality is nothing but a political agenda for oppression of all humanity. I know of no other group willing to run around with bombs in their butts in order to kill innocent men, women and children.

A lot of Americans have become so insulated from reality…

Absolutely No Profiling? Pause a moment, reflect back, and take the following multiple choice test.

These events are actual events from history.. They really happened! Do you remember?

HERE'S THE TEST

1. 1968 Bobby Kennedy was shot and killed by:

a.. Superman

b. Jay Leno

c. Harry Potter

d. A Muslim male extremist between the ages of 17 and 40

2. In 1972 at the Munich Olympics, athletes were kidnapped and massacred by :

a. Olga Corbett

b. Sitting Bull

c.. Arnold Schwarzenegger

d.. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

3. In 1979, the US embassy in Iran was taken over by:

a. Lost Norwegians

b. Elvis

c. A tour bus full of 80-year-old women

d . Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

4. During the 1980's a number of Americans were kidnapped in Lebanon by:

a. John Dillinger

b. The King of Sweden

c. The Boy Scouts

d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

5. In 1983, the US Marine barracks in Beirut was blown up by:

a. A pizza delivery boy

b. Pee Wee Herman

c.. Geraldo Rivera

d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

6. In 1985 the cruise ship Achille Lauro was hijacked and a 70 year old American passenger was murdered and thrown overboard in his wheelchair by:

a. The Smurfs

b. Davey Jones

c. The Little Mermaid

d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

7. In 1985 TWA flight 847 was hijacked at Athens , and a US Navy diver trying to rescue passengers was murdered by:

a. Captain Kidd

b. Charles Lindberg

c. Mother Teresa

d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

8. In 1988, Pan Am Flight 103 was bombed by:

a. Scooby Doo

b. The Tooth Fairy

c. The Sundance Kid

d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

9. In 1993 the World Trade Center was bombed the first time by:

a. Richard Simmons

b. Grandma Moses

c. Michael Jordan

d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

10. In 1998, the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed by:

a. Mr. Rogers

b. Hillary Clinton, to distract attention from Wild Bill's women problems

c. The World Wrestling Federation

d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

11. On 9/11/01, four airliners were hijacked; two were used as missiles to take out the World Trade Centers and of the remaining two, one crashed into the US Pentagon and the other was diverted and crashed by the passengers.

Thousands of people were killed by:

a. Bugs Bunny, Wiley E. Coyote, Daffy Duck and Elmer Fudd

b. The Supreme Court of Florida

c. Mr Bean

d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

12. In 2002 the United States fought a war in Afghanistan against:

a. Enron

b. The Lutheran Church

c. The NFL

d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

13. In 2002 reporter Daniel Pearl was kidnapped and murdered by:

a. Bonnie and Clyde

b. Captain Kangaroo

c. Billy Graham

d.. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

No, I really don't see a pattern here to justify profiling, do you? So, to ensure we Americans never offend anyone, particularly fanatics intent on killing us, airport security screeners will no longer be allowed to profile certain people.. They must conduct random searches of 80-year-old women, little kids, airline pilots with proper identification, secret agents who are members of the President's security detail, 85-year old Congressmen with metal hips, and Medal of Honor winner and former Governor Joe Foss, but leave Muslim Males between the ages 17 and 40 alone lest they be guilty of profiling.

Foot note: Fort Hood Texas ......another Muslim 39 years old killed 13 people and wounded 30 some odd others... Does this fit the profile!

NOW OUR COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF IS TELLING EVERYONE

THAT THE YOUNG MUSLIM THAT ATTEMPTED TO BLOW

UP A NORTHWEST/DELTA JET AS IT APPROACHED DETROIT

ON CHRISTMAS DAY WAS (QUOTE) "AN ISOLATED INCIDENT".

YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME OR WHAT?!! MY FATHER

USE TO SAY: "PLEASE DON'T PISS ON MY LEG AND TELL

ME IT'S RAINING."

ALERT: Female suicide bombers may be heading here from Yemen (READ)

Hint Of Team For 2012?

2010-01-20T10:29:00.000-08:00

U.S. Representative Michele Bachmann (MN-06) announced today that former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin will come to Minnesota to assist Bachmann's re-election campaign on April 7, 2010.

"There is absolutely no one more in tune with the hearts and minds of everyday Americans than Governor Palin, and I'm excited to welcome her back to our beautiful state this spring," Bachmann said.

Both Governor Palin and Congresswoman Bachmann are well-known and respected conservative leaders whose bold and unwavering stances in defending the U.S. Constitution and commonsense approaches to issues like health care, taxes and government bailouts have attracted millions to their message.

"It didn't take the American people long to see through the extreme liberal agenda of President Obama and his Democratic allies in Congress," Bachmann said. "We saw American's frustration start in the form of tea party protests in states from coast to coast. It continued with the health care town halls throughout last summer. But we saw it come into full focus yesterday in conservative Scott Brown's victory in Massachusetts, taking back a Senate seat that was held by Democratic Senator Ted Kennedy for decades. The American people have spoken, and the momentum is clearly at the backs of conservatives heading into the 2010 elections."

Details about Governor Palin's visit will be released as they become available. In the coming weeks, please visit www.michelebachmann.com for more information.

Note: Not Endorsed by National Organization of Women (N.O.W.)

Obama vs Constitution/Upcoming Trial

2010-01-14T03:10:00.000-08:00

Upcoming Trial for Obama's Birth Certificate Dispute (click here)

Ethics Or Intimidation? Birther Judge Carter Stands To Be Recused

Little Did Muhammed Know...

2010-01-10T09:48:00.001-08:00

...HOW DEDICATED THEY WOULD BECOME!!!

The Muslim Candle

I could not resist any longer. As the controversy still rolls on, I must comment on the "Butt Bomber". The media has come up with "underpants bomber", crotch bomb, fire crotch, and more, to be polite. I, however, am so thoroughly sick of the political correctness crap, any hint of turning reality into rhetoric makes me twitch. I'm seeking help from a therapy group.

*THE BOMB WAS IN HIS BUTT*

The Islam community became outraged and has actually spent millions on advertisements, propaganda, and even hit squads, all over the famous cartoon of a bomb in Muhammad's turban. I thought it was a subtle but true perspective of what Muhammad started. I couldn't understand why the Islamic world reacted as it did. 1.) Islam made the cartoon well known, when no one would have remembered it, and 2.) The reality is so much more perverted and twisted when it comes to Islam.

White House counterterrorism adviser John Brennan was briefed in October on an assassination attempt by Al Qaeda that investigators now believe used the same underwear bombing technique as the Nigerian suspect who tried to blow up Northwest Airlines Flight 253 on Christmas Day, U.S. intelligence and administration officials told NEWSWEEK.

The briefing to Brennan was delivered at the White House by Muhammad bin Nayef, Saudi Arabia’s chief counterterrorism official. In late August, Nayef had survived an assassination attempt by an operative dispatched by the Yemeni branch of Al Qaeda who was pretending to turn himself in. The operative had tried to kill the Saudi prince by detonating a bomb on his body, but stumbled on his way into the prince's palace and blew himself up.

Umar Farouk Abdolmutallab's father warned the Embassy his son was involved with terrorist organizations and people were going to die. There was documented ties to al Qaeda. Umar was allowed to board an international airliner (flight 253) with almost 300 passengers to arrive in the U.S. WITHOUT a passport. Does this make your conspiracy alarms go off? That's normal---its what helps us find solutions.

Had it not been for an alert passenger willing to take action, a catastrophe would have taken place. There was a technical difficulty with a detonator and it lit up Umar's crotch. I will not literally draw the picture, but, I am in communications and negotiations with key people in hopes to honor Islam appropriately.

Since we have the Islamic symbols at the Memorial for Flight 93 , Americans who died because of Islam, I believe Umar and the entire Nation of Islam should be acknowledged for what they are willing to do in order to force their will on an entire globe. I ask only that you show your support in honoring this bold young muslim who puts dignity aside for such a noble cause of killing hundreds of innocents out of dedication to his koran, even though it was a failed attempt. All the more better to celebrate the notion.

Please support us in changing the name of the most popular fireworks from Roman Candle to Muslim Candle. (CAUTION: flames from bottom of projectile)

I figure it wouldn't be hard for you to sketch a mental image...however, we advise do not attempt to stick a Roman Candle in your butt as a form of mocking Umar---this can be very dangerous!!!

Hopefully, every time someone lights a 'Muslim Candle' for freedom, they will think of not just Umar, but, the entire Islamic Nation for giving it a go to take away those freedoms and oppress a globe. (freaky little muslims)

It is sickening to read the excuses made by and for the liberals which are the major cause for breakdowns in both security and foreign relations (respect). The lunacy of a Janet Napolitano, who focused everything on our returning soldiers and labeled them, and conservative citizens as being a threat to the country, stating, "The system worked," in thwarting this potential catastrophe. In a speech earlier in the week she told a group of people we need to find things to do for these radical 'home-grown' terrorists--- they are just bored (comparing them to graffiti 'taggers'). WHAT DOES SHE HAVE ON OBAMA?

C.A.I.R. is filing suits claiming muslims should not be discriminated against for their religious beliefs. Really?!! You mean the religion which tells you to kill everyone that doesn't believe like you? That religion? Uh, get used to the discrimination as more Americans wake up!!!

I switched to CNN just to see if they had any coverage of F-16s being scrambled due to disturbance on an airliner and they are STILL going on about muslims being inconvenienced @ airports. TO ALL MUSLIMS: either do not fly to U.S. or shut up and take it off. You are the only ones running around with bombs in your butts. FREAKS!!!

If you don't like profiling, start talking to your jihad brothers and stop the madness...don't complain to the people you are blowing up - it's so uncouth! Unfortunately, for you, Baptists are not running around with bombs in their butts, only muslims. Why should we look anywhere else? Why should we NOT inconvenience you? Why should you not show your butt on demand? You do it freely all the time.

I offer this suggestion--- don't fly to the U.S. if you do not wish to be singled out for questioning, as you would in any other country which deemed you suspicious. You know you can make noise and attempt to use our laws against us and for your radical agenda. If you do not like being 'profiled' I suggest you talk to your jihad brothers and CHANGE IT!!! Don't complain to me, and don't expect twisted 'political correctness' to keep bailing you out, as many Americans are waking up.

Just as Japan did, you are awakening a sleeping giant. The apathy will be replaced by patriotism and we will end up bailing out the rest of the planet from the assault of your sickness.

The muslims are now calling it opression, as we dare to take measures to stop them from killing us for not believing THEIR way. Attorneys General all over the U.S. are afraid to take measures to stop jihad training camps, as they claim it is their religious expression. (But they spend millions to remove Jesus)

The muslims claim Christians and Jews are such bad people they need to die. The fact is, I know of no Jews or Christians running around with bombs in their butts, but, if I did I would report them and expect them to be 'jacked up' at airports, in order to protect the innocent-- no matter what the cause.

Well Mr. Obama, you've aided and abetted the enemy in hopes they would like you and not attack us on your 'watch'; Guess what---they are still devoted to their koran which tells them to kill us. You thought you were so much smarter than all the experts pleading with you - YOU CANNOT NEGOTIATE WITH TERRORISTS!!!

A dozen Pakistani Muslim extremists in Lahore burned a Norwegian flag and chanted slogans after a Norwegian newspaper reprinted the famous Danish Mohammed cartoons and a Norwegian Member of Parliament changed his Facebook profile picture to the caricature of Mohammed with a bomb in his turban. Read More...

To KEEP YOU ABREAST of jihad's activity... MI5 hunting breast implants of death-
Authorities alarmed by possibility of surgically placed bombs

ALERT: Female suicide bombers may be heading here from Yemen (Read)

AIRPORT PROFILING/TAKE THE PROFILING TEST

Government Against The People

2010-01-07T10:46:00.000-08:00

Now that the tax-hungry Maoists we call 'Congress' makes its way back to Washington after the Christmas break, the charlatans who supposedly 'represent the people' are set to ram through government-controlled healthcare.

The fact is these people do not represent the citizens at all. Citizens have made it abundantly clear in poll after poll, in Town Hall meetings, and in Tea Party protests that they do not want this 2 trillion dollar government takeover of 1/3 of the nation's economy. Read more at the Examiner

A message from Michael Connelly, Retired attorney, Constitutional Law Instructor,
Carrollton , Texas :
Well, I have done it! I have read the entire text of proposed House Bill 3200 (pdf): The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009. I studied it with particular emphasis from my area of expertise, constitutional law. I was frankly concerned that parts of the proposed law that were being discussed might be unconstitutional. What I found was far worse than what I had heard or expected.

To begin with, much of what has been said about the law and its implications is in fact true, despite what the Democrats and the media are saying. The law does provide for rationing of health care, particularly where senior citizens and other classes of citizens are involved, free health care for illegal immigrants, free abortion services, and probably forced participation in abortions by members of the medical profession.

The Bill will also eventually force private insurance companies out of business, and put everyone into a government run system. All decisions about personal health care will ultimately be made by federal bureaucrats, and most of them will not be health care professionals. Hospital admissions, payments to physicians, and allocations of necessary medical devices will be strictly controlled by the government.

However, as scary as all of that is, it just scratches the surface. In fact, I have concluded that this legislation really has no intention of providing affordable health care choices. Instead it is a convenient cover for the most massive transfer of power to the Executive Branch of government that has ever occurred, or even been contemplated If this law or a similar one is adopted, major portions of the Constitution of the United States will effectively have been destroyed.

The first thing to go will be the masterfully crafted balance of power between the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the U.S. Government. The Congress will be transferring to the Obama Administration authority in a number of different areas over the lives of the American people, and the businesses they own.

The irony is that the Congress doesn't have any authority to legislate in most of those areas to begin with! I defy anyone to read the text of the U.S. Constitution and find any authority granted to the members of Congress to regulate health care.

This legislation also provides for access, by the appointees of the Obama administration, of all of your personal healthcare direct violation of the specific provisions of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution information, your personal financial information, and the information of your employer, physician, and hospital. All of this is a protecting against unreasonable searches and seizures. You can also forget about the right to privacy. That will have been legislated into oblivion regardless of what the 3rd and 4th Amendments may provide.

If you decide not to have healthcare insurance, or if you have private insurance that is not deemed acceptable to the Health Choices Administrator appointed by Obama, there will be a tax imposed on you. It is called a tax instead of a fine because of the intent to avoid application of the due process clause of the 5th Amendment. However, that doesn't work because since there is nothing in the law that allows you to contest or appeal the imposition of the tax, it is definitely depriving someone of property without the due process of law.

So, there are three of those pesky amendments that the far left hate so much, out the original ten in the Bill of Rights, that are effectively nullified by this law It doesn't stop there though.

The 9th Amendment that provides: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people;

The 10th Amendment states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people.. Under the provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were theirs to control.

I could write many more pages about this legislation, but I think you get the idea. This is not about health care; it is about seizing power and limiting rights. Article 6 of the Constitution requires the members of both houses of Congress to "be bound by oath or affirmation to support the Constitution." If I was a member of Congress I would not be able to vote for this legislation or anything like it, without feeling I was violating that sacred oath or affirmation. If I voted for it anyway, I would hope the American people would hold me accountable.

For those who might doubt the nature of this threat, I suggest they consult the source, the US Constitution, and Bill of Rights. There you can see exactly what we are about to have taken from us.

News came yesterday that during the 2008 campaign Barack Obama promised at least 8 times that all negotiations on healthcare reform would be done in the open, on C-Span. Today Obama has agreed, under pressure, to C-Span coverage...FOR 1 HOUR ONLY!
(Read More...)

Transparency Is In The Eye Of The Beholder (Apparently)

2010-01-04T08:44:00.000-08:00

Recently in the Washington Examiner, National Right to Work Foundation president Mark Mix discussed the Foundation’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) attack against the shadowy Obama administration, which is refusing to let the American people know more about the close connections between Department of Labor officials and Big Labor operatives.

As Mix explained, the Obama Administration has stonewalled on numerous disclosure demands, despite its promises of a new era of transparency.

After months of waiting for a response from the Department of Labor, Right to Work Foundation lawyers filed a federal lawsuit in U.S. District Court to force the Obama administration to fulfill its obligations under the Freedom of Information Act. Hopefully, this complaint will spur the Department of Labor toward greater disclosure.

The public at least deserves to know the extent to which union operatives are rewriting laws and regulations put in place to ensure minimal standards of union transparency and accountability. Read more about unions...

The National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation is a nonprofit, charitable organization providing free legal aid to employees whose human or civil rights have been violated by compulsory unionism abuses. The Foundation, which can be contacted toll-free at 1-800-336-3600, is assisting thousands of employees in more than 200 cases nationwide.

During his campaign, Obama promised unprecedented transparency. Recently, in several public speeches, he has professed his administration to be "The most transparent" administration in U.S. history. Congress Democrats continue to make public anouncements proclaiming their transparency, even as they emerge from "locked door" meetings to form strategies in manipulating bills in which the majority of the American people clearly do not want.

In recent polls, it is believed almost half the country still strongly believes Obama and the Democratic Congress is on a path for the best interest of the citizens in both economic and national security issues. Almost half of the country! This defies reason and logic.

In my research over three decades I have found a significant portion of the population enjoys corruption in public office. It becomes an excuse, if you will, for the rationalization of society's own immoral inclinations. The narcissist in many people distorts their sense of awareness to consequences.

That percentage of public acceptance and apathy to government expansion in controlling our lives increases every generation, thanks to our apathy for indoctrination of our children in school and through media. In affect, with every generation, we are becoming more stupid.

It is clear major and drastic changes must take place in order to turn the country around, but, typically Americans are not willing to leave their comfort zones and commit to measures necessary. We are not willing to do what it takes, as a whole. As a rule, "Majority rules" or the needs of the many out weigh the needs of the few. Through propaganda and politics the needs of the corrupt few are now dictating what will be the majority's needs.

We have ignored the experts and history in dealing with the economy and foreign affairs. We have come to negotiating with terrorists, supposedly in the name of "PEACE". It would be nice if the liberal fantasy of all nations holding hands and singing "Kumbaya" was possible, but, it will never be. The corrupt portions of other nations laugh at the attempt. The "Peace" initiative could not even work among those who claimed to be dedicated to forcing on the rest of the world. Through their delusion, some of the 1960's 'peace movement' became killers themselves, to make their point, of course.

Just as the economy requires drastic measures or face certain consequences, so does foreign relations. Unfortunately, Obama has taken on a negotiation stand with Islamic jihad, taking steps to lighten the burden of those who wish us harm. Now, an enemy combatant will receive all the rights and comforts as would an American citizen, even though the jihadists are killing us BECAUSE of those rights.

James Robbins of the Washington Times writes: President Obama's freshman-year foreign policy was the worst in living memory. At the dawn of 2010, the United States finds itself noticeably weaker in international affairs than it was when Mr. Obama took office, and there are no signs of improvement in the year ahead.
Read more...

Larry Klayman is suing the president for secret meetings with Planned Parenthood and other lobbyists on his plans to nationalize health care.

Klayman, founder of Judicial Watch and, more recently, Freedom Watch USA, filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., under the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The law requires disclosure of records of meetings between the executive branch and outside industry lobbyists. Klayman states Obama "violated his commitment to transparency." (Full story)

And let us not forget the most popular lawsuit of our generation, the transparency of Barack Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, regarding WHO HE IS, REALLY!!!

Winston Churchill's Christmas Eve Address, Washington, 1941

2009-12-24T06:58:00.000-08:00

Here then, for one night only, each home throughout the English-speaking world should be a brightly lighted island of happiness and peace. Let the children have their night of fun and laughter. Let the gifts of Father Christmas delight their play. Let us grown-ups share to the full in their unstinted pleasures before we turn again to the stern tasks and formidable year that lie before us. Resolved that by our sacrifice and daring these same children shall not be robbed of their inheritance or denied their right to live in a free and decent world. Read Christmas During War

Wishing You and Your Family a Very Merry Christmas!

Aiding and Abetting the Enemy

2009-12-17T05:47:00.000-08:00

just a few of the weapons seized from jihadists in America

See video below of women training to kill in New York

There are jihad camps all over the United States. The intentions of those who train in these camps are to kill Americans and destroy the American way of life (freedom). So far, the Federal government nor state officials have attempted to hinder their jihadi plans as they feel it is an expression of their religion.

Okay, so we sit and wait to be annihilated by our worst enemy because it is "politically correct?"

There are growing numbers of jihadi attacks here in the states, but, fervently whitewashed by the leftists to seem as something else. From Churches to Military facilities, jihadists are carrying out planned, calculated, fatal assaults on American citizens, and they receive nothing but consideration from our government. The victims from the satanic religion are mostly gone ignored, just as 9/11 victims are being ignored.

The consideration for the terrorist's comfort far outweighs the cries of Americans to NOT bring the mastermind of 9/11 to the crime scene for his trial. The only concern of the Obama administration is that the terrorists (foreign combatants) are given the same rights as the American citizens receive for being legal citizens. You remember, the same rights Obama apologised for all over the world. The rights in which are the sole reason for jihad to destroy us, are being enjoyed by the jihad to enable their mission.

All of the devout muslims of which believe in the Koran are jihad, whether man, woman, or child, devoted to killing Jews and Americans (or infidels). You may believe the rhetoric of 'peaceful, loving religion' all you want, but, it is a lie. You can listen to "It's just a radical few" 'til the cows come home, but, the truth is to kill Americans and Jews IS THEIR RELIGION!!!

Now our soldiers are facing criminal proceedings for encountering the enemy in the theater.

Critical evidence was withheld by prosecutors during the trial of 1LT Michael Behenna. If you believe that soldiers who fight for our constitutional rights, the right to be considered innocent until proven guilty, the right to due process of law and the right to a fair trial, we ask you to sign this petition requesting a new trial. During 1LT Behenna’s trial the government withheld evidence that their own forensic expert told them that in his opinion “the only logical explanation” for the shooting was consistent with the defense theory that the Al Qaeda terrorist was standing with his arms outstretched when the first shot was fired and not sitting on a rock as argued by the prosecutors. We believe that the prosecutors had a constitutional obligation to provide this evidence to the defense lawyers and the jury had the right to hear all the evidence before deliberating on the guilt or innocence of this soldier. Please help us obtain justice for this American Hero by signing this petition.

Three Navy Seals face court martial for capturing a top most wanted terrorist and he received a bloody lip. Read that full story here. ***PLEASE SIGN PETITION to dismiss charges against the Navy Seals

U.S. troops battle both Taliban and their own rules
The Times compiled an informal list of the new rules from interviews with U.S. forces. Among them:

• No night or surprise searches.

• Villagers have to be warned prior to searches.

• *ANA or **ANP must accompany U.S. units on searches.

• U.S. soldiers may not fire at the enemy unless the enemy is preparing to fire first.

• U.S. forces cannot engage the enemy if civilians are present.

• Only women can search women.

• Troops can fire at an insurgent if they catch him placing an IED but not if insurgents are walking away from an area where explosives have been laid.

And Most absurd of all, Obama and the leftists want terrorists, or enemy combatants, to receive Miranda rights. I cannot say THEIR Miranda Rights, because as American citizens they are OUR Miranda rights. How ludicrous is it for a foreigner, sworn to their government and in battle with our soldiers, to receive the rights in which our soldiers are dying to protect???

There is one little ray of sunshine in the domestic jihad issue.

James S Robbins of the Washington Times writes: Jihadists take note: The insanity defense may not work for you. On Tuesday, Naveed Haq, a self-styled soldier of Islam, was found guilty of aggravated first-degree murder and seven other counts related to a 2006 shooting rampage in Seattle. The prosecution successfully argued that Haq was a jihadi terrorist on a mission for martyrdom; the defense said that just proved he was crazy. Read More

*ANA- Afghan National Army **ANP- Afghan National Police

A Perversion For a Platform

2009-12-13T09:25:00.000-08:00

The National News Agencies report "Houston voters elect openly gay mayor." I don't read anywhere of any other accomplishments from Annise Parker, other than she is gay.

Gay activist groups all over the country were involved in getting Parker elected in Houston. "This election has changed the world for the gay, lesbian, bi-sexual, and transgendered community," Parker said in her speech following the concession of her opponent. Basically, the whole reason she was elected, was for her sexual preference, or as most people see it, a perversion.

The gay community prefers to accuse religious groups, most notably Christians, for opposition to their agenda to spread their propaganda and indoctrination of our children. More correctly, this is NOT a religious issue. Many of whom oppose the gay agenda are not affiliated with any religious groups. It is easier to take on the victim role, as it were, if, however, you have a specific group in which to target, such as Christians, which openly stands against them.

The Gay Political Caucus has strived for decades to make America a Caligula kingdom. They work fervently to inject their perverted lifestyles into schools and communities, aided by supposed neutral groups, like ACLU, opposing any form of religious expression, but, standing on a "freedom" platform. It seems only their views should be "free"and promoted by politicians.

If one was to merely suggest a "Bible" day, or a "Christian" day in Public Schools, their career would be over. A "gay" day was invoked, against federal law, in schools without affording parents the opportunity to opt-out. In fact, legal action was threatened against those parents which chose to keep their children home.

A California Judge's response to the parents that objected to homosexual "lessons" for their children was, "They are bigots."

The parents were represented in California's Alameda Superior Court by Pacific Justice Institute. On Dec. 1, Judge Frank Roesch denied a motion to allow them to have their children excused from the lessons.

According to the group, Roesch blasted the parents for seeking enforcement of a provision of the California Education Code that gives parents a right to opt their kids out of health education.

Education Code Section 51240 allows a parent to have a student excused from instruction, "If any part of a school's instruction in health conflicts with the religious training and beliefs of a parent or guardian of a pupil."

Just as Islamic groups are continuously breaking laws and aided by politicians in their agenda, opposition to the (gay) agenda are viewed and treated as criminals. As in so many cases, political correctness has taken the place of laws on the books, without any congressional hearings.

In the '70's, talk show hosts and journalists exploited gay individuals and proclaimed how "proud" they were for their "coming out of the closet." It is a sexual preference (perversion); What was wrong with it staying in the closet? Or, in their bedrooms? Why is society graced with their perversion?

They counted on our apathy and political correctness to force the will and whims of a few on an entire nation...

Can you imagine demanding special rights based on your heterosexuality (and you are the majority) ?

Can you imagine heterosexual Joe Studdley running for office based on what a fantastic lover he is, as his only qualification???

Kanye Does It Again, This Time Cheered

2009-12-06T10:42:00.000-08:00

(DI) March 8, 2010, Last night at the 2010 Academy Awards Kanye West jumped up on stage and snatched the Oscar out of Al Gore's hand, just as he was preparing to give his acceptance speech. West was under great scrutiny whether to be allowed in the award ceremony after a vulgar display of similar proportions at last year's VMA '09 Awards, where he interrupted Taylor Swift's speech.

The Academy decided after great debate to allow West to attend, in light of their outrageous decision to allow Gore to attend, in fear of discriminatory reprisal. West's previous uncouth and low class action against Ms Swift was answered by vast disapproval, even by President Obama, calling him an "A-hole".

Last night, however, Kanye was treated as a hero after he waved Gore's Oscar and yelled, "This is for the Hackers!" West's interruption came as a shock to many as he is a liberal, but, it has been reported many liberals have recently awakened to the enormous deception by the Leftists to "sucker" the ideological citizens to promote their Oligarchy take over of America in hopes of a New World Order.

In other news, President Obama's address to America just prior to the Academy Awards which was televised only on MSNBC, earned the lowest ratings of any televised broadcast of any kind in television history. In light of early released reports of his arrest forthcoming, his speech was watched by seven fewer viewers than the Awards, which now holds the second worst televised rating in history.

And The Nobel Prize Goes To... The Hacker!

2009-12-04T08:38:00.000-08:00

Al Gore cancels his Copenhagen lecture where Obama was to sign a treaty with United Nations which would dissolve our Constitutional way of governing.

***

Gore won an Oscar two years ago for the film, "An Inconvenient Truth", which does nothing more than spout a political ideology couched in a chicken-little 'the sky is falling' format on the looming catastrophe of 'global warming.' The star of the falsified climate numbers now known as 'Climategate' is being pressured by Hollywood conservatives to give up the Oscar he received for a film that perpetrates the hoax.

Global-Warming Theology: The end is nigh, their god is dead! Belief in global warming had long had a tinge of theology about it, a form of cultism that adherents and defenders elevated to a holy crusade. Read more on (Theology)

The Nobel Prize should be turned over to the hackers... by Al, in a public ceremony.

When the “Cap and Trade” bill was introduced earlier this year, a swarm of scientists from around the world presented factual evidence to the contrary of Al Gore’s claim the world would end and Polar bears will die. Real, reputable, credible scientists pleaded the con of “global warming” with solid, proven facts. I presented videos, interviews, and articles disproving the theory the glaciers were dwindling. Unfortunately, however, most, even many Republicans, chose to believe money and power hungry politicians over science.

But, thanks to hackers, emails were intercepted which definitely and directly exposed the intent to deceive the American public. Whatever it took as long as it finally became accepted, the scam was revealed. A handful of Republicans called for an investigation as to the validity of the “end of the world” farce, which has netted Mr. Gore over $1 billion and a Nobel Peace Prize.

The “Cap and Trade” bill passed Congress with the help of several R.I.N.O.’s. The whole intent of the bill, as is with “Health Care Reform” and Union Labor legislation, is to grease the gears of the “Engine To Socialism”. A consorted effort between elitists, the politicians in their pockets, and corrupt labor bosses, was to gain complete control over large corporations and the American public.

It has been common knowledge for two decades our entitlement programs were robbed by corruption and being depleted at an accelerated rate, totally bankrupting Social Security in a few years. The Unions have been stealing from pension funds to promote their political agendas for years, also common knowledge. They have been “Robbing Peter to pay Paul” for sometime now, anticipating the day when they would have complete control over the nations workforce, without freedom of choice by Americans.

With both the government and the unions in bed together for the purpose of avoiding prosecution for theft of American’s money, they were confident their communist agenda would be reality very soon. With the help of Globalists with deep pockets and strings on virtually every politician in Washington, The New World Order appeared to be immanent. A financial crisis was in order. The decline of the American dollar on a daily basis, almost certainly showed promise toward a complete collapse. With most of the country wondering how they will eat tonight, the global dollar would be introduced with little to no objection.

A crisis was the only answer to cover up the vast corruption. Make people wonder where their next meal is coming from and ANYTHING will be acceptable. Knowing their would be some friction, the leftists began smear campaigns against every conservative and public airwaves which had an opposing view. Deny, deny, deny. Call names and throw dirt through every medium possible while RUSHING as many bills and issues possible so as to keep everyone so busy they cannot catch up. Right in the middle of one campaign, another issue pops up, and another, and another, until it was virtually impossible to focus on both hands. “Watch this hand” while I rob you with the other.

The scoundrels are being exposed. Charges will be brought against some to “get release” but the real perpetrators, like Al Gore, will slither off and fade away, as they will become a total embarrassment to those of whom were taken in and will save their pride any further assault.

I am confident people will continue to awaken and discern from those who truly care and those looking to line their pockets with our lives, and our children's future. In addition to returning all awards and at least (performing) an official public apology, I am calling for restitution to be made concerning all moneys gained through this hoax, especially tax gains and support.

You Can't Negotiate With Terrorists

2009-11-28T04:50:00.000-08:00

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu weakened Israel this week. And he did so for no good reason.

Thursday’s headlines told the tale. The day after Netanyahu bowed to US pressure and announced a total freeze on Jewish construction in Judea and Samaria for ten months, Yediot Aharonot reported that the Obama administration now wants Israel to release a thousand Fatah terrorists from prison.

The Americans also want Israel to allow US-trained, terror-supporting Fatah paramilitary forces to deploy in areas that are currently under Israeli military control. Moreover, the Americans are demanding that Israel surrender land in the strategically crucial Jordan Valley to Fatah.

And these are just American preconditions for starting negotiations with the Palestinians. According to Yediot, if those talks ever begin, the White House will demand that Israel accept a Palestinian state in Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria and Gaza and agree to ethnically cleanse all the areas of Jews.

So far from winning American support or at least causing the White House to ease its bullying, US President Barack Obama sees Netanyahu’s decision to implement a militarily irrational, bigoted policy of prohibiting Jews from building in Israel’s heartland as a drop in the bucket.
Read more on Jerusalem Post

Abbas says Israeli settlement freeze not enough... CARACAS, Venezuela — Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas dismissed an Israeli plan to halt new construction of West Bank settlements as insufficient on Friday, saying it won't be enough to restart peace talks.

The Palestinian president said during his first visit to Venezuela that "we can't accept the current Israeli government's concept for the negotiations."

The Palestinian leader was to meet on Friday with Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, who has stepped squarely into Middle East politics this week by hosting both Abbas and the president of Iran.

Chavez denounced Israel as "a murderous arm of the Yankee empire" during a visit Wednesday by Iran's Mahmoud Ahmanuhtjob.

Chavez has been strengthening ties with Israel's adversaries while trading verbal barbs with Israeli President Shimon Peres, who predicted last week in Argentina that the people of Venezuela and Iran will soon get rid of their leaders.

All the terrorists around the world are boldly meeting and strengthening ties with dictators in our own part of the world, supported by their biggest ally, Barack Hussein Obama.

Chavez and Ahmanuhtjob have business relations in over 120 projects. Why would Iran worry about U.S. sanctions?

The True Reason For Thanksgiving

2009-11-25T06:22:00.000-08:00

As we all prepare for Thanksgiving, I thought you might enjoy reading a column Mary Beth (my wife) penned this week on the true meaning of Thanksgiving. Enjoy and Happy Thanksgiving!

The True Reason for Thanksgiving

Over time, myths and distortions have arisen, twisting the reason for Thanksgiving Day. For starters, the Pilgrims did not hold their harvest festival to thank the local Indians. Unfortunately, this myth is often perpetuated in schools and textbooks. Many children and adults now believe we celebrate the help given to the Pilgrims by Native Americans. If the Pilgrims were to visit this Thanksgiving, they would be shocked.

The Pilgrims focused on thanking and praising God for His love, for all that He had done for them, and for the freedom they enjoyed in the New World.

A glimpse into the history of Thanksgiving Day gives a greater appreciation of this great American holiday. Even earlier than the Pilgrims, people of faith set aside days for prayer and thanksgiving to God. Many times rather than a feast, they were a time dedicated to prayer.

It may come as a surprise to some that the word holiday is actually from old English compound word combining holy and day. Merriam-Webster dictionary defines holiday as “a day set aside for special religious observance.”

The ancient Hebrews had many days set apart to worship, praise and thank God. Passover and Succoth are holy days of gratitude to God for His loving-kindness and deliverance from Egypt.

Early Americans often held days of thanksgiving in the various states and commonwealths. Washington and Madison each proclaimed a day of thanksgiving while president.

In October 1789, President George Washington signed a proclamation requested by Congress “to recommend to the people of the United States a Day of Public thanksgiving and Prayer, to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many and signal favors of almighty God, especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to form a government for their safety and happiness.”

Washington then assigned the twenty-sixth day of November “to be devoted by the people… to the service of that great and glorious Being who is the beneficent author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be;” and to “all unite in rendering unto Him our sincere and humble thanks for His kind care and protection of the people of this country…”

It was to remember, Washington said, God’s “manifold mercies” and providence, “for the civil and religious liberty with which we are blessed,” and, “in general, for all the great and various favors” He gave them.

In the dark days of the Civil War in 1863, Lincoln proclaimed, by Act of Congress, an annual National Day of Thanksgiving following a letter campaign promoting the idea by Sarah Hale. As a mother, widowed at the age of 34, Hale was the editor of the first woman’s magazine in America and campaigned for over 40 years to make Thanksgiving a national holiday.

Lincoln’s words are especially timely now with our soldiers fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq, “I do therefore invite my fellow citizens in every part of the United States, and also those who are at sea and those who are sojourning in foreign land, to set apart and observe the last Thursday of November…as a day of Thanksgiving and Praise to our beneficent Father who dwelleth in the Heavens.”

He recommends that we “commend to his tender care all those who have become widows, orphans, mourners or sufferers” from the war and to look at the many blessings we have been given by God including “which are so constantly enjoyed that we are prone to forget the source from which they come… Almighty God...”

“…But we have forgotten God. We have forgotten the gracious hand which preserved us in peace and multiplied and enriched and strengthened us, and we have vainly imagine, by the deceitfulness of our hearts, that all these blessing were produced by some superior wisdom and virtue of our own...”

In conclusion, Lincoln says, “It has seemed to me fit and proper that God should be solemnly, reverently and gratefully acknowledged, as with one heart and one voice, by the whole American people…”

Even amongst the pain, upheaval and difficulties of the Civil War, the nation came together for a day of thanksgiving and praise.

Sadly, someone erroneously wrote in Wikipedia, “Thanksgiving Day is … a time to give thanks for the harvest and express gratitude in general…While perhaps religious in origin, Thanksgiving is now primarily identified as a secular holiday.” Maybe this is true for some Americans, but certainly not for all. And definitely not the way the “Mother of the American Thanksgiving,” Sarah Hale visualized it.

Hale wrote, “Let this day…be the grand Thanksgiving Holiday of our nation, when the noise and tumult of worldliness may be exchanged for the laugh of happy children, the glad greeting of family reunion, and the humble gratitude of the Christian heart.”

And Edward Martin wisely reminds us, "Thanksgiving Day comes, by statute, once a year; to the honest man it comes as frequently as the heart of gratitude will allow."

Warm regards,
Floyd Brown

The idea of an eco-friendly and sustainable Thanksgiving is another liberal plot to suck the joy out of life. Read more...

Flight 93 Father Denounces Civilian Trial for 9/11 terrorists

2009-11-24T06:08:00.000-08:00

Tom Burnett Sr:

A military trial will do the same thing--give them justice, give them a chance to talk--but not out, you know, in the public.

Nicely framed and edited by KSTP Minneapolis:

Second Burnett interview here. If only our government, with all its resources, could make 1/100th the sense of this honest patriot, but honesty and patriotism seem to be completely absent from the Obama/Holder makeup. Mr. Burnett says he will fight.

Mr. Burnett is also trying to stop the Park Service from planting a giant Mecca-oriented crescent atop his son's grave

Video expose of what was originally called the Crescent of Embrace design, contains footage of Mr. Burnett and Alec Rawls (author of this blogburst post) at last year's Memorial Project meeting:

Please sign our petition and let your Representative know of your disdain for placing an homage to Islam over the memorial of the heroes that gave their life to protect us from the result of Islam. This is SICK!!!

Another "Photo-Op" For The Usurper? Maybe?

2009-11-22T06:27:00.000-08:00

A 15-year-old Egyptian girl, Dina el-Gohary, has written an emotional appeal to President Obama asking him to use his influence to save her father, Maher el-Gohary, who is being persecuted for his beliefs. ... Dina and her father are Christian converts in a part of the world where conversion can mean death. Read more...

In order to claim misguided Christian votes, Obama claimed to be a Christian during his Presidential campaign. Immediately afterward, he began making disparaging remarks regarding Christians and let it be known he stood for Socialism and genocide of infants. All this is most ungodly, but, it did not keep him from collecting vast support from those of whom profess Christianity, but, have not a clue as to what that means.

Obama's clear stand against Israel and actions taken which can only be regarded as anti Christ, would strongly indicate to a true Christian he is anything but a Christian. He claims he has never been a muslim but supports jihad propaganda all the way, and fluently quotes the Koran. In his book, "Audacity of Hope", Obama makes it very clear, "If things begin to get ugly, I will defend Islam."

So, let us see if Obama takes the politically strategic "photo-op" mentality on this plea from Dina, in regards to saving her Christian father in a muslim state. The "Peace and love" religion (claim of the apostates) is all about killing the infidel and the Jew, the two least supported people of Barack Hussein Obama.

Recognition of Usurper Fraud Rises

2009-11-18T07:11:00.000-08:00

MORE PEOPLE REALIZING "SOMETHING IS WRONG!!!"

We thought that you would enjoy this impassioned response we received to our latest post from a reader named Sandy Elders. I am sure you will share her views as this is indicative of what many of you have written in response to past postings. It is truly heartwarming that so many of you share our need to Stand Up for America and resurrect our core values and way of life. Spread the word, we need all the help you can muster in our efforts.

Scott W. Winchell
National Editor-in-Chief
Stand Up America USA

As a conservative, believer in the Constitution, outspoken Christian, and in general concern for your future, my future, and the future of our families, I write the following:

It is time to come together, united in our marching, standing, sign making, and speaking out efforts. It is time to tell our State officials that we will not accept excuses and silence from them on this issue any longer. I am SICK of watching Obama parade around the world like he is some great American leader. Barack Hussein Obama is a traitor to America. He is THE brown nosing, gutless, coward of the world.

Obama is not eligible to be in our White House. The White House belongs to the free people of the United States of America. Liberals throw the race card and personally attack those of us who stand firmly and speak out. They can not attack us any other way. They have no facts to back them up or support their claims. We are the majority. It is high time we act as the majority and in one voice, first to our State leaders, tell government that we will not be silenced for any reason on this issue.

Per the Constitution of the United States of America, Obama is not a natural born citizen. Obama’s father was never a United States citizen and Obama does or has in the past held a dual citizenship, which also makes him, by law of the Constitution of the United States of America, ineligible to be seated in the White House as the President of the United States of America. It is this that we must protest. We make enough noise with enough numbers that we will not be able to be ignored any longer. We get Obama removed from office and all law passed since he has been illegally in the White House will go out with him. Nazicare will be no more. Cap and Trade will not be an issue.

With Obama gone, we can then move on with restoring our freedoms and liberties. We must act as a united people for the cause. We must act now. We must act on faith. We must be relentless in our quest. Our freedoms, liberties, and our very lives depend on the removal of this traitor. He has to be stopped. With one voice, we can accomplish this objective either here within our own State Capitols or in combination of rallying our States to the cause then moving in on a major march in D.C. together and with the support of the numbers to get the job done.

It is my belief that there are reasons why the Bible states the time shall not be known for the rapture and other things which are coming. My belief is that when God gave us, the people he created, life, and free will, those of us who have chosen to walk with Him can make a huge difference in God’s time table as to when things come to pass. We have the freedom to choose to march, organize, and protest the tyrant in the White House. We have the freedom to change things for the better once again. Now we just have to get together on the reason, make a stand, and refuse to back down.

Points to march on:
1. Obama’s father was never a citizen of the U.S.A. and Obama is ineligible to be in the White House.
2. Obama has or does hold a dual citizenship and is ineligible to be in the White House.

Sign Ideas:
OBAMA RELEASE YOUR RECORDS!
OBAMA IS INELIGIBLE!
WE, THE PEOPLE, WANT OBAMA’S RECORDS!

You get the idea. We want to keep this simple, effective, and very loud. We want and need to be one voice. Be silent no more. In marching on all 50 State Capitols, we will not be able to be ignored. Something will have to be done, finally. If government continues to ignore the facts and the truth, I am ready and willing to withdraw myself from the union. I can not longer take the TYRANT IN CHIEF selling me out and waiting on a genocide to happen right here in America. We are at the door. Do we cross the threshold or do we stand?

I INTEND TO STAND!

God bless all those who have worked against healthcare, cap & trade, etc. I commend you all on your efforts and feel your frustration. If we get Obama out, his crapcare and taxes go with him.

I would like to hear from people in all 50 states who are willing to start promoting this locally and within their own state. You can message me on Facebook in my inbox, message me in chat, or even just send me a regular email to free_america_march@yahoo.com, my regular personal email address is sandyeld@yahoo.com but I have a spam filter on this email and it would be better to send messages to the FAM email address.

May God bless you all and have a GREAT week. We need a date and we need to plan on marching on our State Capitols soon, but it should be done in all 50 states on the same date.

Thank you and God Bless America,
Sandy Elders

Related: Trial Set For Obama Birth Certificate Dispute

Two Majors: Executive Cover Up

2009-11-16T06:47:00.000-08:00

Two Army Majors could not be anymore different from each other, but, both connected by the same Executive directive - hide the truth. One a patriot, the other as anti - American as one could be. One disgraced, the other shown every consideration and rationalization possible, but, not in the same perspective you would imagine.

Major Stefan Frederick Cook, Army Ranger, completed two tours in Iraq, and saw battle in Desert Storm. Career man, Cook was scheduled to deploy to Afghanistan as a contractor. Cook stated he looked forward to serving there. After much consideration, Major Cook was led by his conscience and sense of duty to the American Constitution in that there was great controversy whether the man he was serving under was actually eligible to be the Commander-in-Chief of the nation’s military.

All military personnel should indeed be concerned whether they are taking orders from a legitimate leader. In the event he was not found to be Constitutionally capable of holding the office, every order they carried out would be invalid and technically could make them war criminals. To date, Barack Hussein Obama has spent over $2 million for a team of lawyers to keep sealed any identifying records including birth certificate, school records, passports, College records, Bar exam, Senate files, and medical records.

Obama has made several statements in the past which collaborated with other witnesses statements indicating he was not born in this country. Regardless, both his parents were not natural born citizens of the United States. This alone would render Mr. Obama ineligible to hold the office of President under our Constitutional Law.

Major Cook did what most would not have the nerve to do - he filed a law suit asking Mr. Obama to present any physical proof that he is indeed the legitimate Commander-in-Chief. This is something which should have been taken care of before Obama even ran for the office, but, it was not. It is not just a desire of skeptical citizens, it is a legal requirement, of which many choose to ignore. Laws are in place for a reason. This law was implemented by our founding fathers who were fully aware of the consequences of a foreign interest being capable of infiltrating our Republic and forcing their agenda. The writers and signers of the Constitution were very intelligent. They were seeking protection of a free Republic for a people they would never know. A people two hundred years later that would scoff at the laws they put into place for their protection...

The response to Major Cook’s request for evidence of eligibility was the military released him almost immediately (72 hours) from his orders, rather than comply. Since he was no longer obligated, Major Cook’s case was dismissed. As I was doing related research, I came across many instances where the public feedback was insulting, at best, and in most cases down right vulgar. The common consensus was Major Cook was a coward, a sort of draft dodger, if you will, just “Trying anything to get out of combat.” Of course, the insults came from people who never served a day. The Defence Dept. also pressured Cook's boss to fire him from his civilian job, according to the CEO of the company.

It never ceases to amaze me how vulgar and immoral liberals are, for the most part. The rants all over the internet regarding Sarah Palin, Orly Taitz, and all conservatives in general, is disgusting and vile. They have no legitimate arguments for the facts, so they resort to pervasive language. There truly is a huge separation of integrity and decency between the two political halves of the United States.

Major Nidal Malik Hasan, also a career man, was a psychiatrist, recently assigned to Fort Hood, in Texas. Hasan was responsible for counseling the men and women returning from tours of duty in Iraq and Afghanistan. Hasan was also a lifelong muslim (not converted as many reports have stipulated). It was also commonly known his hatred for Americans. For almost a year, that we know for sure, he was making many anti - American and violent jihadist comments to other personnel. His commanding officers were aware of his rants, and even the FBI “had an interest” in him.

Hasan had many terrorist contacts and communiqué since 9/11, including the mosque where several of the 9/11 attackers received their counseling. The mosque and its leader is still allowed to function in our country, even after we have obtained intelligence regarding their involvement in the Islamic jihad. Hasan was also allowed to continue his service in the Army, even after is anti - American propaganda seemed to have stepped up since Obama took office. At the same time, Obama appointed Hasan to assist the transition team in the Department of Homeland Security.

On Thursday, November 5, during a reception for a group of returning soldiers from Iraq, Hasan entered the facility armed with two semi-automatic handguns and dressed in Islamic garb, yelling, “Allah Akbar.” He proceeded to open fire, killing 14 and wounding 30 of the unarmed soldiers. As none of the personnel on the base was armed, the jihadist was eventually brought down by local police officers.

The response from Mr. Obama concerning the incident was almost non existent. In a brief public appearance he made a ’by the way’ mention of the incident after several unrelated and insignificant announcements. His main concern was that nobody rush to judgment in that Hasan’s actions had anything to do with Islam. I was immediately reminded of the rush to judgment on the part of Mr. Obama in the Crowley/Gates affair, where he slandered an innocent white police officer over his black racist friend, before he knew any facts in the case. Obama never acknowledged the true racism in that situation. And he refuses to acknowledge the truth behind Major Hasan’s actions, as well.

The Senate had initiated a probe into the events leading up to the Hasan terrorist attack on our military. There was some in Congress that wanted to know how he managed to carry out such a blatant agenda. Who dropped the ball? Why was all the anti - American rhetoric from Hasan ignored? Friday, Mr. Obama instructed Congress to drop their investigation, once again attempting to keep the truth from Americans.

One must be reminded of the statement Obama made in his book “Audacity of Hope” where he makes it very clear, “When things get ugly,” he will “Defend Islam.”

After much criticism of the Bush administration for how it handled protecting Americans after 9/11, even in light of no further attacks being perpetrated, Obama knows a conceived terrorist attack while he is in office would be devastating. How would he explain his incapability of keeping us safe after all the criticism of Bush, who did keep us terrorist free for eight years?

If he acknowledged Hasan’s attack was jihad, how would Obama explain his support for Islam? Instead, the left relentlessly projects Hasan’s actions as though he was a stressed soldier who snapped, just like Janet Napolitano warned in her report released to law enforcement several months ago. The ironic issue which overwhelmingly goes unnoticed, as did Major Cook’s spotless service to his country, is that Hasan has never seen any action. Rather, Hasan has only had an office job with all the perks. It was only recently he was scheduled to be deployed to Afghanistan, where he feared he would be forced to fight other jihadists. This is where is loyalty remained.

I had a friend applied for a low security level communications job in the Navy. They sent intelligence officers out to our neighborhood to interview residents near where he grew up, to find out what kind of kid he was, whether he ever did anything mischievous. He was investigated to the hilt. If your Islamic, and a known enemy of the state, we wouldn’t want to offend, even if it costs our national security. In fact, come to think of it, Obama wouldn’t even qualify for the Navy job.

The overwhelming response from the general public??? Every empathetic (and sickening) excuse under the sun. Hasan has been made out to be a victim in most liberal media and internet forums.

Mostly, people are defending Islam as just another religion which should be respected. They say, "You cannot judge the whole religion by the actions of a few bad ones." Those who say these things, have no idea what they are talking about. They are merely repeating the ignorant rhetoric they have heard. THEY HAVE NOT READ THE KORAN!!! Or, they have read the Koran and know what is says, but, they lie for jihad, inorder to spread the false rhetoric.

The latest ridiculous statement is, "All jihadists are muslim, but, not all muslims are jihadists." This comment could not be more irrelevant to the scheme of things. It is comparing apples with oranges. Those of whom claim to be muslim, but, not jihad, are not Koran believing muslims and it is a puzzle as to why they call themselves muslim. They make up a very small percentage of the muslim population. As apostates, they will eventually have to answer to their own, as it means death.

All Koran believing muslims are Islamic jihad and follow sharia law. This accounts for all the "honor killings" which have escalated here in the U.S. as of late. Barack Obama knows all this, yet he hides it and deceives the public. He is very well versed in the Koran, and well aware of its violent agenda against Israel and America. It is the agenda of this administration to promote sharia law in the U.S. so it would not go over too well if muslims are seen in a 'bad light'.

Evangelist Pat Robinson made a public statement yesterday disclosing the truth of Islam. He expressed the hate and political agenda with religious overtones. He was slandered by every media including FOX, which has been accused of being too conservative. Maybe the meetings between Fox Execs and the White House recently made a difference? I simply report reality vs rhetoric. You decide!

The Defense Department continues to duck the hard questions about the Fort Hood massacre. As many as eight Army officers might take the fall for not reporting Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan's abnormal behavior in the years leading up to his Nov. 5 terrorist rampage. But as Bill Gertz reported yesterday on the front page of The Washington Times, fear of being perceived as insensitive played a critical role in those officers keeping Maj. Hasan in the force. There's no sign the military's politically correct climate is about to change. (Read more)

Elected and Appointed U.S. Government Officials Who Violate Their Oath of Office and the Constitution Must Resign or Be Impeached

2009-11-14T13:28:00.001-08:00

By Paul E. Vallely MG, US Army (Ret)

The Declaration of Independence states in part: “…That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to affect their Safety and Happiness...”

The arrogance of power in the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government has reached epic and intolerable proportions across the nation. The U.S. President, Vice-President, cabinet members and senior appointed officials, members of Congress, and members of the Supreme Court take the following sacred oath of office:

“I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same, that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”

Sadly, we have seen most of them violate their oath. Fraud, lying and corruption are rampant in the institutions of government and some have engaged in treasonous activities. They know who they are, as do the people.

The Articles of Confederation were replaced with the Constitution which granted the federal government enough authority to cultivate, promote and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our posterity but not enough authority to destroy it. The balance between governmental authority and individual liberty was understood and accepted. Federal power was confined to that which was specifically enumerated in the Constitution and no more.

That power was further limited as it was spread among three federal branches – the legislative, executive and judicial. Beyond that, the power remained with the States and, ultimately, the people. In 1789, Thomas Jefferson was overheard saying to James Madison, “Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers of the people alone. The people themselves therefore are its only safe depositories.”

In 1861, Abraham Lincoln’s issued this warning in his inaugural address, “Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing government and form a new one. This is a most valuable and sacred right – a right which we hope and believe is to liberate the world.”

The U.S. Constitution, Article One, Section Five, Clause II and the 10th Amendment to the Constitution provide the constitutional authority for the President, Vice-President, cabinet appointees, members of Congress and members of the Supreme Court to be removed from office for failure to properly discharge their constitutional duties and responsibilities.

The U.S. Constitution allows the citizens of their country to freely elect their government leaders. Americans elect the president and vice-president every four years, members of the House of Representatives every two years, members of the Senate every six years. Members of the Supreme Court are nominated by the president and receive lifetime appointments if confirmed by the Senate. And political appointees in the executive branch serve at the pleasure of the President if confirmed by the Senate.

“We, the People” have had enough of this current government. They, not the American People, are on a socialist and treasonous death march and bankrupting the country. We have watched the President and members of his Cabinet, Vice-President, members of Congress, and members of the Supreme Court, defile our nation’s founding documents and sacred principles – and violate their sacred oath of office.

These are extraordinary times. “We, the People” cannot necessarily wait for the next round of elections because of the urgent and deteriorating national security and economic conditions. The time has come to call on these public servants to put the interests of “We, the People” above their own self-interests by resigning from their government positions immediately. In the event no resignations and impeachment proceedings are forthcoming, the American people can assist them by voting them out of office starting in 2010.

Paul Vallely is a retired MG, US Army and is Chairman of Stand Up America USA
and Save Our Democracy

World Free of Nuclear Weapons?

2009-11-12T09:02:00.000-08:00

* in billions, 1966, Brookings Institute*

Louis Rene Beres, Thomas McInerney and Paul E. Vallely

What sort of national security policy can we expect from a president who seeks a "world free of nuclear weapons?" In principle, this is a reasonable objective. In reality, however, it is preposterous.

President Obama, by failing to identify serious strategic threats and objectives, has ignored the core expectations of national survival.

Further nuclear proliferation should be curtailed, but, ironically, this goal would actually be degraded by the president's proposals. By themselves, nuclear weapons are neither good nor evil. In certain circumstances, these weapons may even be indispensable to international stability and national security. The nuclear stalemate between this country and the former Soviet Union played a critical role in preventing World War III. And, however ambiguous, Israel's implicit nuclear deterrent is required for that country's very life.

The naive nuclear hopes of Mr. Obama represent an elaborate fiction. What we require, instead, is a model of international relations that reflects, realistically, the passions and principles of our potential enemies. Such a model would be drawn not from Mr. Obama's idealized visions, but from the informed awareness that America's multiple enemies may still remain face down to peace with the United States.

When Pericles delivered his Funeral Oration, with its praise of Athenian civilization, his perspective was inner-directed. Pericles remarked: "What I fear more than the strategies of our enemies is our own mistakes." Later, in Rome, Cicero inquired: "What can be done against force without force?" Today, a president of the United States must still understand that in a world of international anarchy, foreign policy must aim at maintaining and improving his country's power position.

America needs nuclear weapons for deterrence. We need to continually upgrade and refine these weapons, as well as their associated strategic doctrine. We need to recapitalize our national nuclear deterrent and ensure that we can maintain all essential global power projection capabilities. This means, at a minimum, a re-examination of nuclear targeting doctrine, this time with regard to current threats from other countries and their proxies. It also means preparing for a world in which both our national and subnational enemies may sometimes be irrational. In all of these matters, the president's current glide path to a nuclear-free world is counterproductive.

A key concern of U.S. strategic doctrine must still be pre-emption. Like it or not, there are major threats on the horizon that may still call for anticipatory self-defense. In our uncertain strategic future, where enemy rationality cannot always be assumed, and where the essential effectiveness of national ballistic missile defense would be problematic, the only alternative to an American pre-emption could be surrender or defeat.

Sea power still has its place. Future enemy missile launches could come from container ships off our shores. Launches against Israel could likely also come directly from Iran, so a modernized U.S. anti-missile fleet capability should be positioned in the Mediterranean, Red and Arabian seas. For Israel, its current Dolphin class submarines may have to be upgraded, and so, too, may its Arrow-centered system of ballistic missile defense.

A nuclear threat to American cities need not come from enemy missiles. It could also come from cars and trucks, and from ships used only for "dirty-bomb" dispersals. Ballistic missile defense would be of no use against any such attacks.

Could we make enemy states and their surrogates believe that proxy acts of nuclear terrorism would elicit an unacceptable retaliation against them directly? Perhaps, but functional answers can never emerge from a plan for global nuclear disarmament.

America's strategic doctrine must rest on the idea that threats of war and terrorism may now derive from a genuine "clash of civilizations." This does not mean Mr. Obama is wrong in his expanding emphasis on negotiation and diplomacy, but only that he should also acknowledge that some of our principal enemies will be unresponsive to traditional deterrent policies. These enemies, sworn to expectations of jihad, will be animated not by the ordinary secular promises of hegemony, wealth and privilege, but by power over death.

Some of these enemies could come to resemble the suicide bomber writ large. Such enemies may not concede an inch to proposals for compromise, coexistence and peaceful settlement.

An act of nuclear terrorism against the United States could have overwhelming consequences. To prevent the "Ryder truck scenario," which could involve either a radiological or authentic chain-reaction nuclear weapon, Mr. Obama's strategic policy would have to hold the state sponsors accountable. This policy should initially offer these states a suitable diplomatic option.

If any such outreach should fail, the president must then make clear that any terrorist proxy nuclear explosion in this country would certainly elicit an unacceptably damaging retaliation. This means that we should (1) unambiguously target these sponsor states; and (2) plainly and regularly "war-game" retaliatory options with national command authorities.

Nuclear weapons are not going to go away. Understanding this, Mr. Obama must quickly begin to construct a broad and coherent strategic plan from which specific policy options can be drawn. This compelling plan should prepare to deal effectively with both our national and subnational adversaries, and should take into account that some of them might sometimes be willing to act irrationally.

Louis Rene Beres is professor of political science and international law at Purdue University. Thomas McInerney is a retired Air Force lieutenant general and vice chief of staff and co-author of "The Endgame: Winning the War on Terror" (Perseus Distribution Services, 2006). Paul E. Vallely is a retired Army major general and co-author of "The Endgame." He is chairman of Stand Up America and Save Our Democracy Projects.

"Allah is great!": So Great He Would Approve Of Murder, If He Was Alive

2009-11-08T09:07:00.000-08:00

The United States is engaged in a global struggle with violent adherents to an extremist Islamic creed. It does not besmirch the Muslim faith - or the vast majority of American Muslims - to admit that fact. The politically correct tendency to define attacks as something other than terrorism simply to avoid addressing the motives of the attacker is dangerous. Anyone who shouts "Allahu Akbar" and opens fire on a crowd of unarmed people is a terrorist. If Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan is not a terrorist, no one is. Read More from James Robbins(Washington Times)

Senator Joe Lieberman stated "if" this was a terrorist attack, it will have been the worst executed on our soil since 9/11. He went on to say it certainly appears that way. Hasan had been under investigation by the FBI for six months, due to anti American, pro terrorist comments he had made on a website and to others in the military. In fact, Hasan was recommended for counseling. I had a friend who applied for communications in the Navy. Before he could be approved, intellegence officers even visited neighbors to see what kind of kid he was. How could Hasan proceed as an officer (Major)?

Obama can't be bothered by Islamic terrorism
By RALPH PETERS :

Last Updated 6:07 AM, November 8, 2009

In the wake of the terrorist strike on our soldiers at Fort Hood, one individual’s still missing in action: Our commander in chief. The massacre’s 51 casualties, including 13 dead, were insufficient to drag President Obama away from the White House Happy Hour.

We just saw the worst terror attack on America since 9/11. And Obama couldn’t adjust his schedule to support our grieving troops.

Instead, we got his subtle defense of the perp: Unwilling to use the word “terror,” let alone the phrase “Islamist terror,” Obama warned us not to “rush to judgment.”

A Muslim fanatic, known to the FBI as a fan of suicide bombers and to colleagues as an opponent of our government, coolly buys weapons, heads to a military facilityhe knows will be packed with unsuspecting soldiers, waits for the crowd to thicken, then shouts, “Allah is great!” and guns down 51 patriots, calmly reloading among the dead and dying.

But don’t rush to judgment!!!

Imagine if, instead of Fort Hood, the massacre had gone down at a mosque in Detroit — carried out by a maddened Christian or Jew. Obama would’ve been aboard Air Force One before the pilots had time to file a flight plan and he would’ve been on site before the gun smoke cleared, hugging and boo-hooing and dispensing stirring rhetoric for the evening news.

But go out of his way to rally our butchered troops? Not a chance. It’s not like they’re real human beings with Ivy League degrees. When Obama got word of the attack, he didn’t even lose his fabled cool.

Obama may be shamed into visiting Ft. Hood at some point, but his priority since Thursday has remained socializing American medicine. What happens in Texas, stays in Texas.

Move on? Yes we can!

Of course, this act of Islamist terrorism has been an inconvenience to a president whose administration insists there’s no such thing. Those dead and wounded soldiers are such an embarrassment. If only a Baptist or Lutheran had been the shooter, things would’ve been so much tidier.

What’s next? The White House is going to bring heavy pressure on the FBI, through Attorney General Eric Holder, to play down investigative results confirming that Maj. Nidal Hasan was motivated by his Muslim beliefs.

Instead, we’ll hear even more about the “harassment” Hasan suffered as the media toe the line laid down by the vile lead editorial in Saturday’s New York Times and how this calculating terrorist contracted PTSD from his patients.
Let me kill the harassment myth right now: Political correctness rules in today’s Army. We even protect our enemies these days. Had any soldier harassed Hasan because of his Islamist nuttiness, that soldier would’ve disappeared faster than a Franklin on a Times Square sidewalk.

Any snarky remarks directed toward Hasan — if there were any — would’ve come in reaction to his railing against our government, our military’s mission and the monstrous injustice that, after grabbing an education in psychiatry worth hundreds of thousands of dollars from our military, he might have had to do his duty.

Far from being harassed himself, this creep was allowed to harass the soldiers he treated for stress disorders. According to colleagues, Hasan not only argued with his patients about our wars, but preached Islam to those under his care. (Just what troubled vets needed, no doubt.)

Prejudice? You bet. In this terrorist’s favor. Nobody in Hasan’s chain of command had the sense of duty to weed this pervert out. Why? Hasan would’ve accused them of discrimination. And the officer who brought charges against Hasan would’ve been the one whose career suffered.

Since writing on this travesty in the Post and speaking out on Fox News, I’ve been deluged with supportive messages — many from soldiers outraged at the politically correct treatment of this terrorist by the media, by senior military leaders — and by the president.

How many more Americans have to die, at home and in war, before our president admits that there is, indeed, such a thing as Islamist terror? Will he ever admit that it played a role in the tragedy at Fort Hood?

Not a chance. Islam’s a religion of peace. America’s the problem. And don’t you forget it.

Rally of Patriots Against Health Care Takeover

2009-11-06T05:17:00.000-08:00

Nov 5, 2009: With just a few days notice, tens of thousands more people showed up at the nation's Capitol than did for Islam Day of Prayer, which took several months and a lot of money.

Michele Bachmann called for the event so citizens could rally and walk the halls of the Capitol building voicing their opposition to the latest health care bill, which Nancy Pelosi is rushing a vote through today, regardless of what "We The People" have to say.

Tens of thousands of people from across the country made a "House call" on the west side of the Capitol yesterday. These Americans traveled to Washington to register their objections to the mammoth government health care bill that Democrats are rushing through Congress. The size and spirit of the rally were a testament to the explosion in grass-roots activism opposed to the expansion of government under President Obama's and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's watch. The silent majority is silent no longer.

Read more of The Grassroots Keep Growing

Bloomberg is reporting that despite the voice of the citizens in repudiating ObamaCare and other Obama initiatives in Tuesday's vote, the Democratic leadership in the House is proceeding with plans for a vote on the massive 2-trillion-dollar government takeover of healthcare. The vote could come as early as today or Saturday.

Please contact Congress (via this link) and give them an alert: "Vote No on H.R. 3962(health care reform); Consider the 2010 campaign"

The following video was taken yesterday at the rally:

Veterans Day 2009

2009-11-05T08:25:00.000-08:00

God Bless Our Veterans and their Families America
By Paul Vallely MG US Army (Ret)

The 11th of November is remembered as the day when the First World War officially ended, with the signing of the Armistice by the Germans – on the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month of the year 1918; certainly a whole lot of 11s to make this significant day difficult to forget. Initially, the day was commemorated as Armistice Day, as proclaimed by the President of the United States Woodrow Wilson in 1919, a year after the historic day.

As other wars since the First World War came and went, it became apparent that there are other veterans that need to be remembered other than those who served in World War I that ended on Armistice Day. It was a shoe store owner from Emporia, Kansas, Al King, who came up with the idea to expand the reach of Armistice Day to include all American veterans, regardless of which war they fought in. President Dwight Eisenhower signed this inclusion into a law on May 26, 1954, and on November 8 that same year, Armistice Day became known as Veterans Day.

On Veterans Day weekend, one might want to commemorate the sacrifices of our beloved American our beloved “Heroes” by taking time to enrich our knowledge on the lives that they lead and the challenges that they face. We love and cherish them so for their sacrifices and their service across the globe.

I will be joining Wayne Newton and John Dawson in Phoenix to celebrate and honor our Veterans this week. My wife, Muffin and daughter, Dana and I celebrate our SON, Scott, on this day whom we lost in Special Forces in April 2004.

God be with them ALL. Rest Easy!

Paul E. Vallely

Chairman - Stand Up America US - Save Our Democracy

www.standupamericaus.com

www.soldiersmemorialfund.org

www.saveourdemocracy.org

E-Mail: standupamerica1@gmail.com

Fax: 406 837 0996

Margin Of [ERROR]: NY 23

2009-11-04T08:43:00.000-08:00

The special election for the 23rd congressional district of New York ended with conservative candidate Doug Hoffman losing to Democrat Bill Owens. Dede Scozzafava, Republican, dropped out days before the election after much heat from conservatives surfaced regarding her being a R.I.N.O.(Republican in name only). Scozzy was for everything Obama, including, but, not limited to, Union 'Card Check', which made her a favorite of SEIU and A.C.O.R.N. .

Although Scozzafava was not actually in the race, her name remained on the ballot. She received almost 7,000 worthless, wasted votes. The margin of Owens win over Hoffman was just over 4,000 votes. It is at least fair to say the majority of the voters may not be represented as a result of the "Win", if just half of those votes to Scozzy were intended for a conservative agenda.

This is why it is so very important that voters actually know what they are doing when they arrive at the polls. It is called 'responsible voting'. In much the same way, Usurper Barry Soetoro, aka, Barack Husein Obama, won due to ignorance on the part of the majority which voted for him, many of the NY 23 voters probably did not have a clue as to what had taken place earlier in the week. Chances are, as many do, Republicans showed up to vote 'Republican' and that's what they thought they were doing.

Scozzy's name should have been removed from the ballot, if for no other reason. There have been no protests of the outcome, as of yet. Many will not voice an opinion as they are afraid of being screamed at, "SORE LOSER!!!" This is the most basic technique of the sore losing liberals, of whom are ready to destroy property and kill people when they lose, but, that's another subject.

Based on the ridiculousness of Scozzy being on the ballot and the very likely margin of error which would probably have gone to the Conservative, WHY WOULD THERE NOT BE A RUN OFF ELECTION??? Would it not be worth it to know that the majority of the people are being represented? I'm just saying...

Right, Not Privilege To Bear Arms

2009-10-25T05:54:00.000-07:00

***please find petition at bottom

What part of "...shall not be infinged" do you not understand?

The great pay-back has begun, and it's going to be ugly.

The gun grabbers in Congress are paying back the anti-gun extremists who put them and Barack Obama in office.

American citizens are facing an assault on our gun rights like we’ve never seen before. You see, H.R. 45 is Barack Obama’s gun control package, and it includes the most vile anti-gun measures he’s supported over the years.

H.R. 45 establishes a NATIONAL gun registry database of every gun and its owner -- for the whole county! Your private information and every gun you own would be in the system.

But that’s only if you succeed in buying a gun in the first place!

And since H.R. 45 dramatically increases requirements for firearms purchases far beyond those ever proposed, you just might find youself incapable of buying a firearm once this bill takes effect. But, it gets worse:

*The National Association for Gun Rights has a survey ready for you to complete, but I want you to understand just how dangerous this bill is before I give you the link. Please bear with me for a moment.

You see, H.R. 45 would establish a national gun registry database which would:

Increase requirements for firearms purchases, far beyond those ever proposed.

Create a national firearms registry overseen by the Federal Government.

Invoke Draconian penalties for bookkeeping errors related to the Federal Firearms Database. It gets worse though.

Sarah Brady and her allies in Congress want to force you to take a written exam to prove that you are "fit" to exercise your Constitutionally protected right to keep and bear arms.

I'm sure I don't have to tell you that gun registration has historically laid the groundwork for total firearm confiscation. Citizen disarmament is the watchword of tyrants everywhere.

In fact, the most brutal dictators of the last century were famous for their gun registration and confiscation schemes.

But H.R. 45, Obama's National Gun Registry and Citizen Disarmament Act, is more than just a forced registration of all firearms in America.

The bill also makes it increasingly difficult to buy a gun in the first place.

Taken right out of Sarah Brady's Christmas wish list, H.R. 45 includes a laundry list of new restrictions on firearms purchases.

In addition to the outrageous national gun registration requirement, H.R. 45 also requires you to:

1. Pass a written examination to purchase a firearm.

2. Release your medical records -- including confidential mental health records -- to the government to get your "fitness" to own a firearm approved.

3. Observe a two-day waiting period before all firearms purchases.

4. Pay a gun tax of $25 or more on all firearm purchases.
Moreover, H.R. 45 bans all private firearms sales and maximizes penalties for minor clerical errors in dealing with the national gun registry.

The list goes on and on. It's enough to turn your stomach. We will even pay a fine for not immediately updating info, such as change of address. You can read the entire contents of the bill here.

I know I don't have to tell you, but these restrictions make a mockery of the Constitution. "The Right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" might as well say: "You have no rights."

* Even the Supreme Court’s recent Heller decision guaranteeing an individual’s right to own a firearm doesn’t hamper Barack Obama’s agenda one bit.

In fact, it emboldens gun grabbers to pass legislation taxing ammunition, increasing registration requirements, and drastically limiting when, how and where you can use your firearm.

We must make this gun-grab expensive and politically painful for the enemies of freedom. If we do, they'll flinch ... and LOSE.

By mobilizing hundreds of thousands of grassroots gun owners across the country, the National Association for Gun Rights can put anti-gun politicians on the hot seat.

PLEASE SIGN PETITION!!!

Obama's Agenda Predicted in 50 Year Old Cartoon

2009-10-24T07:18:00.000-07:00

It's truly amazing how many can be fooled by the rhetoric of the Leftists. So many have died over the past 233 years so we can have the right to make the wrong decisions to undo the cause for which they died.

I have had many uninformed sheeple and zombies ask me, "What is wrong with New World Order?" After lengthy discussion, it was determined, without a doubt, they will have to experience it before they will ever understand just what they gave up.

Over the past generation, we have lost the concept of "freedom" through the dedicated propaganda of the elite to abolish it. Since this country was forged there has been a tyranny in the works, whose only obstacle is the Constitution of the United States of America. The objective is to make a relative few more powerful and wealthy than anyone can comprehend. The only way they can achieve this is to make the poor think they love them. In reality, they have always looked down on the misfortuned and ethnic groups. Diversity is what they preech, murder is what they practice. Human life will not stand in their way.

Many have known for years, the objective of the New World Order is to eliminate the middle class. There will be only the filthy rich or the dirt poor and all will rely on the government for their needs. This is totally acceptable to those persons without drive to be better. It is even more acceptable to those of whom have no concern for their children's future. Our decisions today will affect generations to come... It Cannot Be Undone!!!

As you fall in love with the phony elixir, the snake oil "Which will cure all", you must admit to yourself you only have concern for what you can get. You must be honest as you give away your rights (which you rationalize) and admit you have no respect for your armed forces and the casualties suffered. The millions of whom gave their lives over the years so you could extend your hand out screaming for freebies, is just a joke to you. Whatever you do, do not have the audacity to call yourself a patriot, as do many of you.

Barack Obama's camp was outraged when someone questioned his patriotism during the campaign, based on his communist connections. All the threatening information was available then, just as it is now. I see so many, everyday, posting things and commenting like it is news, when it was all readily available a year ago. But, praise the Lord, you got a black man elected, which was more important than any communist connections, or proof of his anti-American ideology. There are so many black men, and even a few black women, would be so much more beneficial, and a lot more experienced. But, Obama was (appointed) for his elite agenda.

If you voted for Obama, and you have finally come to your senses, or man enough to admit you made a tragic mistake, you can redeem yourself by 1) educating others, or 2) tearing up your voter registration card if you do not intend to take serious your responsibility as an American voter. Haphazardly voting for someone because of how they look or their ability to swoon you is nothing of which to be proud.

Bold speech?...You betcha!!!

"Lets Rock & Roll": Flight 93 crescent now points less than 3° from Mecca

2009-10-22T07:40:00.000-07:00

The heroes aboard Flight 93 said "Let's roll", as they proceeded to sacrifice their lives to stop a group of jihadists from flying the jumbo-jet into the nation's Capitol. Now, progress is being made to turn their memorial, at the crash site, into an homage for Islam. An honor for the killers.

The original Crescent of Embrace memorial to Flight 93 faced less than 2° from Mecca. That made it a mihrab, the Mecca-direction indicator around which every mosque is built. (Some mihrabs are pointed-arch shaped, but the classic mihrab is crescent shaped.)

The Park Service dismissed concern about the Mecca-oriented crescent on grounds that the construction drawings had not yet been finalized. “Those trees could move fifty feet, or three hundred feet,” said Project Manager Jeff Reinbold in the Spring of 2006, as if this kind of "tweaking" would make any difference (Crescent of Betrayal Ch.8 p.145-6).

The construction drawings have now been released, and yes, they moved the lower tip of the half-mile wide crescent about 300 feet, enough to change the orientation of the crescent by about 4.5°. Instead of pointing less than 2° north of Mecca, the giant Islamic-shaped crescent now points less than 3° south of Mecca.

Here is the original Crescent of Embrace:

"Qibla" is the direction to Mecca, which you can verify using any online Mecca-direction calculator (just type in Somerset PA). A person standing between the tips of the giant crescent and facing into the center of the crescent (red arrow) would be facing 1.8° north of Mecca, ± 0.1°.

Here is one of the new construction drawings:

Instead of facing a titch north of Mecca, the giant crescent now faces a titch south of Mecca (2.7° south ± 0.1°).

As with the original Crescent design, the upper crescent tip is the end of the 50’ tall Entry Portal Wall and the lower crescent tip is the last of the 50’ tall Maple trees on the bottom. The landscape overlays make the details hard to see in the thumbnail image above, but at full resolution they are fully legible. (Copy of source PDF, without the superimposed orientations lines here. Large file warning. Graphic is on p. 30 of 233.)

The Park Service was SUPPOSED to remove the Islamic symbol shapes

When architect Paul Murdoch’s winning Crescent of Embrace design was announced in September 2005, it appeared to show a bare naked Islamic crescent and star-flag planted atop the crash site:

Burned by the resulting firestorm of protest, the Park Service to agreed to get rid of the Islamic symbol shapes, but they never did. They added an extra arc of trees, and they call it a broken circle now, but the unbroken part of the circle, what symbolically remains standing in the wake of 9/11, is still a giant Islamic shaped crescent.

This is explained on the Park Service's own website. The extra arc of trees is explicitly described as a broken off part of the circle:

In summary, the memorial is shaped in a circular fashion, and the circle is symbolically "broken" or missing trees in two places, depicting the flight path of the plane, and the crash site.

Those two breaks are the two ends of the extra arc of trees:

The extra arc of trees extends from blue circle to blue circle, marking the two “breaks” in the circle referred to in the Park Service’s official explanation of the broken-circle design. One is where the flight path breaks the circle (left), the other is near the crash site (center).

What is symbolically left standing (the unbroken part of the circle) is just this:

Remove the symbolically broken off parts, and you get the original Crescent of Embrace design.

The only change is that the crescent has now been rotated clockwise a few degrees. In the construction plans it faces slightly south of Mecca instead of slightly north of Mecca. For a parallel, imagine airline security discovering a terror bomber, then playing with the fit his suicide vest before escorting him to his plane.

They said they were going to remove the giant crescent. They claim they HAVE removed it, but they haven't. Symbolically, the design remains completely unchanged. The terrorists are still depicted as smashing our peaceful circle and turning it into a giant Islamic-shaped crescent, still pointing to Mecca.

The giant crescent is actually a mihrab

Here is the mihrab at the Great Mosque in Cordoba Spain. Face into the crescent to face Mecca, just like the crescent memorial to Flight 93:

Confronted with evidence that the Crescent of Embrace is actually designed to be the world's largest mosque, the Park Service sought advice from a pair of Muslim scholars. Both acknowledged the almost exact Mecca-orientation of the giant crescent and both offered overtly dishonest excuses for it. One said not to worry about the likeness to an Islamic mihrab because no one has ever seen a mihrab this BIG before:

...most mihrabs are small, rarely larger than the figure of a man, although some of the more ornamental ones can be larger, but nothing as large at the crescent found in the site design. It is unlikely that most Muslims would walk into the area of the circle/crescent and see a mihrab because it is well beyond their limit of experience.

Right. That's why everybody scratches their head at Mt. Rushmore. No one has ever seen Abraham Lincoln so BIG before. They just can't figure it out.

To be fooled by this excuse, you have to really really want to be fooled. The other Muslim scholar said not to worry, the crescent cannot be seen as mihrab unless it points exactly at the Kaaba:

Mihrab orientation is either correct or not. It cannot be off by some degrees.

In fact, a mihrab does NOT have to point exactly at Mecca, for the simple reason that, throughout most of Islamic history, Muslims in far-flung parts of the world had no accurate way to determine the direction to Mecca. As a result, it was established as a matter of religious principle that what matters is intent to face Mecca. This was recently affirmed by Saudi religious authorities, after Meccans realized that even most of their local mosques do not face directly towards the Kaaba. “It does not affect the prayers” assured the Islamic Affairs Ministry.

Faced with evidence of an Islamic plot, why would the Park Service send this evidence exclusively to Muslims for appraisal? Have they forgotten who attacked us on 9/11?

The Service has long since been apprised of the patent dishonesties retailed by its two Muslim advisors but they don't care. They wanted to be lied to, they knew where to go to be lied to, and they got what they wanted.

Michelle Malkin and Ed Morrissey

So where are the patriotic stalwarts like Michelle Malkin whose objections were instrumental in getting the Park Service to agree to remove the Islamic symbol shapes in the first place? If they knew in 2005 that the symbolic outcome of 9/11 should not be a giant Islamic shaped crescent why are they silent about this exact same symbolism today, after THEY were promised that this perversion would be removed?

Ed Morrissey urged his readers "to tell the National Parks Service and the Secretary of the Interior to rethink their plans," promising for his own part that "as long as that crescent remains in the design, I’m not donating a red cent to the memorial." Well Ed, the crescent does remain in the design, so please rejoin the fight.

The desertion of Malkin et. al. makes a difficult gap to fill, but we had better fill it, or the Flight 93 crash-site will soon be home to the world’s largest mosque.

Ethics or Intimidation: Birther Judge Carter Stands To Be Recused

2009-10-21T09:58:00.000-07:00

David O. Carter (born 1944 in Providence, Rhode Island) is a United States District Court Judge for the Central District of California. Assumed office October 22, 1998, Nominated by Bill Clinton. Carter is hearing the case Barnett vs Obama, questioning the legitimacy of the President's office.

On October 1, just four days before the Motion To Dismiss hearing, Carter hired Siddharth Velamoor to serve as one of his two official clerks, from Oct. 1, 2009, till Sept. 30, 2010. Velamoor is a lawyer who works for a law firm where Robert F. Bauer, one of Obama’s top lawyers is a partner. Bauer’s wife is none other than Anita Dunn, the White House Communication’s Director.

The unethical placement of Velamoor on Judge Carter's staff means the case is extremely flexible, and a waste of time. It does not matter either way the case would go, the whole case is invalid. If the case goes against the plaintiff, Orly Taitz will file motion for Judge Carter's recusal. If it is in favor of the plaintiff, the Judge will have himself recused.

Was this a conspiracy (theory?) right out of the Clinton style politics? Obama/Chicago style strategy? Or, is this how Judge Carter saves face by agreeing to hear the case, but, the outcome is worthless? I guess we'll have to wait for the movie. I'm sure it will baffle even the most dedicated John Grisham fan.

Carter is a former Marine and Viet Nam vet. Carter began his legal career as an Assistant District Attorney with the Orange County District Attorney's Office in 1972 where he became the senior deputy district attorney in charge of the office's homicide division. Carter was the initial prosecutor and filed charges in the case of serial killer William Bonin, also known as "The Freeway Killer," who became the first person executed by lethal injection in California in 1996.

In addition to his judicial functions, Carter now performs a wide array of speaking engagements. He has lectured fellow judges through the California Judges College, the Judicial Criminal Law Institute, and the Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference. He also speaks frequently with judges abroad, including past engagements in Brazil, Bosnia, China, The Philippines, and Malawi. Carter finally teaches an undergraduate course on the international narcotics trade at the University of California, Irvine, where he has three times received the school's Distinguished Professors Award, and has taught with the Whittier Law School's Summer Abroad Program.

In 1981, Carter joined the bench as a Municipal Court Judge in Orange County, California. One year later, he became an Orange County Superior Judge, a position that he held until joining the federal judiciary in 1998. Carter initiated a variety of programs to assist in the rehabilitation of convicted felons, including a tattoo removal program for gang members, and was active in planning the county's Law Day festivities. He earned the nickname "King David" from attorneys while serving as the Supervising Judge of the court's Criminal Division.

Carter was nominated by President Bill Clinton on June 25, 1998 to fill a seat vacated by William J. Rea. Carter was confirmed by the United States Senate on October 21, 1998, and received his commission the following day. He now sits in the Southern Division of the Central District of California in Orange County, California.

As a jurist, Carter is known for his acute intellect, courteous judicial demeanor, tireless work ethic, and expertise in complex criminal litigation. Although he is assigned to the Central District of California, Carter also regularly sits by designation in the District of Idaho and on occasion with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and in the District of Guam.

Propaganda Media

2009-10-20T04:24:00.000-07:00

White House Communications Director Anita Dunn told a group of high school students last June that former Chinese communist dictator Mao Zedong was one of her two favorite political philosophers, and you could tell she was speaking from the heart. Her earnest appeal to the teenagers to fight their own wars, as Mao had counseled when challenged within his own party, was clearly meant as a call to activism. "You fight your war and I'll fight mine," she quoted Mao as saying, because apparently Mao was all about personal choice.

Of course, Mao's usual response to those who questioned his authority was to have them killed, but mentioning that inconvenient truth might detract from Miss Dunn anointing him a philosopher.

"What would Mao do?" seems to be the guiding question in White House communications strategy. Miss Dunn bragged that during the 2008 presidential campaign, "very rarely did we communicate through the press anything that we didn't absolutely control." The Obama White House continues this drive for control using the tools of government, seeking to harness all means of communication and organize a Cultural Revolution Lite. Read More on Dunn

The Washington Times and a select few others are the exception to the absurdly communist promoting newspapers around the country. The worse of the Marxist propaganda tabloids, I've noticed in recent years, is in St. Petersburg, Florida, of all places. The ridiculous irony is most of the (newspapers) ran off their readers by insulting the intelligence of those of whom were educated enough to read the papers, and could afford them. Now, our tax dollars will support them so they can continue the controlled propaganda for the Oligarchy.

The Obama administration and its Czars want the public to only hear the rhetoric, such as the School Czar's claim, "heterosexuality is out-dated." They do not want you to hear or see the outrage of decent Americans. If all you hear is what the leftists want you to hear, with no opposition, it becomes the norm...the accepted "politically correct" way...the "law of the land".

The Hollywood freaks are on the Socialist wagon with all the rhetoric and propaganda of how you should live to improve "Our way of life" while they are excluded from any accompanying hardships. The bold visits to Hugo Chavez by Sean Penn and Kevin Spacey was ever so telling. And sycophantic Ashton Kutcher is in the forefront lately with his star studded "Pledge to Obama" sick video, and speeches to promote "volunteering" and service to the government.

Film makers have always injected liberal propaganda into their films, aside from the amoral material throughout. Some dedicate their career to such leftist propaganda. At one time, it was funny and abstract, but, not being conceived as a threat to society, went unchallenged as our attention was diminished. We made no abstracting views, and the propaganda spread, opening doors into schools and churches. In fact, rhetoric has become so meaningful in today's society, Michael Moore's latest film attacking capitalism and promoting socialism has been deemed by many as a religious film. Michael Moore, himself, appearing on talk shows spewing scriptures, implies he is doing the godly thing, with no retort from clergy.

There is nothing more ungodly than Socialism, and Moore must be one of those Oprah "Christians"... who don't have to believe in Christ or the bible to call themselves "Christians".

Much is said with no retort, no challenge, no common sense. Opposing views are not displayed, but, only the political agenda of the (Journalist?), Hollywood star (always genius), and the anchor man which calls himself a journalist, but, constantly projects his opinion, or the agenda of the network. CNN is on a constant attack of FOX cable news channel. Cnn's so called anchors and reporters are nothing but 'sales people' posing as newsmen. However, the opinion shows on FOX seem to be filled with more facts than opinion. Facts you will not hear from CNN, MSNBC, CBS, NBC, or ABC. So, the Obama administration, teamed up with their Socialist media partners, in order to kill the facts and discredit the source, has openly waged an all out war against the ONLY news channel (FOX) which challenges the deception and propaganda from the Oligarchy.

As of late, it has apparently backfired, as ratings have gone up 20% for FOX, while CNN is hurting. Channels such as CNN are trying to create controversy and 'shock' issues in an attempt to draw viewers, but, this also is backfiring, as people are seemingly becoming more aware. Recently, when Rush Limbaugh expressed his desire to bid on the St. Louis Rams football team, an explosion of leftist media attacks pursued against the talk show host. Rush was labeled racist and several 'invented' quotes, supposedly made by him were broadcast on every liberal media. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX) gave a speech in Congress condemning Rush's bid to the NFL. The NFL, wanting to uphold their pure, clean image (rolling eyes) denied Rush's bid.

To date, the only known retraction of all the outright lies which came out regarding Rush is that of CNN's, due only to outrage by the public.

The Communication Czar in charge of the FCC, but, accountable only to Obama, stated publicly he praises the revolution of Chavez in Venezuela, and the take over of the media. "This must be done", said Mark Lloyd, commenting on controlling what comes out of the media. The plan of the administration is to burden those channels which broadcast conservative talk shows with a 100% tax. Of course, this would run anyone out of business, or force them to comply.

Ron Bloom, Obama's manufacturing Czar, also believes in Mao Tse-Tung, and like all the other Czars and cabinet members under Obama, is anti-capitalism.

I'm sure the only reason our "Transparent" administration has not hired someone to monitor CNN for any "misinformation", the same way Anita Dunn monitors FOX, is because they don't yet have the funds. May I suggest, Mr Obama, you and Congress suspend all the frivolous and unnecessary trips costing millions of tax dollars? This alone would free up a ton of money, which itself is a mystery where it is coming from. Then you could hire a person for each network to monitor their broadcast... for the good of all the people. Right?!!

Obama Preparing To Sign Global Government Pact Treaty

2009-10-16T08:07:00.000-07:00

The Minnesota Free Market Institute hosted an event at Bethel University in St. Paul on Wednesday evening. Keynote speaker Lord Christopher Monckton, former science adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, gave a scathing and lengthy presentation, complete with detailed charts, graphs, facts, and figures which culminated in the utter decimation of both the pop culture concept of global warming and the credible threat of any significant anthropomorphic climate change.

A detailed summary of Monckton’s presentation will be available here once compiled. However, a segment of his remarks justify immediate publication. If credible, the concern Monckton speaks to may well prove the single most important issue facing the American nation, bigger than health care, bigger than cap and trade, and worth every citizen’s focused attention.

Here were Monckton’s closing remarks, as dictated from an audio recording:

At [the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in] Copenhagen, this December, weeks away, a treaty will be signed. Your president will sign it. Most of the third world countries will sign it, because they think they’re going to get money out of it. Most of the left-wing regime from the European Union will rubber stamp it. Virtually nobody won’t sign it.

I read that treaty. And what it says is this, that a world government is going to be created. The word “government” actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity. The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to third world countries, in satisfication of what is called, coyly, “climate debt” – because we’ve been burning CO2 and they haven’t. We’ve been screwing up the climate and they haven’t. And the third purpose of this new entity, this government, is enforcement.

How many of you think that the word “election” or “democracy” or “vote” or “ballot” occurs anywhere in the 200 pages of that treaty? Quite right, it doesn’t appear once. So, at last, the communists who piled out of the Berlin Wall and into the environmental movement, who took over Greenpeace so that my friends who funded it left within a year, because [the communists] captured it – Now the apotheosis as at hand. They are about to impose a communist world government on the world. You have a president who has very strong sympathies with that point of view. He’s going to sign it. He’ll sign anything. He’s a Nobel Peace Prize [winner]; of course he’ll sign it.

[laughter]

And the trouble is this; if that treaty is signed, if your Constitution says that it takes precedence over your Constitution (sic), and you can’t resign from that treaty unless you get agreement from all the other state parties – And because you’ll be the biggest paying country, they’re not going to let you out of it.

So, thank you, America. You were the beacon of freedom to the world. It is a privilege merely to stand on this soil of freedom while it is still free. But, in the next few weeks, unless you stop it, your president will sign your freedom, your democracy, and your humanity away forever. And neither you nor any subsequent government you may elect will have any power whatsoever to take it back. That is how serious it is. I’ve read the treaty. I’ve seen this stuff about [world] government and climate debt and enforcement. They are going to do this to you whether you like it or not.

But I think it is here, here in your great nation, which I so love and I so admire – it is here that perhaps, at this eleventh hour, at the fifty-ninth minute and fifty-ninth second, you will rise up and you will stop your president from signing that dreadful treaty, that purposeless treaty. For there is no problem with climate and, even if there were, an economic treaty does nothing to [help] it.

So I end by saying to you the words that Winston Churchill addressed to your president in the darkest hour before the dawn of freedom in the Second World War. He quoted from your great poet Longfellow:

Sail on, O Ship of State!

Sail on, O Union, strong and great!

Humanity with all its fears,

With all the hopes of future years,

Is hanging breathless on thy fate!

Lord Monckton received a standing ovation and took a series of questions from members of the audience. Among those questions were these relevent to the forthcoming Copenhagen treaty:

Question: The current administration and the Democratic majority in Congress has shown little regard for the will of the people. They’re trying to pass a serious government agenda, and serious taxation and burdens on future generations. And there seems to be little to stop them. How do you propose we stop Obama from doing this, because I see no way to stop him from signing anything in Copenhagen. I believe that’s his agenda and he’ll do it.

I don’t minimize the difficulty. But on this subject – I don’t really do politics, because it’s not right. In the end, your politics is for you. The correct procedure is for you to get onto your representatives, both in the US Senate where the bill has yet to go through (you can try and stop that) and in [the House], and get them to demand their right of audience (which they all have) with the president and tell him about this treaty. There are many very powerful people in this room, wealthy people, influential people. Get onto the media, tell them about this treaty. If they go to www.wattsupwiththat.com, they will find (if they look carefully enough) a copy of that treaty, because I arranged for it to be posted there not so long ago. Let them read it, and let the press tell the people that their democracy is about to be taken away for no good purpose, at least [with] no scientific basis [in reference to climate change]. Tell the press to say this. Tell the press to say that, even if there is a problem [with climate change], you don’t want your democracy taken away. It really is as simple as that.

Question: Is it really irrevocable if that treaty is signed? Suppose it’s signed by someone who does not have the authority, as I – I have some, a high degree of skepticism that we do have a valid president there because I -

I know at least one judge who shares your opinion, sir, yes.

I don’t believe it until I see it. … Would [Obama's potential illegitimacy as president] give us a reasonable cause to nullify whatever treaty that he does sign as president?

I would be very careful not to rely on things like that. Although there is a certain amount of doubt whether or not he was born in Hawaii, my fear is it would be very difficult to prove he wasn’t born in Hawaii and therefore we might not be able to get anywhere with that. Besides, once he’s signed that treaty, whether or not he signed it validly, once he’s signed it and ratified it – your Senate ratifies it – you’re bound by it. But I will say one thing; they know, in the White House, that they won’t be able to get the 67 votes in the Senate, the two-thirds majority that your Constitution has stipulated must be achieved in order to ratify a treaty of this kind. However, what they’ve worked out is this – and they actually let it slip during the election campaign, which is how I know about it. They plan to enact that Copenhagen treaty into legislation by a simple majority of both houses. That they can do. But the virtue of that – and here you have a point – is that is, thank God, reversible. So I want you to pray tonight, and pray hard for your Senate that they utterly refuse to ratify the [new] Treaty of Copenhagen, because if they refuse to ratify it and [Obama] has to push it through as domestic legislation, you can repeal it.

Regardless of whether global warming is taking place or caused to any degree by human activity, we do not want a global government empowered to tax Americans without elected representation or anything analogous to constitutional protections. The Founding Fathers would roll over in their graves if they knew their progeny allowed a foreign power such authority, effectively undoing their every effort in an act of Anti-American Revolution. If that is our imminent course, we need to put all else on hold and focus on stopping it. If American sovereignty is ceded, all other debate is irrelevant.

***Skimming through the treaty, I came across verification of Monckton’s assessment of the new entity’s purpose:

38. The scheme for the new institutional arrangement under the Convention will be based on three basic pillars: government; facilitative mechanism; and financial mechanism, and the basic organization of which will include the following:

World Government (heading added)

(a) The government will be ruled by the COP with the support of a new subsidiary body on adaptation, and of an Executive Board responsible for the management of the new funds and the related facilitative processes and bodies. The current Convention secretariat will operate as such, as appropriate.

To Redistribute Wealth (heading added)

b) The Convention’s financial mechanism will include a multilateral climate change fund including five windows: (a) an Adaptation window, (b) a Compensation window, to address loss and damage from climate change impacts [read: the "climate debt" Monckton refers to], including insurance, rehabilitation and compensatory components, © a Technology window; (d) a Mitigation window; and (e) a REDD window, to support a multi-phases process for positive forest incentives relating to REDD actions.

With Enforcement Authority (heading added)

© The Convention’s facilitative mechanism will include: (a) work programmes for adaptation and mitigation; (b) a long-term REDD process; © a short-term technology action plan; (d) an expert group on adaptation established by the subsidiary body on adaptation, and expert groups on mitigation, technologies and on monitoring, reporting and verification; and (e) an international registry for the monitoring, reporting and verification of compliance of emission reduction commitments, and the transfer of technical and financial resources from developed countries to developing countries. The secretariat will provide technical and administrative support, including a new centre for information exchange [read; enforcement].

Throwing Out The Baby...: Russian Arms Deal

2009-10-14T12:17:00.000-07:00

Now that all the apologies have been made, Obama(community organizer) sends Hillary(former housewife) to Russia to present them with a non-bilateral and unconditional offer for them to inspect all our nuclear facilities. How far does this lunacy go before we start caring about the children? What in hell are we leaving them?

Russia and the United States have tentatively agreed to a weapons inspection program that would allow Russians to visit nuclear sites in America to count missiles and warheads. The plan would constitute the most intrusive weapons inspection program the U.S. has ever accepted.

Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, who met with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, said publicly Tuesday that the two nations have made "considerable" progress toward reaching agreement on a new strategic arms treaty. I'll bet it's considerable...we give them all they've ever wanted and they give nothing. Not even cooperation with Iran which Obama has been sniffling to them about.

How far can we let this community organizer fool go? This is not bilateral. We tell Russia all our coordinates so their first strike eliminates our second strike. How far does this lunacy go before we save our children? This is the most radical statements I've made to date, as this is the most radical thing Obama has done to date, believe it or not.

Even though the revolution had already begun, 9 months ago we were still considered the "Super Power"... You do understand don't you? We are now considered by all our enemies to be a joke, and they are working on finally eliminating their thorn.

Do you think the lies and deception stops with health care? Wait until the rude awakening we face in foreign affairs, from the community organizer with ON-THE-JOB-TRAINING!!! Do you remember Carter? The nightmare had just begun there...just wait!

By the time the majority of America wakes up and a new Congress can entertain Treason charges, the damage will be irreversible.

Response To Military Paid More Than They Deserve

2009-10-11T06:49:00.000-07:00

This Cindy Williams is NOT the "Laverne & Shirley" Cindy Williams. She is a Assistant Director for national Security in the Congressional Budget Office.....

Military Pay

This is an Airman's response to Cindy Williams' editorial piece in the Washington Times about MILITARY PAY, it should be printed in all newspapers across America

Ms. Cindy Williams wrote a piece for the Washington Times, denouncing the pay raise(s) coming service member's way this year citing that the stated 13% wage increase was more than they deserve. I am very curious to know what Miss Williams feels about Congress approving over 20% increase in their pay(along with outlandish fringe benefits), and aside from corruption which is ruining our country, refuse to do the job they were assigned.

A young airman from Hill AFB (pictured above) responds to her article below. He ought to get a bonus for this.

"Ms Williams: I just had the pleasure of reading your column, "Our GIs earn enough" and I am a bit confused. Frankly, I'm wondering where this vaunted overpayment is going, because as far as I can tell, it disappears every month between DFAS (The Defense Finance and Accounting Service) and my bank account. Checking my latest earnings statement I see that I make $1,117.80 before taxes per month. After taxes, I take home $874.20. When I run that through the calculator, I come up with an annual salary of $13,413.60 before taxes, and $10,490.40, after.

I work in the Air Force Network Control Center where I am part of the team responsible for a 5,000 host computer network I am involved with infrastructure segments, specifically with Cisco Systems equipment. A quick check under jobs For Network Technicians in the Washington , D.C. Area reveals a position in my career field, requiring three years experience with my job. Amazingly, this job does NOT pay $13,413.60 a year. No, this job is being offered at $70,000 to $80,000 per annum........... I'm sure you can draw the obvious conclusions.

Given the tenor of your column, I would assume that you NEVER had the pleasure of serving your country in her armed forces. Before you take it upon yourself to once more castigate congressional and DOD leadership for attempting to get the families in the military's lowest pay brackets off of WIC and food stamps, I suggest that you join a group of deploying soldiers headed for AFGHANISTAN ; I leave the choice of service branch up to you. Whatever choice you make, though, opt for the SIX month rotation: it will guarantee you the longest possible time away from your family and friends, thus giving you full "deployment experience."

As your group prepares to board the plane, make sure to note the spouses and children who are saying good-bye to their loved ones. Also take care to note that several families are still unsure of how they'll be able to make ends meet while the primary breadwinner is gone obviously they've been squandering the "vast" piles of cash the government has been giving them.

Try to deploy over a major holiday; Christmas and Thanksgiving are perennial favorites. And when you're actually over there, sitting in a foxhole, shivering against the cold desert night; and the flight sergeant tells you that there aren't enough people on shift to relieve you for chow, remember this: trade whatever MRE (meal-ready- to-eat) you manage to get for the tuna noodle casserole or cheese tortellini, and add Tabasco to everything. This gives some flavor.

Talk to your loved ones as often as you are permitted; it won't nearly be long enough or often enough, but take what you can get and be thankful for it. You may have picked up on the fact that I disagree with most of the points you present in your op-ed piece.

But, tomorrow from KABUL , I will defend to the death your right to say it.

You see, I am an American fighting man, a guarantor of your First Amendment rights and every other right you cherish. On a daily basis, my brother and sister soldiers worldwide ensure that you and people like you can thumb your collective nose at us, all on a salary that is nothing short of pitiful and under conditions that would make most people cringe. We hemorrhage our best and brightest into the private sector because we can't offer the stability and pay of civilian companies.

And you, Ms. Williams, have the gall to say that we make more than we deserve? You can kiss my royal red a**!!!

A1C Michael Bragg Hill AFB AFNCC

We salute all our armed forces for your dedicated service, and want you to know that Miss William's opinion is not indicative of most of America. I wonder, Ms Williams, if you will also be at the airport with a sign protesting our servicemen upon their return.

Support Our Troops on facebook

Support The Troops website

Obama Wins Nobel Prize For...?

2009-10-09T10:24:00.000-07:00

Every year the prestige of the Nobel Peace Prize diminishes. Eventually(which should be the case now) notification of recipients will be on an obscured portion of the newspaper.

Well, isn't it a good thing they gave him the Nobel Prize BEFORE he's indicted for TREASON???

The main question one has to ask...What on earth was he awarded for? He has undeniably accomplished nothing in his first year of his administration, even though he has a Democrat controlled Congress. He is too radical even for many of those on the left.

The Prestige of the Nobel Prize is rounded off now with Barack's name added to the likes of Yasir Arafat and Al Gore. There's something to be proud of, even if you haven't really accomplished anything to actually be awarded a prize, unless it is the Junior Commies Club 'man of the year'.

Al won for spreading GREEN(backs in his pocket); Yasir won for spreading Piece(s of humans by strapping bombs to kids backs); and now Barack has won for spreading the wealth of Americans(even though it is anti-American)... All agendas of United Nations. Spreading is more important than Uniting, to the U.N. (NWO)

Obama supports tyrants all over the globe. His policies are in line with their agendas, especially in the Middle East. He supports dictators right here in our own hemisphere, including Zelaya of Honduras, who was legally removed from power by the Honduran Congress, in order to avert a coup attempted by Zelaya. Obama still calls the Honduran action a coup, and has placed sanctions against the country.

While Senator, Obama used U.S. tax dollars to help Raila Odinga (his paternal cousin, responsible for ethnic genocide) become President of Kenya.

Coincidence? Previous to now Jimmy Carter was regarded as the worse President this nation has seen. After it's all said and done, Obama will not only be regarded the same, but, will hold the record for number of indictments of an American President; both win the non prestigious Nobel Prize.

Perhaps, if they took off the PEACE part of the title of the prize. It is indicative of the (lack) of integrity in journalism. The whole deception issue. Perception is everything, and when the majority of the people are uninformed and unaware...well, let's just say the U.N.'s agenda is on a roll like a greased wheel, with Obama at the helm.

It has been very obvious for a decade or better that the Nobel Peace Prize took a parallel view to the U.N., but, somehow, A.C.O.R.N. is connected to this...I just know it!!!

Supreme Court/Mojave Cross update

2009-10-08T09:56:00.000-07:00

The Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States have heard oral arguments in the Salazar v. Buono case, a lawsuit in which the display of a Mojave Desert cross to honor war veterans is being challenged.

The plaintiffs claim that the cross is offensive, and because of that ''offense'' they're entitled to sue in court. The ACLJ fundamentally disagrees. To create a constitutional crisis out of an eight-foot cross honoring veterans is wrong.

Take just two minutes to view a special video update from the Supreme Court steps!

The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) filed a critical brief with the Court, representing 15 Members of Congress and tens of thousands of our members from across the country.

There is no question - religious symbols are constitutional. In fact, the Supreme Court Justices ruled unanimously earlier this year in a similar case regarding display of the Ten Commandments.

View the brief video report now!

We are expecting a decision in early Spring, and because of the support of members all over America, we can also expect a victory!

Thanks for staying informed and involved. Visit us online at www.aclj.org and be sure to tune in to Jay Sekulow Live! for further updates on this and other key issues and cases.

Unconventional Warfare Now

2009-10-06T07:13:00.000-07:00

Unconventional Operations to the Rescue
(Part One of the Lily Pad Strategy)

by Paul E. Vallely, U.S Army, MG (ret)

Most Americans desire an effective change in the US war strategy and the wider global war against Islamic extremists and nations supporting them. President Obama, Secretary, Robert Gates and the Generals and Admirals must deliver it by placing experienced unconventional warfare leaders in charge of the war effort.

Since forcibly removing Al Qaeda and the Taliban in just 34 days in the Fall of 2001 with 100 Special Op Forces and Air Power and Saddam Hussein removed from power in 2003, the U.S.-led coalition Forces has been unable to achieve a take home Victory.

While many Americans recognize the conflict in Afghanistan is not going well and changes need to be made, there is substantial disagreement at the national level on a military strategy. The U.S. is seriously considering adding more conventional forces. Sending an additional 40,000 U.S. troops to Afghanistan under current military strategies will be unlikely to make much difference. Excessive and restrictive rules of engagement must be lifted and rules for engagement built into the local Commander’s Operational plan to allow maximum power to be brought to the battle. As well, “Boots on the ground in Afghanistan” really mean Afghan boots on the ground.

Unlike US/NATO troops, the adversaries in this war do not carry arms openly, wear uniforms or insignias, and abide by other laws and customs of wars specified in Geneva conventional and protocols. They instill fear in military opponents, village leaders and local populations through use of suicide bombings, improvised explosive devices, kidnappings and beheadings. And they disguise themselves as civilians and hide among civilian populations with weapons stored and discharged from mosques, schools, hospitals, market-places, private residences and public roads.

To prevail, the U.S. has to transition from a conventional to an unconventional war footing and make the enemy pay a heavy price for their despicable tactics. The US must use “proxy forces”. "If you support me, I will destroy the Taliban and al Qaeda," Gen. Abdul Rashid Dostum told The Washington Times in an interview at his northern stronghold. "I don't want to be a minister, not even the defense minister. I need to be with my soldiers. Give me the task and I will do it." Other ethnic leaders have made similar offers, but their support is problematic. Gen. Dostum is one of Afghanistan's most notorious warlords -- a Russian-educated former defense minister who turned against the Soviet Union in the 1980s but became a key figure in the Russian-backed fight against the Taliban a decade later. The tribal leaders with support are the only ones that can turn the tide of the war and not the central government in Kabul. As well, there can be no sanctuaries in Pakistan for the Taliban and Al Qaeda.

In Iraq and elsewhere, traditional troops, weapons and tactics are less useful than tools of influence, covert operations, and intelligence brought to the battlefield by special operators working harmoniously with indigenous forces and local populations. The prime objective is to create a climate of fear within enemy ranks that breaks their will to continue the armed insurrection.

Joint special operators (from all military branches) are also trained in local cultures and languages making it easier for them to embed in local populations and Afghan security forces and collect information which in turn may be used to “hunt and kill” hostile forces.

Forget about Nation Building until the enemy is defeated.

The action continues to meet resistance throughout DOD’s conventional warfare ranks, their industry partners, and congressional allies. The U.S. active duty military force consists of 1.4 million troops of which only about 50,000 are elite special operators, with only several thousand deployed to Afghanistan. Many military professionals prefer to have special operators continue in a supporting, not leading role.

Immediately after recently assuming his new post, Gates correctly stated that the U.S. must win in Iraq or face a “calamity” that would “endanger Americans for decades to come.” Since the fall of Baghdad, the U.S. has had the will to win but not the right strategy. It’s imperative that the U.S. transition quickly to an unconventional war strategy the war will be lost. The new “Lily Pad Strategy” must evolve now. There will be more published on this new out-of-the-box- global war-fighting strategy…….

Paul Vallely, MG U.S. Army (Ret) is Chairman of the Stand Up America USA and Save Our Democracy Now Projects and co- author of “Operation Sucker Punch” and “Endgame".

Blind Leading the Blind: Michael Moore's Socialist Propaganda

2009-10-04T09:14:00.000-07:00

The Hands-Out: "Death To Capitalism!!!"; ***Uh, like, OK... they are the 'Hand That Feeds You';(?); Are ya suicidal too? How ironic is it? The Socialists turn the ignorant against Capitalists who are the very ones paying for their entitlements.

Michael Moore's new film is anti-capitalism, but, i have yet to find ANY venue where it is being shown FREE. Moore has more than capitalized on his scam and Socialist agenda, in as much the same way as Al Gore. In fact, the most wealthiest politicians are the Democrats pushing for all the Socialist programs, convincing the 'Hands-out' they are all concerned for them.

There are actually people who can tie their own shoes which believe Moore's film is "Religious" and capitalism is anti-Christian. Nothing is more ungodly than Socialism and the ranks which befall it.

Hey Michael Moore! I got news for ya buddy...not only are you confused about capitalism, but, you are contributing to it as much as anyone in society by promoting your misleading propaganda which is deceiving the very people which depend on the Capitalist's taxes for their entitlements. FOCUS!

The present government's agenda is to make everyone the same...dependent on the government. We have to assume Obama IS a law grad, as like no other Pres before him he has not presented any documentation of any kind, but, what is intelligent abou...t ridding the country of those vile tax payers which pay for the government?

Socialism, and its successor Communism, has failed in every country that has adapted it, past and present. If you like Communism call your travel agent and take advantage of the cheapest deals in the world, as nobody else travels to them. Your time is running out here!!!

"Americans will never give up their capitalism, and jump into communism. But, give them a little Socialism ata a time, and they will one day wake up in Communism"~ Nakita Khrushchev, former leader of the Soviet Union

Be careful what you wish for...

Pro-Life Amendments Defeated: Exposing The Lies

2009-10-03T05:07:00.000-07:00

On Wednesday, the Senate Finance Committee’s vote of 10-13 to defeat the Hatch Amendment proved the pro-life community correct: The talk from the White House and the Congressional leadership of avoiding funding of abortions in health care is just that -- talk.

The amendment sponsored by Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) would have explicitly prohibited federal funding and coverage of abortions. Also defeated by the committee was another amendment by Sen. Hatch that would have prevented discrimination against any individual or organization who refused to provide, pay for, provide coverage of, or refer for abortions.

So what does this mean? Since the start of the health care debate, including at a White House meeting last month, Americans United for Life Action has argued consistently that rhetorical assurances that abortion funding will not be included in health care reform are not enough. Rhetoric must be matched with action, with the addition in the bills of specific language prohibiting abortion. Since all five committees have rejected pro-life amendments which would ban abortion funding and coverage in health care, it is clear that we MUST keep questioning the gap between reality and the rhetorical assurances we are hearing from President Obama, Majority Leader Reid and Speaker Pelosi.

The AUL legal team has documented the facts behind their myth that the Hyde Amendment would adequately prevent federal funding and coverage of abortion in health care reform. AUL wants you to have the facts to make it easy to speak up.

Now that committee consideration of health care reform is over, the “behind the scenes” negotiations begin. At this crucial stage, the Congressional leadership is going to be negotiating backroom deals with our legislators. Be aware that the next page in the pro-abortion playbook will be that Pelosi and Reid are going to try to make a deal like the anti-life Capps Amendment approach, which we oppose. The anti-life Capps Amendment approach is not acceptable because for the first time in history, the federal government will require that there be a health insurance plan that covers abortion in every area. Furthermore, the anti-life Capps Amendment permits federal money to go to insurance plans that cover abortion.

I assure you, we are hearing that the “deals” being discussed by Congressional Leadership on Capitol Hill are merely anti-life initiatives in the guise of ‘compromise,’ such as the Capps Amendment approach, and this will NOT protect pro-lifers from subsidizing abortion in health care reform.

This is where you come in.

YOU need to tell your congressman and senator that you will ONLY accept health care reform that includes an explicit prohibition on federal funding and coverage of abortion, much like the pro-life Stupak-Pitts and Hatch amendments that were defeated in Committees.

Everyone's support is important during this extremely busy time as we work to show Congress and all Americans that “Real Health Care Respects Life”!

Understand the Abortion Mandate. You can print and send your friends this flowchart [PDF sheet] which demonstrates how the abortion mandate will work without an explicit, proactive exclusion of abortion from health care reform. Please let your friends know about these efforts to mandate taxpayer-funded abortions as a part of the current health care proposals.

The first Sunday in October is Respect Life Sunday. On this special day, please reflect with gratitude on God’s priceless gift of human life. While you are at church, you can help make a difference by printing and handing out several copies of AUL's flyer to help educate your friends and family that Real Health Care Respects Life!

AUL in the news and Related articles:

NY Times: BlogTalk: Public Option, ACORN and the Children

RedState.com: Reality Check: The Reality Behind the Rhetoric About Abortion in Health Care Reform (by Charmaine Yoest)

National Review: Health-Care and Abortion Funding Update

jihad Is Coming To A Nieghborhood Near You

2009-09-30T12:10:00.001-07:00

WARNING: This video contains graphic violent images

Fitna (original) - Watch more Funny Videos
I had to debate whether or not I should post this video, but, it is time for Americans to wake up. Apathy will get your children a very grim future.

jihad is coming to your neighborhood

Regardless of your Political Views:
Every American needs to see to see this film, and to support Geert Widers, who is being persecuted for making it, and who must live under 24 hour protection in safe houses, for speaking out against radical Islam's war on the... West. This is disturbing to watch, but vitally important.

The deceiving term is "Radical" as it suggests only a fanatic portion of Islam. The FEW who claim Islam is not violent are liars, to spread propaganda, or apostates, whose opinion is worthless. I will gladly point out the pillars and other parts of the Koran to any of those liars or apostates which desire to argue.

Any muslim that follows the true doctrines of the Koran knows eventually it must be "Death to infidels" before their Imam can return. That is the agenda of jihad. ALL true muslims must support jihad or they are apostates or liars, for the rhetoric to deceive those who are afraid of being labeled bigots or "politically incorrect". It is the same as a person who claims to be Christian but doesnt believe in the Bible or claims to be Christian to get elected. It is fine to lie for jihad movement.

All Koran believing muslims support jihad with prayer or financially. All working muslims and business owners tithe 20% minimum to mosques and organizations which filter the money to jihad movement. YOU ARE LIED TO... if Islam wanted to save its image and prove to the rest of the world all this is not true, and they, for the most part, denounced terrorism, there would be no terrorism.

It is only a handful, mostly college students or grads which have been assigned to spread rhetoric of peace and love and opposition is bigotry. There is over a billion muslims in the world. If the majority were against the jihad movement(which is Koran doctrine), they could certainly overpower or shame those they claim are "radical".

Its not just Mahmud Ahmanuhtjob that wants Jews whiped off the face of the earth. That is more rhetoric. The Koran teaches they are sub-human and will never be converted and should die at "Every opportunity". This is radical! Islam is radical. I have been trying to wake people up for years to the fact that it is an evil, cultist, religion which agenda is to dominate and convert all the globe... Infidels (that's you and I) MUST DIE!!! What part do you not understand, or believe?

As you ignorantly chose to be in denial of the TRUE nature of Islam, even when you have not read their Koran, look at your children. Think about what you will say when attempting to explain why we allowed a radical religion take over our country...IF you survive.

New Warning To Cops and Deputies Regarding "Right Wing" Terrorists

2009-09-26T14:09:00.000-07:00

SPLC alarm: 'Militiamen, white supremacists, anti-Semites, nativists, tax protesters coalescing'

Posted: September 25, 2009
10:10 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

A private activist organization apparently is picking up where the federal government left off when the Department of Homeland Security issued its "Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment" warning that returning veterans and people in a long list of other categories were potential terrorists.

Only the new warning, delivered recently to police officers, sheriffs and other law enforcement personnel across the country, is lumping those dedicated to the constitutional principles on which the nation was founded together with crazed killers.

The fall 2009 "Intelligence Report" was issued recently by the Southern Poverty Law Center, where officials confirmed to WND it was published specifically for and delivered to law enforcement personnel across the nation. The SPLC did not respond to a WND request for other comment

America at the crossroads: 'Liberty and Tyranny.' Mark Levin's manifesto provides antidote to growing stranglehold of statism. Just $4.95 today!

But the article groups members of various organizations such as Oathkeepers – whose mainly military and law enforcement members pledge to uphold their constitutional duties, including the duty to question and refuse what appear to be illegitimate orders – with a man "said to be interested in joining a militia" who is accused of killing two deputies in Florida.

"The situation has many authorities worried," the report to police officers says. "Militiamen, white supremacists, anti-Semites, nativists, tax protesters and a range of other activists of the radical right are cross-pollinating and may even be coalescing."

Garbage, says a supporter of the individual rights of gun ownership contained in the Second Amendment.

Mike Vanderboegh is with the Sipsey Street Irregulars, who describe themselves as among the 3 percent as in: "During the American revolution, the active forces in the field against the King's tyranny never amounted to more than 3 percent of the colonists."

The SPLC "are conflation experts," he told WND. "They have a pot and they throw everyone in it in an attempt to tar the rest of us with the racists and terrorists they throw in there."

He said the largest number of active members of various "militias" are constitutionalists, libertarians and conservatives who simply fear the government's swift advances toward federal ownership of banks and auto companies, intervention in personal rights such as health care and obstruction of constitutional provisions with gun regulations.

Only the minority are focused on conspiracy theories and the like, he said.

He said, for example, he was at the Oathkeepers April ceremony in Lexington, and the members with no significant exceptions were highly decorated and long-term serving military members and police. The group's principles include statements they will uphold their oath to support the Constitution.

"What I saw there was quintessentially America," he said.

Are you an enemy of the state? Get the bumper sticker that lets everyone know you have no apologies for being right!

The warning from the SPLC echoes the alarmism from the earlier federal report. WND has posted the report online.

It warned of potential terrorism threats from those who:

Oppose abortion
Are returning veterans
Oppose same-sex marriage
Oppose restrictions on firearms
Oppose lax immigration laws
Oppose the policies of President Obama regarding immigration, citizenship, and the expansion of social programs
Oppose continuation of free trade agreements
Are suspect of foreign regimes
Fear Communist regimes
Oppose a "one world" government
Bemoan the decline of U.S. stature in the world
Are upset with loss of U.S. manufacturing jobs to China and India, and more

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano later apologized to veterans for including them in the list but not to other groups of people, not even when WND also reported later that the "extremism" report was confirmed to have been based on Internet "chatter."

Under the headline "Going Feral," the SPLC warning to police quotes personalities such as Fox News host Glenn Beck, U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann and actor Chuck Norris.

"It's like Thomas Jefferson said, a revolution every now and then is a good thing. We are at the point ... of revolution. And by that, what I mean [is] an orderly revolution, where the people of this country wake up and get up and make a decision that this is not going to happen on their watch," the warning quoted Bachmann, R-Minn., saying.

Norris, in a WND column in March, wrote, "How much more will Americans take? When will enough be enough? And, when that time comes, will our leaders finally listen or will history need to record a second American Revolution?"

Check out WND's impressive collection of 13-star Betsy Ross flags, Navy Jack, Gadsden and tea-stained flags!

Beck's "threat" was, "If this country starts to spiral out of control and, you know, and Mexico melts down or whatever, if it really starts to spiral out of control … Americans … just won't stand for it. There will be parts of the country that will rise up."

In a later column, Norris addressed the issue in a discussion of the 9/12 rally in Washington, where hundreds of thousands of people assembled to protest uncontrolled spending by government and its interference in individual lives.

"On Sept. 12, 2002, we sought to protect our nation against terrorists from without. Beginning on Sept. 12, 2009, we are seeking to protect our nation against enemies of our republic from within. Many of us are protesting the present political direction of Washington. Outrageous borrowing, excessive bailouts, massive spending, speedball stimulus plans … swings toward socialism are just a few of things that were protested that day. Of course, economics is far from America's only problem, as large as it appears to loom," Norris wrote.

"I want to emphasize: this revolutionary movement is not solely an independent, Republican or Democrat fight. It represents patriots fed up against modernists who seek to overturn almost every principle and tenet laid down by our country's founders at the inception of our republic. From the East Coast to the 'Left Coast,' America seems to be moving further and further from its founders' vision and government," he said.

A column by gun rights author David Codrea said, "SPLC's Larry Keller asserts they are 'particularly worrisome.' A fair question might be 'why' or 'to whom?' It's not like they're associated with anything other than patriotism, in spite of his attempts to insinuate racist ties."

Codrea said a militia was important enough for the Founding Fathers to declare them "necessary to the security of a free state."

The terror theme also was raised recently by Democrats. WND reported when an "Organizing for America" campaign document outlined a plan to have activists telephone their state's senators Sept. 11 to demand a "public option," which critics say would lead to a government health-care monopoly.

Bobby Eberle, posting on a Republican Party site called The Loft, said Obama "and his team have no limits on what they will do or say in order to inject socialist views into the minds of Americans."

"They also have absolutely no respect or appreciation for the American way and the sacrifices Americans have made in order to stay free and to promote the American way of life across the globe. Just take the latest effort being pitched at BarackObama.com. Rather than remembering the Americans who lost their lives during the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, Obama's political team wants you to make phone calls on 9/11 to fight back against 'Right-Wing Domestic Terrorists,'" Eberle wrote.

The OFA plan said, "All 50 states are coordinating in this – as we fight back against our own Right-Wing Domestic Terrorists who are subverting the American Democratic Process, whipped to a frenzy by their Fox Propaganda Network ceaselessly reseizing power for their treacherous leaders."

Shortly after the "extremism" report was released, WND reported, the Department of Defense was describing protesters as "low-level terrorists."

WND later reported when the DoD eventually withdrew a training manual question that linked protesters across the U.S. to terrorism.

The Thomas More Law Center has filed a lawsuit against Napolitano and the DHS on behalf of nationally syndicated conservative radio talk show host Michael Savage, Gregg Cunningham of the pro-life organization Center for Bio-Ethical Reform Inc. and Iraqi War Marine veteran Kevin Murray.

The lawsuit alleges the federal agency violated the First and Fifth Amendment constitutional rights of the three plaintiffs by targeting them for disfavored treatment and chilling their free speech, expressive association and equal protection rights. The lawsuit further claims DHS encouraged law enforcement officers throughout the nation to target and report citizens to federal officials as suspicious rightwing extremists and potential terrorists because of their political beliefs.

On The Job Training For The Anti-American President

2009-09-22T07:56:00.000-07:00

Obama's anniversary gift to Russia...
President Obama is making so many foreign-policy blunders that he is starting to make us yearn for the national-security acumen of the Carter administration. His official announcement scrapping the planned missile-defense system in Poland and the Czech Republic was long expected but still landed with a thud. It is hard to remember a strategic choice that is so obviously wrong on so many levels. The Kremlin is delighted. Read More...

The White House picked an auspicious day to wave the white flag on missile defense. The president's national-security team may say they didn't notice that the announcement came on the 70th anniversary of the Soviet invasion of Poland in 1939, but everyone in Eastern Europe did. For an administration whose claims of heightened cultural sensitivity border on sanctimony, the timing was an unforgivable faux pas. The anniversary gift compounds the message that Washington is bent on courting Moscow regardless of the broader implications for global security.

Subverting Honduran democracy...

The shameful siege of Honduras continues. In the past few weeks, the United States has cut more than $30 million in non-humanitarian aid, suspended most visa services and sided with Venezuela, Cuba and other of Latin America's worst dictatorships in undermining democracy. Meanwhile, the people of Honduras are desperately trying to maintain their freedom and prevent the return of a regime that Washington is committed to forcing down their throats.

The United States rushed to the wrong side of this issue when former Honduran President Manuel Zelaya was ousted on June 28, and since then it has reinforced a bad policy. Rather than seek means of mitigating the crisis, the United States clings obdurately to demands that Mr. Zelaya be returned to power. Read more...

Obama sides with Castro, Chavez of Venezuela, and Zelaya on the future of Honduras. Not so much inexperience, as is communist agenda. Right under our noses.

Cut and Run? Obama goes wobbly on Afghanistan...

It astonishes us how quickly Afghanistan is moving from being a "war of necessity" to "too tough to do." President Obama's comments over the weekend gave the clearest signal yet that his administration is seeking an exit strategy from a conflict he described in August as "not only a war worth fighting" but "fundamental to the defense of our people." Commitment to that fundamental defense is eroding.

The president is being foiled by complex terrain, by which we mean the Congress. The Democratic leadership has indicated it would not look favorably on requests for more troops, which most analysts believe are necessary to stabilize the situation. Read more on Afghanistan...

Obama hardly remembers who A.C.O.R.N. is...

In an interview over the weekend the President was asked whether he supports withdrawing funds and an investigation into the criminal organization. He replied he was unaware there was a problem with A.C.O.R.N. nor did he know they were receiving Federal funding. What?!! The sad thing is there is a certain portion of the population which will believe this fantasy.

Obama has the weakest foreign-policy record of any new U.S. president in recent memory. An around-the-world tour of international hot spots shows that for all the president's lofty rhetoric, he can point to precious few accomplishments. Read more...

If our Congress had anymore integrity than the presumed President, it would be working on the same result Honduras had to deal with Zelaya. {2010}

The Angriest President

2009-09-20T06:40:00.000-07:00

There's' a place in the world for the angry young man
With his working class ties and his radical plans
He refuses to bend, he refuses to crawl,
And he's always at home with his back to the wall.
And he's proud of his scars and the battles he's lost,
And he struggles and bleeds as he hangs on his cross-
And he likes to be known as the angry young man.'
"Angry Young Man" - Billy Joel

The Angriest President
by Stephen GuyHardin

Like another bad film starring a topless Maggie Gyllenhaal or another misguided pseudo I Heart Huckabees misfire, we have a President who lives in his own ultimate truth of reality, in which he is a star searching for a venue to display the luster of his destiny. It is indeed unfortunate for Barack Obama to live in a reality that denies him the venue of fame that only exists in the mind of the angriest President. Placed upon a global stage that can no longer be manipulated by George Soros and Oprah, Barack Obama must contend with the tedium of liberal Sunday talking head shows and stale David Letterman sycophancy to convey his dated and discredited creed of Marxism and social injustice. Imitating a B-grade trade show convention speaker for the Peoria Chapter of the Black Panthers, Barack ticks off tired racial clique after tired racial clique, as the over ripened congregation of middle aged activists check their Blackberry's and pick at the stale remains of their catered lasagna in anticipation of the post-convention trip to the nearest strip club.

In a sad imitation of Al Pacino in Devil's Advocate, our angriest President smirks and grimaces and berates and lectures to his captive audiences of union thugs and community activists. Beating the dead horse of socialized medicine beyond all recognition of the reality of public opinion, our angriest President refuses to step from the enlightened path of his wage against the machine. Hiding his life of privilege and preference beneath the color of rage and resentment, Barack reels fact after misshapen fact at a public increasingly disengaged from the rhetoric of an angry middle aged man. The compulsion of anger has replaced the debate over policy, with emotion and feelings replacing facts and fairness. The only consistent element in Barack's campaign of public enlightenment is anger and glorified moral outage at the supremacy of corruption and white man's greed disguised under the cloak of the status quo.

When all hope of political or moral victory has been exhausted the angriest President refuses to change course or concede defeat. Only knowing the currents of conflict that belong back in the history of the streets of Hyde Park, Barack only knows the theory of the attack. Unable to acknowledge defeat or consider compromise, the angriest President only knows to walk the path he has learned from the disciples of the Weather Underground and the Nation of Islam. This path is the one where he is always deferred to due to his cultural heritage, his politically correct African name and the carefully manicured socialist caricature that is Barack Obama. Conflicted by the divergent goals of politics and idealism, Barrack is no longer able to resolve the disappointment of reality with the compromise of politics. Anger has replaced the soul of a man who once sought to placate the suffering of his people and lead a nation he despises into a new age of cultural enlightenment and political correctness.

Brainwashed in the classic prose of Che and Mao to be the unthinking and unfeeling soldier of a revolution that never was, Barack sings the song of the pedantic poet who inhabited the unemployment lines in Cambridge and Chicago in the era of post sixties chic radicalism that were discredited when he was still a child playing in the sands of Waikiki. Evolving from Bob Dylan's John Wesley Harding to the casual counter-racism of Kanye West playing for a Katrina opiated media orgy, our angriest President has adopted his classroom learned message of reversing social injustice to his megalomaniacal message of liberal fascism masked as government for the people and by the people.

Living in the alternate reality of the social activist gone Hollywood, where chaos and suffering are gleaned as opportunities to harness the sufferings and dreams of the people he claims to strive for, our angriest President interprets the histories of Malcolm X and Dr. King as unfulfilled shadows of the greatness he feels destined to eclipse. Discarding the history of a nation that has given him the opportunity for greatness, Barack squanders and maligns the greatness of America in a vain and megalomaniacal quest to create the image of a Leader that will eclipse all who have gone before and all who will come after. The realization that this holy quest is fleeting, depending upon the whim of public opinion of the great unwashed masses, only increases the fury and uncivil discourse of our angriest President.

Striking in similarity to the growing smallness of Jimmy Carter during the waning days of his Presidential malaise, Barack is nearing the sweater wearing period of his administration in which he blames his political bankruptcy on the American voter and avoids the image of failure he sees in the mirror. Embarking upon the tread worn path of mediocrity well known to Democrat Presidents of the past, Barack Obama only knows to proclaim his vision upon the sound stages of Hollywood and other safe havens of the Liberal celebrity carousel. As though auditioning for the tenth round of an e-Harmony ad, Barack breaks out his well rehearsed dog and pony show lamenting the horrors of the American cultural genocide against the oppressed communities of Southside Chicago. Deigning to step down from the pinnacle of the Presidency to the gutter of the modern American celebrity, Barack Obama refuses to bend, refuses to crawl, and he's always at home with his back to the wall, and he's proud of his scars and the battles he's lost, and he struggles and bleeds as he hangs on the cross, and he's doomed to be known as the angriest President.

www.stephenguyhardin.com

www.hardinrepublic.com.com

www.hardinreport.com

www.stephenguyhardin.ning.com